国外森林结构属性公众偏好的影响因素研究进展

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2018.03.023

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

森林结构属性是林业科学研究的热点之一,从公众偏好视角研究森林结构属性有利于优化森林旅游产品的供给侧结构,扩大生态公共产品的供给。基于Science Direct数据库,以国外森林结构属性公众偏好为研究对象,在对其研究历程、研究方法、案例地分布总结的基础上,基于“人-地-环境”森林结构属性公众偏好影响框架,综述了社会人口学特征、地理区域、人类活动及情境环境等四大因素对公众森林结构属性偏好影响的研究进展,展望了未来我国森林结构属性公众偏好研究的可能路径。

关键词: 森林结构属性, 公众偏好, 社会人口学特征, 地理区域, 人类活动, 情境环境

Abstract:

The attribute of forest structure is the one of hot topics in forestry research.Study on the attributes of forest structure from the perspective of public preference would optimize the supply-side reform of forest tourism product and extend the supply of ecological public product.Based on the Science Direct database,this paper took the public preference of foreign forest structural attributes as the research object,reviewed the research progress,methods and case distribution and summarized the impact of geographical factors,social groups,human activities and contextual environment factors on the public preference of forest structure attributes under the framework between human,place and environment.Finally,the available paths of public preference research on forest structural attributes in the future is studied.

Key words: forest structure attributes, public preference, demographic characteristics, geographical region, humanactivity, contextual environment

中图分类号:

S718.5

罗芬, 李雪丽, 李书献, 何嘉文. 国外森林结构属性公众偏好的影响因素研究进展[J]. 林业资源管理, 2018,(3): 133-140.

LUO Fen, LI Xueli, LI Shuxian, HE Jiawen. Literature Review on Factors of Public Preference on Forest Structure Attributes[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2018,(3): 133-140.

