河套灌区两类农田防护林防护效益对比研究

林业资源管理 ›› 2009›› Issue (4): 85-91.

河套灌区两类农田防护林防护效益对比研究

孙旭, 高岗, 刘静, 高永

内蒙古农业大学生态环境学院,呼和浩特 010019

收稿日期:2009-05-05 修回日期:2009-06-26 出版日期:2009-08-28 发布日期:2020-12-16
通讯作者: 高永
作者简介:孙旭(1964－),男,副教授,在职博士,研究方向:水土保持、荒漠化防治及农田防护林。sunsu507@126.com
基金资助:
国际科技合作项目(2008DFA32270);内蒙古“十五”攻关基金课题 (20010205)

Study on Benefits of Two Kinds of Poplars and Distance of Farmland Protective Forest in the Hetao Area

SUN Xu, GAO Gang, LIU Jing, GAO Yong

College of Ecology and Environmental Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Huhhot, 010019, China

Received:2009-05-05 Revised:2009-06-26 Online:2009-08-28 Published:2020-12-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以灌区农田防护林为研究对象,对灌区2种杨树2种主林带间距防护林内小气候效应进行了研究。结果表明,在200m间距内,新疆杨最大降低风速39.35%,最低降低风速23.10%,平均降低风速33.58%;小美旱杨最大降低风速40.68%,最低降低风速31.92%,平均降低风速36.09%。经方差分析,2种杨树在200m间距内防风效益差异显著,小美旱杨优于新疆杨。从水文效应、热力效应方面分析,无论新疆杨还是小美旱杨,100m主林带间距和200m间距对水文效应和热力效应影响不显著。综合考虑,小美旱杨防护林优于新疆杨防护林,200m间距优于100m间距。

关键词: 农田防护林, 小气候效应, 小美旱杨, 新疆杨

Abstract: The study on the protective effect of farmland protective forest was conducted. The result shows that with the condition of 100m and 200m's distance space of sheltbelts,the distinction about two kinds of distance space of sheltbelts on P. alba var.pyramidalis temperature and water effect is not notably different, but it is notably different in windbreak effect aspect;the distinction about two kinds of distance space of sheltbelts on P. Popularis' protective effect is not notably different;on the condition of 200m distance space of sheltbelts, P. Popularis' sheleter forest protective effect is superior to P. alba var.pyramidalis sheleter forest.Based on the analytic hierarchy process, the result of comprehensive benefit evaluation indicates that P. Popularis' sheleter forest is superior to P. alba var.pyramidalis sheleter forest and 200m's distance space of sheltbelts is superior to100m's.

Key words: farmland shelter forest, benefit, P.popularis, P.alba varpyram idalis

中图分类号:

S727.24

孙旭, 高岗, 刘静, 高永. 河套灌区两类农田防护林防护效益对比研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2009,(4): 85-91.

SUN Xu, GAO Gang, LIU Jing, GAO Yong. Study on Benefits of Two Kinds of Poplars and Distance of Farmland Protective Forest in the Hetao Area[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2009,(4): 85-91.

参考文献

[1]曹新孙.农田防护林学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1993:100-113.
[2]肖纪浩,钟志岩,秦学君,等.树种结构的灰色优化[J].林业资源管理,1996(5):51-54.
[3]潘文利,于雷.辽河三角洲盐碱地防护林体系建设技术研究[J].应用生态学报,1998,9(3):231-236.
[4]孙枫,李生宝,蒋齐.宁夏盐池沙区生态经济型防护林体系林种树种优化比例[J].林业科学研究,2003,16(4):459-464.
[5]胡嘉良,向开馥.东北半干旱地区农田林网中综合气候效益的分析[C]//向开馥.防护林研究(第一集).哈尔滨:东北林业大学出版社,1989:131-141.
[6]胡海波,王汉杰,鲁小珍,等.中国干旱半干旱地区防护林气候效应的分析[J].南京林业大学学报,2001,25(7):77-82.
[7]王葆芳,熊士平,任培政.乌兰布和沙地新开发人工绿洲防护林体系综合效益评价[J].林业科技,1998(6):12-20.
[8]王葆芳,刘星晨,任培政.乌兰布和沙地人工绿洲防护林体系模式生态和经济效益评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2002(2):60-67.
[9]陈炳浩,郝玉光,陈永富.乌兰布和沙区区域性防护林体系气候生态效益评价的研究.林业科学研究,2003,16(1):63-68.
[10]朱廷曜,孔繁智,朱劲伟,等.白音他控疏林草场气象效应初步分析[J].生态学报,1991,11(1):1-6.
[11]刘静,布和,贾俊生.河套灌区节水型农田防护林建设与节水潜力[J].内蒙古林学院学报.1999,21(3):29-32.
[12]高岩,张汝民,刘静.应用热脉冲技术对小美旱杨树干液流的研究[J].西北植物学报,2001,21(4):644-649.
[13]高岩,刘静. 应用热脉冲技术对小美旱杨耗水量的研究[J].内蒙古农业大学学报,2001,22(1):44-48.
[14]李春萍. 河套灌区新疆杨防护林耗水特性及耗水量的研究[D].内蒙古农业大学,2003:14-16.
[15]范玉杰. 河套灌区小美旱杨农田防护林生态效益研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2004.
[16]内蒙古自治区农牧业委员会办公室.内蒙古自治区盟市旗(县)综合农牧业区划简编(下)[R].呼和浩特:内蒙人民出版社.1993:671-680.
[17]王伦平.陈亚新.内蒙古河套灌区灌溉排水与盐碱化防治[M].北京:水利电力出版社,1993:2-13,37-41.
[18]裴喜春,薛河儒.SAS及应用[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1997:159-163,139-146.
[19]杜荣骞.生物统计学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,施普林格出版社,2000:128-129,135-157.