塔里木河中游不同生境土壤理化性质分析

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2015.01.017

林业资源管理 ›› 2015›› Issue (1): 95-100.doi: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2015.01.017

塔里木河中游不同生境土壤理化性质分析

王夏楠¹, 周正立^1,2, 王亮¹, 梁继业^1,2, 吕瑞恒^1,2

1.新疆生产建设兵团塔里木盆地生物资源保护利用重点实验室,新疆阿拉尔 843300;
2.新疆塔里木大学植物科学学院,新疆阿拉尔 843300

出版日期:2015-02-28 发布日期:2020-12-01
通讯作者: 周正立,男,副教授,硕士,研究方向:干旱区植物多样性保育。Email:zzlzkytd@163.com
作者简介:王夏楠(1988-),女,山西长治人,在读硕士,研究方向为森林生态。Email:czswxn@126.com
基金资助:
“973”计划前期研究专项(2012CB723204);“973”计划前期研究专项(2011CB411909);国家自然基金(31360109)

Analysis on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties of Different Habitats in the Middle Reaches of the Tarim River

WANG Xianan¹, ZHOU Zhengli^{1, 2}, WANG Liang¹, LIANG Jiye^{1, 2}, LU Ruiheng^{1, 2}

1.Key Laboratory of Protection and Utilization of Biological Resources in Tarim Basin,Xinjiang Production & Construction Corps,Alar Xinjiang 843300,China;
2.College of Plant Science and Technology,Tarim University,Alar,Xinjiang 843300,China

Online:2015-02-28 Published:2020-12-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以塔里木河中游荒漠河岸植被为研究对象,运用野外取样调查和实验室检测的分析方法,研究不同生境土壤理化性质特征及其相关性;探讨生境退化过程中土壤理化性质的主要因子分析。结果表明1)距离河岸越远,容重均值减小,土壤含水量降低。生境Ⅱ土壤物理性质明显改善,持水性能显著提高。生境Ⅲ持水蓄水能力明显降低。2)不同生境土壤PH值总体呈碱性,全盐量变现为“表聚性”。生境Ⅱ全盐总量、有机质明显高于其他生境。随着地下水位降低,全磷、全钾含量升高。3)相关性分析可知,含水量与其他指标的关系较为密切。容重与全磷的相关性最大。pH值与碱解氮、速效钾也存在明显的正负相关关系(P＜0.05)。4)主成分分析表明土壤结构与全钾因子、土壤速效养分供应因子累计贡献率高达100.00。因此,选取这几个因子作为该区域评价生境退化特征主成分分析的依据,可为塔里木河中游乃至中国西北绿洲生态保护和荒漠化生态系统恢复重建提供理论依据。

关键词: 荒漠河岸植被, 生境退化, 土壤理化性质

Abstract: The desert riparian vegetation in the middle of Tarim River was selected as the research object.The characteristics and correlation of soil physical and chemical properties in different habitats were studied by using field sampling investigation and laboratory test analysis method and the main factors of soil physical and chemical properties in the succession of habitat degradation discussed.The results showed that(1)Along with the farther distance from the banks,average unit weight and moisture content decreased.The soil physical properties obviously improved in the habitatⅡ,water-holding performance improved significantly.The soil moisture storage capacity was reduced in habitat Ⅲ.(2)The overall soil PH value was alkaline in different habitats,the soil soluble in each profile had obvious properties of surface-aggregation.The total amount of salt and organic matter in habitat Ⅱ was significantly higher than those of other habitats.As the underground water level was reduced,total phosphorus,total potassium content increased.(3)The correlation analysis showed water content had relatively close relationship with other indicators,and the correlation of bulk density and total phosphorus was the largest.The PH value had a obvious negative correlation with alkali solution nitrogen and available potassium(P＜0.05).(4)The principal component analysis showed that the cumulative contribution which included the factor of the soil structure and total potassium and the factor of available nutrient was 100.00.So these indicators served as the basis of characteristics of the habitat degradation evaluation principal component analysis.It would provide theoretical basis for desertification ecosystem restoration and oasis ecological protection of the middle reaches of the Tarim River and even for the northwest China.

Key words: desert riparian vegetation, desertification, soil physical and chemical properties

中图分类号:

S714.2

王夏楠, 周正立, 王亮, 梁继业, 吕瑞恒. 塔里木河中游不同生境土壤理化性质分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2015,(1): 95-100.

WANG Xianan, ZHOU Zhengli, WANG Liang, LIANG Jiye, LU Ruiheng. Analysis on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties of Different Habitats in the Middle Reaches of the Tarim River[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2015,(1): 95-100.