图/表 1

参考文献 57

[1]	习近平. 习近平谈治国理政[M]. 北京: 外文出版社, 2014.
[2]	罗芬, 钟永德. 三十年旅游发展对国有林场的影响研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2014,34(5):17-22.
[3]	2017年森林旅游游客量达13.9亿人次[EB/OL]. (2018-01-29)[2018-02-20]. http://www.forestry.gov.cn/main/72/content-1071394.html.
[4]	习近平. 决胜全面建成小康社会夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利[N]. 人民日报, 2017-10-19 (002).
[5]	罗芬, 黄清麟, 张寅, 等. 森林旅游资源分类与调查及评价研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2014,27(6):8-13.
[6]	罗芬, 张安妮, 曲佩宇, 等. 欧洲儿童森林环境教育模式研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报:社会科学版, 2016,10(6):56-61.
[7]	Lee T R. Perceptions,Attitudes and Preferences in Forests and Woodlands[M]. Edinburgh:Forestry Commission, 2001.
[8]	Luo F, Moyle D B, Bao J, et al. The role of institutions in the production of space for tourism:National Forest Parks in China[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2016,70(9):47-55. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.05.021
[9]	Giergiczny M, Czajkowski M, ŻYlicz T, et al. Choice experiment assessment of public preferences for forest structural attributes[J]. Ecological Economics, 2015,119(11):8-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.032
[10]	Edwards D, Jay M, Jensen F S, et al. Public preferences for structural attributes of forests:towards a pan-European perspective[J]. Forest Policy & Economics, 2012,19(3):12-19.
[11]	Jensen F S. Landscape managers' and politicians' perception of the forest and landscape preferences of the population[J]. Forest& Landscape Research, 1993,1(1):79-93.
[12]	Hunziker M, Felber P, Gehring K, et al. Evaluation of Landscape Change by Different Social Groups[J]. Mountain Research & Development, 2008,28(2):140-147.
[13]	Japelj A, Mavsar R, Hodges D, et al. Latent preferences of residents regarding an urban forest recreation setting in Ljubljana,Slovenia[J]. Forest Policy & Economics, 2016,71(10):71-79.
[14]	Gundersen V S, Frivold L H. Public preferences for forest structures:a review of quantitative surveys from Finland,Norway and Sweden[J]. Urban Forestry &Urban Greening, 2008,7(4):241-258.
[15]	Avolio M L, Pataki D E, PPincetl S, et al. Understanding preferences for tree attributes:the relative effects of socio-economic and local environmental factors[J]. Urban Ecosystems, 2015,18(1):73-86. doi: 10.1007/s11252-014-0388-6
[16]	Herzog T R, Kirk K M. Pathway curvature and border visibility as predictors of preference and danger in forest settings[J]. Environment& Behavior, 2005,37(5):620-639.
[17]	Coles R W, Bussey S C, Randrup T B, et al. Urban forest landscapes in the UK-progressing the social agenda[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2000,52(2-3):181-188.
[18]	Junge X, Schüpbach B, Walter T, et al. Aesthetic quality of agricultural landscape elements in different seasonal stages in Switzerland[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2015,133(133):67-77.
[19]	EevaKarjalainen. Scenic preferences concerning clear-fell areas in Finland[J]. Landscape Research, 1996,21(2):159-173. doi: 10.1080/01426399608706483
[20]	Ueda H, Nakajima T, Takayama N, et al. Landscape image sketches of forests in Japan and Russia[J]. Forest Policy & Economics, 2012,19(3):20-30.
[21]	Brush R. Perceiving Environmental Quality:Research and Applications[J]. Environmental Science Research, 1976,9:47-58.
[22]	Knopf R C. Human behavior,cognition,and affect in the natural environment[J]. Behavioural Brain Research, 1993,55(55):101-107. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(93)90012-F
[23]	Brunson M W, Reiter D K. Effects of Ecological Information on Judgments about Scenic Impacts of Timber Harvest[J]. Journal of Forestry, 1996,90(1):31-41.
[24]	Lindhagen A. An approach to clarifying public preferences about silvicultural systems:a case study concerning group selection and clear-cutting[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 1996,11(1-4):375-387. doi: 10.1080/02827589609382950
[25]	Hallikainen V. The Finnish Wilderness Experience[R]. Finland:The Finnish Forest Research Institute, 1998.
[26]	Van Den Berg A, Vlek C, Coetherier F. Group differences in aesthetic evaluation of nature development plans:a multilevel approach[J]. J.Environ.Psychol, 1998,18(2):141-157.
[27]	Tahvanainen L, TyrväInen L, Ihalainen M, et al. Forest management and public perceptions-visual versus verbal information[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2001,53(1):53-70.
[28]	Edwards D, Jay M, Jensen F, et al. Deliverable D2.3.3:Public preferences for silvicultural attributes of European forests[R]. Projet Eforwood, 2014.
[29]	Groot R D, Ramakrishnan P S, Van de Berg A, et al. Cultural and amenity services[C]// Hassan R M,Scholes R,Ash N.Ecosystems and Human Well-Being,Volume 1:Current State and Trends:Cultural and Amenity Services. Washington DC:IslandPress,Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005.
