米老排不同高度级苗木形态特征的分析

林业资源管理 ›› 2013›› Issue (5): 98-102.

米老排不同高度级苗木形态特征的分析

闫彩霞, 杨锦昌, 尹光天, 李荣生, 邹文涛

中国林业科学研究院热带林业研究所,广州 510520

收稿日期:2013-07-16 修回日期:2013-08-20 出版日期:2013-10-28 发布日期:2020-11-23
通讯作者: 杨锦昌(1976-),男,福建福安人,副研究员,研究方向为乡土树种资源培育与利用。
作者简介:闫彩霞(1989-),女,河南濮阳人,在读硕士,研究方向为林木苗木培育。Email:954916397@qq.com
基金资助:
广东省林业科技创新项目(2010KJCX001-06,2012KJCX001-05);林业行业专项项目(201204304)

Analysis of the Morphological Characteristics of Height-classified Mytilaria laosensis Seedlings

YAN Caixia, YANG Jinchang, YIN Guangtian, LI Rongsheng, ZOU Wentao

Research Institute of Tropical Forestry,Chinese Academy of Forestry,Guangzhou 510520,China

Received:2013-07-16 Revised:2013-08-20 Online:2013-10-28 Published:2020-11-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过选取50,60,70,80 cm共4种高度级的苗木,研究其形态特征的变化规律以及形态指标间相关性,旨在为米老排苗木质量评价和苗木分级造林提供参考。研究结果表明:地径、叶数和高径比随高度的增加而递增,其中地径和高径比在不同苗高等级间存在极显著差异;植株鲜质量和干质量随高度的增加而显著递增,其变化范围分别为30.32~50.52 g/株和11.26~16.91 g/株,鲜质量在不同器官中的分配规律为根<茎<叶,而干质量总体表现为根<叶<茎;植株含水率随高度级的增大呈递增趋势,各器官的含水率变化规律为根<茎<叶;在不同等级间地上与地下部分干质量比相对稳定;质量指数随高度等级的增大而增加,其值分别为1.018,1.121,1.208和1.239,但不同等级间无显著差异。苗木不同形态指标相互关联,其中苗高、地径、鲜质量和干质量以及质量指数最能反映米老排苗木生长的综合状况,宜作为苗木质量评价和分级的主要指标。

关键词: 苗高, 地径, 生物量, 高径比, 质量指数

Abstract: Mytilaria laosensis seedlings of 50,60,70 and 80 cm height classes at 8 months age were selected for analyzing the morphological characteristics and their correlation between morphological indices aimed to provide references for seedling evaluation and grading.Ground diameter and ratio of height to diameter increased with height class significantly(P<0.01)while leaf number varied slightly with no significant differences between classes.Fresh plant weight and dry mass also increased with height class significantly(P<0.01),ranging from 30.32 to 50.52 g/plant and from 11.26 to16.91 g/plant respectively;fresh mass was allocated to different organs with the pattern of root <stem <leaf while dry mass was done with the pattern of root <leaf <stem as a whole.Water content of seedlings showed an increasing trend with height class,and the changing pattern of water content in different organs was as root <stem <leaf.Ratio of dry mass underground to aboveground in different classes was relatively constant.Quality index increased with height class valued as 1.018,1.121,1.208 and 1.239 respectively for four height classes with no significant differences between them.Morphological indices interrelated with each other,among which seedling height,ground diameter,fresh and dry mass and quality index reflected the comprehensive growth status of M.laosensis seedlings well and should be served as main indicators for evaluating and grading the seedlings.

Key words: seedling height, ground diameter, biomass, ratio of height to diameter, quality index

中图分类号:

闫彩霞, 杨锦昌, 尹光天, 李荣生, 邹文涛. 米老排不同高度级苗木形态特征的分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2013,(5): 98-102.

YAN Caixia, YANG Jinchang, YIN Guangtian, LI Rongsheng, ZOU Wentao. Analysis of the Morphological Characteristics of Height-classified Mytilaria laosensis Seedlings[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2013,(5): 98-102.

参考文献

[1]黄正暾,王顺峰,姜仪民,等.米老排的研究进展及其开发利用前景[J].广西农业科学,2009,40(9):1220-1223.
[2]郭文福,蔡道雄,贾宏炎,等.米老排人工林生长规律的研究[J]. 林业科学研究,2006,19(5):585-589.
[3]梁善庆,罗建举.人工林米老排木材的物理力学性质[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2007,27(5):97-100,116.
[4]林德喜,韩金发,肖正秋,等.米老排对土壤理化性质的改良[J].福建林学院学报,2000,20(1):62-65.
[5]明安刚,于浩龙,陈厚荣,等.广西大青山米老排人工林土壤物理性质[J].应用研究,2010,24(5):71-74.
[6]何伟民,罗南方.米老排苗木生长规律及育苗技术研究[J].山东林业科技,2009(6):61-62.
[7]李良昌,廖翠兰,黄德林,等.米老排在乐昌林场的引种及生长表现[J].广东林业科技,2003,19(4):60-68.
[8]Chen Li,Zeng Jie,Jia Hongyan,et al.Growth and nutrient uptake dynamics of Mytilaria laosensis seedlings under exponential and conventional fertilizations[J].Soil Science and Plant Nutrition,2012,(58):618-626.
[9]明安刚,贾宏炎,陶怡,等.桂西南28年生米老排人工林生物量及其分配特征[J].生态学杂志,2012,31(5):1050-1056.
[10]马跃,谌红辉,李武志,等.望天树苗木分级技术研究[J].西北林学院学报,2012,27(4):153-156.
[11]Dickson A,Leaf A L,Hosner J F.Seedling quality-soil fertility relationships of white spruce,and red and white pine in nurseries[J]. The Forestry Chronicle,1960,36(3):237-241.
[12]贾忠奎,马履一,张林玉,等.白云杉种源早期选择研究[J].种子,2008,27(5):1-6.
[13]周文才,幸伟年,黄文印,等.红花油茶嫁接苗木质量评价[J].经济林研究,2012,30(3):96-99.
[14]刘勇.苗木质量调控理论与技术[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1999.
[15]邵芳丽,宫渊波,关灵,等.不同水氮条件对岷江柏幼苗生长的影响[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(1):45-50.
[16]唐小燕,袁位高,沈爱华,等.闽楠容器苗评价指标及分级标准研究[J].浙江林业科技,2011,31(6):39-44.
[17]史富强,杨斌,付玉嫔,等.铁力木造林苗木分级标准及施肥试验研究[J].林业调查规划,2010,35(5):28-30.
[18]李国雷,祝燕,李庆梅,等.红松苗龄型对苗木质量和造林效果的影响[J].林业科学,2012,48(1):35-41.