连云港花果山森林景区高分辨率火险区划

林业资源管理 ›› 2011›› Issue (5): 107-111.

连云港花果山森林景区高分辨率火险区划

费鲜芸^1,2, 高祥伟^1,2, 庄文峰³, 王红波³

1.淮海工学院测绘工程学院,江苏连云港 222005;
2.江苏省海洋资源开发研究院,江苏连云港 222001;
3.连云港市花果山风景区管理处,江苏连云港 222061

收稿日期:2011-07-07 修回日期:2011-09-07 出版日期:2011-10-28 发布日期:2020-12-21
作者简介:费鲜芸(1969-),女,山东烟台人,副教授,博士,主要从事3S技术及其应用的教学与研究工作。Email:hhitfxy@163.com
基金资助:
江苏省自然科学基金“国家级森林风景区高分辨率潜在火险等级评价研究”(BK2009627);江苏省高校“青蓝工程”(2010)

Study on High Spatial Resolution Forest Fire Risk Zoning in Lianyungang Huaguo Mountain Scenic Spot

FEI Xianyun^1,2, GAO Xiangwei^1,2, ZHUANG Wenfeng³, WANG Hongbo³

1. School of Geodesy & Geomatics Engineering,Huaihai Institute of Technology,Lianyungang 222005,China;
2. Jiangsu Marine Resources Development Research Institute,Lianyungang 222001,China;
3. Huaguo Mountain Scenic Spot Administration Office,Lianyungang 222061,China

Received:2011-07-07 Revised:2011-09-07 Online:2011-10-28 Published:2020-12-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用10cm高空间分辨率航空遥感影像,在森林资源二类调查的基础上,获取研究区的可燃物类型及其特征信息;利用1∶10000地形图获取地形因子信息。在此基础之上,通过加权叠置法计算火险指数,并将研究区划分为Ⅰ级(没有危险)、Ⅱ级(低度危险)、Ⅲ级(中度危险)、Ⅳ级(高度危险)、Ⅴ级(极度危险)等5个火险区划。结果表明:Ⅰ级火险区面积最小,占研究区总面积3.98%;Ⅱ级火险区面积最大,占32.25%;Ⅲ级火险区面积占21.05%;Ⅳ级和Ⅴ级火险区面积分别占22.14%和20.58%,两者之和较大,占研究区总面积的42.72%,研究区防火任务艰巨。研究区内可燃物类型对火险等级划分起重要作用,其中麻栎和茶树在森林防火工作中发挥重要作用;松树、竹林和荒草地是防火的重点。

关键词: 连云港花果山, 高空间分辨率, 航空遥感影像, 火险区划, 地形因子

Abstract: Using 10cm aerial images,based on forest resources surveying,the forest vegetation types and their characteristics were obtained in this paper.At the same time,various topography factors were obtained by the digital DEM.Fire risk indexes were calculated by weighted overlay method and the forest area was divided into five level fire risk zones.They are level Ⅰ(no danger), level Ⅱ(low danger), level Ⅲ(moderate danger), level Ⅳ(high danger),and level Ⅴ(extremely high danger).The result showed that:1) level Ⅰ risk zone had least area quantity that accounted for 3.98% of total study area;2) level Ⅱ risk zone owned largest area quantity and it accounted for 32.25% of total study area;3) level Ⅲ risk zone accounted for 21.05%;4) the ration of level Ⅳ and level Ⅴ was 22.14% and 20.58% respectively,and the sum accounted for 42.72% in entire study area,so fire preventing task was hard in the study area;5) fuel types played an important role in fire risk zone division.Among them,Oak and tea tree played positive action for fire prevention.The distribution area of pine,bamboo and wild grass was very crucial for fire prevention and should be managed and monitored closely.

Key words: Huaguo Mountains of Lianyungang, high spatial resolution, aerial image, forest fire risk zone, topography factors

中图分类号:

S762

费鲜芸, 高祥伟, 庄文峰, 王红波. 连云港花果山森林景区高分辨率火险区划[J]. 林业资源管理, 2011,(5): 107-111.

FEI Xianyun, GAO Xiangwei, ZHUANG Wenfeng, WANG Hongbo. Study on High Spatial Resolution Forest Fire Risk Zoning in Lianyungang Huaguo Mountain Scenic Spot[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2011,(5): 107-111.

参考文献

[1]舒立福,张小罗,戴兴安,等.林火研究综述(Ⅱ)——林火预测预报[J].世界林业研究,2003,16(4):34-37.
[2]田晓瑞,舒立福,王明玉,等.林火与气候变化研究进展[J].世界林业研究,2006,19(5):38-41.
[3]薛家翠,望胜玲,曾祥福,等.鄂西林地可燃物含水率及火险等级的气象预报研究[J].华中农业大学学报,2006,25(6):679-682.
[4]贺萍,孟超,田丰.小兴安岭地区森林地被可燃物含水率变化规律及其与森林火险等级关系[J].黑龙江气象,2008,25(3):25-27.
[5]覃先林,张子辉,易浩若,等.一种预测森林可燃物含水率的方法[J].火灾科学,2001,10(3):159-162.
[6]舒立福,田晓瑞,寇晓军.林火研究综述(I)——研究热点与进展[J].世界林业研究,2003,16(3):37-40.
[7]易浩若,纪平,覃先林.全国森林火险预报系统的研究与运行[J].林业科学,2004,40(3):201-207.
[8]徐虹,杨晓鹏,朱勇,等.基于RS和GIS的云南省森林火险预报研究[J].福建林业科技,2007,34(2):85-88.
[9]张贵,刘峰,杨志高.基于RS和GIS的广州市森林火险区划研究[J].中南林学院学报,2003,23(4):62-65.
[10]刘祖军,刘健,余坤勇,等.基于RS和GIS的森林火险区划[J].福建农林大学学报:自然科学版.2008,37(6):606-609.
[11]鲁绍伟,余新晓,刘凤芹,等.北京八达岭林场森林燃烧性及防火措施研究[J].北京林业大学,2006,28(3):109-114.
[12]祝必琴,张丽霞,彭家武,等.基于RS和GIS的庐山森林火险区划研究[J].江西农业大学学报,2009,31(3):441-448.
[13]尹海伟,孔繁花,李秀珍.基于GIS的大兴安岭森林火险区划[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(5):833-837.
[14]LY/T 1063-2008,全国森林火险区划等级[S].
[15]刘志忠,杜嘉林,钟福胤.森林火险脆弱带[J].林业科技,1992,17(2):31-32.
[16]张洪涛,祝昌汉,张尚印,等.森林火险等级分布模拟——中小尺度动力学模式[J].自然灾害学报,2003,12(1):56-62.
[17]唐忠义.DPS©数据处理系统[M] .北京:科学出版社,2010:1127-1138.