[30]	Kaplan R, Kaplan S, Brown T. Environmental preference:a comparison of four domains of predictors[J]. Environment & Behavior, 1989,21(5):509-530.
[31]	BallingJ D, Falk J H. Developmentof visual preference for natural environments[J]. Environment& Behavior, 1982,14(1):5-28.
[32]	TryväInen L, Pauleit S, SeelandK. Benefits and Uses of Urban Forests and Trees[M]. Springer Berlin Heidelberg:Urban Forests and Trees, 2005:81-114.
[33]	Kardell L. Clearcuts-do they have to be ugly?[J]. Sveriges Skogsvardsforbunds Tidskrift, 1978,76(3/4):385-433.
[34]	Silvennoinen H, Pukkala T, Tahvanainen L. Effect of Cuttings on the Scenic Beauty of a Tree Stand[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2002,17(3):263-273. doi: 10.1080/028275802753742936
[35]	Ribe R G. The aesthetics of forestry:What has empirical preference research taught us?[J]. Environmental Management, 1989,13(1):55-74. doi: 10.1007/BF01867587
[36]	Hultman S G. Public judgement of forest environments as recreation areas,1:Judgement on site or from photos?[J]. Molecular Brain Research, 1997,48(1):107-125. doi: 10.1016/s0169-328x(97)00088-0 pmid: 9379830
[37]	ForanB, WardleK. Transitions in land use and the problems of planning:a case study from the mountainlands of New Zealand[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 1995,43(2):97-127. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4797(95)90101-9
[38]	Soliva R, Hunziker M. Beyond the visual dimension:Using ideal type narratives to analyse people’s assessments of landscape scenarios[J]. Land Use Policy, 2009,26(2):284-294. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.03.007
[39]	Jensen F S, Koch N E. Measuring forest preferences of the population—a Danish approach[J]. SchweizerischeZeitschrift Fur Forstwesen, 1998,151:11-16.
[40]	Schraml U, Volz K R. Do species matter? Valuable broadleaves as an object of public perception and policy[J]. Valuable Broadleaved Forests in Europe, 2009,1(1):213-236.
[41]	Mudrak L Y. Urban resident’s landscape preferences:A method for their assessment[J]. Urban Ecology, 1983,1(7):91-123.
[42]	Val G D L F D, Hermann M S. Visual quality:An examination of a South American Mediterranean landscape,Andean foothills east of Santiago (Chile)[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2014,13(2):261-271.
[43]	Karjalainen E. Scenic preferences concerning clear-fell areas in Finland[J]. Landscape Research, 1996,21(2):159-173. doi: 10.1080/01426399608706483
[44]	Becker R H. Opinions about clear-cutting and recognition of clear-cuts by forest recreation visitors[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 1983,17(2):171-177.
[45]	Brunson M, Shelby B. Assessing recreational and scenic quality:How does New Forestry rate[J]. Journal of Forestry, 1992,90(7):37-41.
[46]	Brown T C, Daniel T C. Modeling forest scenic beauty:Concepts and application to ponderosa pine[R]. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, 1984:1-35.
[47]	Hörnsten L, FredmanP.On the distance to recreational forests in Sweden[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2000,51(1):1-10.
[48]	Rametsteiner E, Kraxner F. Europeans and their forests:what do Europeans think about forests and sustainable forest management?[R]. Vienna:Ministerial conference on the protection of forest in Europe, 2003.
[49]	Axelsson-Lindgren C. Forest aesthetics[M]. Helsinki:Multiple-use forestry in the Nordic countries,METLA,The Finnish Forest Research Institute, 1995:279-294.
[50]	Ward-Thompson C, BoydF.Review of research in landscape and woodland perceptions,aesthetics and experience[M]. Edinburgh:Landscape Design and Research Unit, 1998.
[51]	Hay R. Sense of place in developmental context[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1998,18(1):5-29. doi: 10.1006/jevp.1997.0060
[52]	Hoffenberg P H. Landscape,Memory and the Australian War Experience,1915-18[J]. Journal of Contemporary History, 2001,36(1):111-131. doi: 10.1177/002200940103600105
[53]	PræstholmS, Jensen F S, Hasler B, et al. Forests improve qualities and values of local areas in Denmark[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2002,1(2):97-106.
[54]	Bell S. Landscape pattern,perception and visualisation in the visual management of forests[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2001,54(1):201-211.
[55]	Silvennoien H, Alho J, et al. Prediction models of landscape preferences at the forest stand level[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2001,56(1):11-20. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00163-3
[56]	Jensen F S. Changes in the forest preferences of the Danish population from 1977 to 1994[J]. Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute, 1997,15(26):213-236.
[57]	Palmer J F. Stability of landscape perceptions in the face of landscape change[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 1997,37(1-2):109-113.