东北落叶松不同器官的热值和灰分含量分析

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 植物热值是森林生态系统中物质循环和能量转化评价的重要指标。利用假设检验和回归分析方法,对东北落叶松不同器官的热值和灰分含量进行了研究。结果表明:林木不同器官的热值和灰分含量在统计上大都存在显著差异,去灰分热值从大到小排序为叶(21.57 kJ/g)﹥枝(20.98 kJ/g)﹥皮(20.73 kJ/g)﹥根(19.88 kJ/g)﹥干(19.51 kJ/g),灰分含量排序为叶(5.79%)﹥皮(2.48%)﹥枝(1.88%)﹥根(0.95%)﹥干(0.47%);树干热值和灰分含量随树干从下往上呈增加趋势,且上、中、下部均存在显著差异;树根热值和灰分含量从根茎、粗根到细根也呈增加趋势,且两两之间差异显著;地上部分的平均干质量热值、去灰分热值和灰分含量均大于地下部分(树根),且差异显著;不同器官的热值和灰分含量与林木直径、树高和起源等因子显著相关,但其影响程度不尽相同。

关键词: 干质量热值, 去灰分热值, 灰分含量, 假设检验, 回归分析, 落叶松

Abstract: Calorific values of plants are important indices for evaluating and reflecting material cycle and energy conversion in forest ecosystems. Based on the data of larch (Larix spp) in northeast China,the calorific values (CV's) and ash contents (AC's) of different plant organs were analyzed systematically using hypothesis test and regression analysis in this paper. The results show: (i) the CV's and AC's of different plant organs are almost significantly different,and the order by AFCV (ash-free calorific value) from the largest to the smallest is foliage (21.57 kJ/g),branches (20.98 kJ/g),stem bark (20.73 kJ/g),root (19.88 kJ/g),and stem wood (19.51 kJ/g); and the order by AC is foliage (5.79%),stem bark (2.48%),branches (1.88%),root (0.95%),and stem wood (0.47%); (ii) the CV's and AC's of stem woods are increasing from lower to top sections of trunk,and those of top,middle and lower sections are significantly different; (iii) the CV's and AC's of roots are increasing from stump to large and small roots,and those between each pair are significantly different; (iv) the mean GCV (gross calorific value),AFCV and AC of aboveground part are larger than those of belowground part (roots),and the differences are also statistically significant; (v) the CV's and AC's of different organs are significantly related to diameter,height and origin of the tree,but the influence degrees of the factors on CV's and AC's are not the same.

Key words: gross calorific value, ash-free calorific value, ash content, hypothesis test, regression analysis, Larix

中图分类号:

S718

王云霖, 党永峰, 曾伟生. 东北落叶松不同器官的热值和灰分含量分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2012,(3): 100-106.

WANG Yunlin, DANG Yongfeng, ZENG Weisheng. Calorific Values and Ash Contents of Different Organs of Larch in Northeastern China[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2012,(3): 100-106.