参考文献 22

[1]	王丽艳,韩有志,张成梁,等.不同植被恢复模式下煤矸石山复垦土壤性质及煤矸石风化物的变化特征[J].生态学报,2011,31(21):6429-6441.
[2]	Vitousek p m,Matson p a,Cleve k v.Nitrogen availability and nitrification during succession,primary,secondary and old field series[J].Plant and Soil,1989,115:229-239.
[3]	刘美爽,董希斌,郭辉,等.小兴安岭低质林采伐改造后土壤理化性质变化分析[J].东北林业大学学报,2010,38(10):36-40.
[4]	张巧明,王得祥,龚明贵,等.秦岭火地塘林区不同海拔森林土壤理化性质[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(5):69-73.
[5]	陈志超,蔡太义,郝成元,等.伏牛山森林土壤理化性质空间分异特征[J].南方农业学报,2013,44(7):1140-1144.
[6]	肖飞,杜耘,凌峰,等.长江中游四湖流域湖泊变迁与湖区土壤空间格局的关联分析[J].湿地科学,2012,10(1):8-14.
[7]	吴波,李秀梅,苏志珠,等.库姆塔格沙漠地区景观格局与动态研究[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(1):1-8.
[8]	王希义,徐海量,凌洪波,等.塔里木河中游荒漠河岸林物种多样性对地下水埋深变化的响应[J].西北植物学报,2013,33(10):2071-2076.
[9]	王海珍,陈加利,韩路,等.地下水位对胡杨(Populus euphratica)和灰胡杨(Populus pruinosa)叶绿素荧光光响应与光合色素含量的影响[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(4):1054-1063.
[10]	韩路,王海珍,彭杰,等.不同生境胡杨种群径级结构与格局动态研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2010,32(1):7-12.
[11]	Vance N C,Entry J A.Properties important to the restoration of a Shasta red fir barrens in the Siskiyou Mountains Forest[J].Ecology and Management,2000,138:427-434.
[12]	于军,白冠章,梁继业,等.塔里木河上、中、下游胡杨种群高度结构特征[J].干旱区资源与环境,2012,26(7):103-109.
[13]	徐海量,陈亚宁,杨戈.塔里木河下游生态输水对植被和地下水位的影响[J].环境科学,2003,24(4):18-22.
[14]	马雪华.森林生态系统定位研究方法[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1994.
[15]	鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999.
[16]	杜荣骞.生物统计学[M].3版.北京:高等教育出版社,2009:25-28.
[17]	魏强,凌雷,柴春山,等.甘肃兴隆山森林演替过程中的土壤理化性质[J].生态学报,2012,32(15):4700-4713.
[18]	康冰,刘世荣,蔡道雄,等.南亚热带不同植被恢复模式下土壤理化性质[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(10):2479-2486.
[19]	郝兴明,陈亚宁,李卫红,等.塔里木河中下游荒漠河岸林植被对地下水埋深变化的响应[J].地理学报,2008,63(11):1123-1130.
[20]	MA Xiaodong,CHEN Yaning,ZHU Chenggang,et al.The variation in soil moisture and the appropriate groundwater table for desert riparian forest along the Lower Tarim River[J].J.Geogr.Sci,2011,21(1):150-162.
[21]	Xingming Hao,Weihong Li,Xiang Huang,et al.Assessment of the groundwater threshold of desert riparian forest vegetation along the middle and lower reaches of the Tarim River,China[J].Hydrol.Process,2010(24):178-186.
[22]	于洋,王海燕,丁国栋,等.华北落叶松人工林土壤微生物数量特征及其与土壤性质的关系[J].东北林业大学学报,2011,39(3):76-80.

塔里木河中游不同生境土壤理化性质分析

Analysis on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties of Different Habitats in the Middle Reaches of the Tarim River

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 22

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨浚恒, 崔海军, 石珣珣, 郭应, 张璞韬, 毕晓婷. 长期排水造林对云贵高原亚热带泥炭藓沼泽土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 林业资源管理, 2023, 0(1): 80-86.
[2]	冯茹, 郝晨阳, 马秀枝, 李依倩, 李长生, 张志杰. 短期模拟增温对大青山油松人工林土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 林业资源管理, 2022, 0(2): 141-148.
[3]	周会萍, 王晓冰, 曹映辉, 王爱芝, 梁婉言. 刺柏人工林土壤有机碳垂直分布特征研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2019, 0(6): 108-114.
[4]	冯倩倩, 铁英, 周梅, 向昌林, 乌艺恒. 华北落叶松人工林不同造林密度土壤理化性质分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2018, 0(6): 106-110.
[5]	周全, 王瑞辉, 钟呈, 周阳超, 符伟男. 抚育间伐对不同龄林杉木人工林土壤理化性质和固土保水的影响研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2018, 0(4): 47-54.
[6]	陈家林, 裴丙, 刘红恩, 付梦瑶, 郭二辉, 杨喜田. 华北石质山区不同水土保持树种对土壤质量的影响[J]. 林业资源管理, 2016, 0(2): 81-86.
[7]	吕竟斌, 张秋良, 于楠楠, 王冬至, 莫日根, 张智慧. 蛮汉山油松及华北落叶松抚育间伐对土壤理化性质及微生物影响[J]. 林业资源管理, 2012, 0(4): 74-79.
[8]	张彩凤, 杨小波, 李东海, 莫镇嶂, 叶富宏. 木麻黄海防林林下物种多样性及其与土壤因子关系[J]. 林业资源管理, 2012, 0(4): 80-85.
[9]	黄承标, 农锦德, 杨钙仁, 黄欣明, 陶大燕, 朱木花. 尾巨桉引种新区连续年龄序列生长量及土壤理化特性[J]. 林业资源管理, 2012, 0(1): 70-74.
[10]	孙嘉, 王海燕, 丁国栋, 于洋, 任丽娜, 梁文俊. 不同密度华北落叶松人工林土壤理化性质研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2011, 0(1): 62-66.
[11]	马志林, 周心澄, 史常青. 高寒山区退耕还林不同年限土壤理化性质研究——以青海省大通县为例[J]. 林业资源管理, 2008, 0(3): 72-76.