参考文献

[1] 鲍雅静,李政海,韩兴国,等.植物热值及其生物生态学属性[J].生态学杂志,2006,25(9):1095-1103.
[2] 何晓,包维楷,辜彬,等.中国高等植物干质量热值特点[J].生态环境,2007,16(3):973-981.
[3] 官丽莉,周小勇,罗艳.我国植物热值研究综述[J].生态学杂志,2005,24(4):452-457.
[4] Abe F. Calorific value of Japanese coniferous wood[J].Forest Products Chemistry,1986,36:91-100.
[5] Senelwa K,Sims R E H. Fuel characteristics of short rotation forest biomass[J].Biomass and Bioenergy,1999,17:127-140.
[6] Bhatt B P,Tomar J M S. Firewood properties of some Indian mountain tree and shrub species[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy,2002,23:257-260.
[7] Kumar J I N,Patel K,Kumar R N,et al. An assessment of Indian fuelwood with regards to properties and environmental impact[J]. As.J.Energy Env.,2009,10(2):99-107.
[8] Wotowicz M,Szaniawska A. Calorific value,lipid content and radioactivity of common species from Hornsund,Southwest Spitsbergen[J]. Polar Research,1986,4:79-84.
[9] Goel V L,Behl H M. Fuelwood quality of promising tree species for alkaline soil sites in relation to tree age[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy,1996,10:57-61.
[10] Kataki R,Konwer D. Fuelwood characteristics of some indigenous woody species of north-east India[J].Biomass and Bioenergy,2001,20:17-23.
[11] Lemenih M,Bekele T. Effect of age on calorific value and some mechanical properties of three Eucalyptus species grown in Ethiopia[J].Biomass and Bioenergy,2004,27:223-232.
[12] Kumar R,Pandey K K,Chandrashekar N,et al. Effect of tree-age on calorific value and other fuel properties of Eucalyptus hybrid[J]. J.For. Res.,2010,21(4):514-516.
[13] 刘世荣,蔡体久,柴一新,等.落叶松人工群落能量积累分配固定和转化的研究[J].生态学杂志,1990,9(6):7-10.
[14] 刘世荣,王文章,王明启.落叶松人工林生态系统净初级生产力形成过程中的能量特征[J].植物生态学与地植物学学报,1992,16(3):209-219.
[15] 任海,彭少麟,刘鸿先,等.鼎湖山植物群落及其主要植物的热值研究[J].植物生态学报,1999,23(2): 148-154.
[16] 林益明,林鹏.福建武夷山2个典型植物群落建群种的热值研究[J].武夷科学,1999,15:118-123.
[17] 林益明,林鹏,王通.几种红树植物木材热值和灰分含量的研究[J].应用生态学报,2000,11(2):181-184.
[18] Liao C P,Wu C Z,Yan Y J,et al. Chemical elemental characteristics of biomass fuels in China[J].Biomass and Bioenergy,2004,27:119-130.
[19] 旷远文,温达志,周国逸,等.鼎湖山季风常绿阔叶林各层次优势种热值研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2005,27(2):6-12.
[20] 陈波,杨永川,周莹.浙江天童常绿阔叶林内七种优势植物的热值研究[J].华东师范大学学报:自然科学版,2006,(2):105-111.
[21] 韩国君,丛国禄,沈海龙.樟子松人工林热值与能量结构分析(I)—林木及林下植被生物量热值和能量的结构与分布[J].东北林业大学学报,2007,35(6):21-24.
[22] 林华,曹敏,张建侯.中国西南地区热带季节雨林及山地常绿阔叶林热值及能量分配格局[J].植物生态学报,2007,31(6):1103-1110.
[23] 郝翠,李洪远,姜超,等.北方半干旱区河流湿地优势植物的热值[J].生态学杂志,2008,27(12):2094-2098.
[24] 王立海,孙墨珑.东北12种灌木热值与碳含量分析[J].东北林业大学学报,2008,36(5):45-46.
[25] 王立海,孙墨珑.小兴安岭主要树种热值与碳含量[J].生态学报,2009,29(2):953-959.
[26] 陈美玲,上官周平.四种园林植物的热值与养分特征[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(4):747-751.
[27] 陈美玲,上官周平.黄土高原子午岭林区6个典型群落优势种的热值和养分特征[J].林业科学,2009,45(3):140-144.
[28] 曾小平,蔡锡安,赵平,等.广东鹤山人工林群落主要优势植物的热值和灰分含量[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(3):485-492.
[29] 孔维健,周本智,顾小平,等.大木竹和吊丝单竹热值分析[J].林业科学,2009,45(8):108-112.
[30] 鲁顺保,饶玮,张艳杰,等.厚壁毛竹热值与生物量分配规律初探[J].竹子研究汇刊,2009,28(3):34-37.
[31] 杨国平,巩合德,郑征,等.哀牢山常绿阔叶林优势树种热值与养分特征[J].浙江林学院学报,2010,27(2):251-258.
[32] 张启昌,张英楠,其其格.长白山阔叶红松林的红松种群热值[J].林业科学,2010,46(8):15-21.
[33] 李洪,胡建军.11个能源林杨柳无性系热值季节及年度变化[J].林业科学研究,2010,23(3):425-429.
[34] 张英楠,张启昌,其其格,等.长白山阔叶红松林5种优势树种的热值和能量现存量[J].东北林业大学学报,2010,38(4):3-5.
[35] 刘灿,李宏.四种杨属植物的热值及灰分含量的比较[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2010,30(10):24-28.
[36] 江丽媛,彭祚登,何宝华,等.6个树龄栓皮栎热值与碳含量的分析[J].黑龙江农业科学,2010,(11):85-89.
[37] 党永峰,曾伟生,王雪军.东北落叶松不同器官的含碳系数分析[J].林业资源管理,2011(4):30-34.
[38] 高惠璇.实用统计方法与SAS系统[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2001.
[39] 唐守正,郎奎建,李海奎.统计和生物数学模型计算(ForStat教程)[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.