抚育间伐对福建千年桐-闽楠混交林磷含量的影响

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2024.02.008

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

明确抚育间伐对千年桐-闽楠混交林的磷动态结构干扰机制,为千年桐-闽楠混交林土壤磷素的科学管理提供依据。以福建南平范桥国有林场5 a生千年桐和闽楠为对象,测定其土壤全磷、有效磷含量以及枝、叶、干、根全磷含量,研究抚育间伐对其根际土和营养器官磷含量的影响。结果表明:1)千年桐与闽楠根际磷富集作用明显,其抚育间伐前后根际土全磷和有效磷含量均显著高于非根际土(P<0.05),抚育间伐使千年桐和闽楠根际土全磷和有效磷含量得到显著提高(P<0.05),在0~15 cm土壤深度,随着土壤深度增加,千年桐和闽楠根际土全磷和有效磷含量均呈上升的趋势。2)千年桐不同土壤深度根际土全磷与有效磷含量在抚育间伐前后均高于闽楠,抚育间伐后千年桐与闽楠不同土壤深度根际土全磷含量的差值与有效磷含量的差值均增大,抚育间伐提高了千年桐与闽楠枝、叶、干、根全磷含量,在抚育间伐前后,千年桐枝、叶、干、根全磷含量均高于闽楠。3)相关性分析表明,千年桐和闽楠根际土有效磷与根全磷、叶全磷均为显著正相关(P<0.05),其根全磷与叶全磷也显著正相关(P<0.05)。抚育间伐提高了千年桐和闽楠营养器官与根际土磷含量,对非根际土磷含量影响较小,对千年桐和闽楠根际土壤磷活化吸收有促进影响;抚育间伐对千年桐的影响程度大于闽楠,千年桐根系比闽楠更发达,具有更强的土壤磷活化能力。

关键词: 抚育间伐, 千年桐, 闽楠, 根际, 土壤磷

Abstract:

The disturbance mechanism of phosphorus dynamic structure by tending cutting in the mixed forest of Vernicia montana and Phoebe bournei was clarified,providing a basis for the scientific management of soil phosphorus in this forest.Total phosphorus and available phosphorus content in soil and total phosphorus in branches,leaves,stems and roots of five year old Vernicia montana and Phoebe bournei from Fanqiao State-owned Forest Farm,Nanping,were determined.The impact of tending cutting on phosphorus content in rhizosphere soil and vegetative organs was studied.The results show that:1)Rhizosphere phosphorus enrichment was evident in both Vernicia montana and Phoebe bournei.Total phosphorus and available phosphorus levels in the rhizosphere soil were significantly higher than in non-rhizosphere soil before and after tending cutting(P<0.05).Tending cutting increased total phosphorus and available phosphorus in the rhizosphere soil(P<0.05).At a depth of 0-15 cm,rhizosphere soil phosphorus levels increased with depth for both species.2)Vernicia montana had higher total phosphorus and available phosphorus in rhizosphere soil at different soil depths compared to Phoebe bournei before and after tending cutting.After tending cutting,both total phosphorus content difference and available phosphorus content difference of rhizosphere soil increased at different soil depths of Vernicia montana and Phoebe bournei.The content of total phosphorus in branches,leaves,stems and roots of Vernicia montana and Phoebe bournei were increased by tending cutting.The content of total phosphorus in branches,leaves,stems and roots of Vernicia montana was higher than that of Phoebe bournei before and after tending cutting.3)Correlation analysis showed a significant positive correlation between available phosphorus in rhizosphere soil and total phosphorus in roots and leaves of Vernicia montana and Phoebe bournei(P<0.05),as wll as a significant positive correlation between total phosphorus in roots and total phosphorus in leaves(P<0.05).Tending cutting increased phosphorus content in vegetative organs and rhizosphere soil,with little effect on non-rhizosphere soil phosphorus.It promotes phosphorus activation and absorption in the rhizosphere soil of both.The effect of tending cutting on Vernicia montana was greater than on Phoebe bournei.The Vernicia montana root system is more developed than that of Phoebe bournei,granting it a stronger ability of soil phosphorus activation.

Key words: tending cutting, Vernicia montana, Phoebe bournei, rhizosphere, soil phosphorus

中图分类号:

S718.5

郑凌羽, 李伟煌, 许丙岩, 王英姿, 洪滔. 抚育间伐对福建千年桐-闽楠混交林磷含量的影响[J]. 林草资源研究, 2024,(2): 59-67.

ZHENG Lingyu, LI Weihuang, XU Bingyan, WANG Yingzi, HONG Tao. Effect of Tending Cutting on Phosphorus Content in Mixed Forest of Vernicia montana and Phoebe bournei in Fujian Province[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2024,(2): 59-67.

图/表 9

表1

表2

图1

表3

图2

图3

图4

表4

图5

参考文献 38

[1]	曹升, 胡华英, 张虹, 等. 我国南方人工林土壤有效磷匮乏原因及对策分析[J]. 世界林业研究, 2019, 32(3):78-84.
[2]	赵琼, 曾德慧. 陆地生态系统磷素循环及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005(1):153-163. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0020
[3]	ZHOU Kaijun, LU Xiankai, MORI T, et al. Effects of long-term nitrogen deposition on phosphorus leaching dynamics in a mature tropical forest[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2018, 138(2):215-224.
[4]	冯玉龙, 王文章, 陈杰. 长白落叶松与水曲柳磷素营养关系的研究[J]. 林业科学, 2000(2):20-25.
[5]	张鼎华, 林开淼, 李宝福. 杉木、马尾松及其混交林根际土壤磷素特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(11):2815-2821.
[6]	陈永亮, 韩士杰, 周玉梅, 等. 胡桃楸、落叶松纯林及其混交林根际土壤有效磷特性的研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002(7):790-794.
[7]	周志春, 谢钰容, 金国庆, 等. 马尾松种源对磷肥的遗传反应及根际土壤营养差异[J]. 林业科学, 2003(6):62-67.
[8]	RUSSELL S E, LIU HEPING, THISTLE H, et al. Effects of thinning a forest stand on sub-canopy turbulence[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2018,248:295-305.
[9]	林娜, 刘勇, 李国雷, 等. 抚育间伐对人工林凋落物分解的影响[J]. 世界林业研究, 2010, 23(3):44-47.
[10]	林晗, 洪陈洁, 洪滔, 等. 不同内生真菌对千年桐幼苗生长及主要矿质元素的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2016, 37(9):1799-1804.
[11]	苏春莉, 段姚, 顾振瀛, 等. 水分胁迫对闽楠幼苗生理及光合特性的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2022, 42(6):85-92.
[12]	颜晓军, 苏达, 郑朝元, 等. 长期施肥对酸性土壤磷形态及有效性的影响[J]. 土壤, 2020, 52(6):1139-1144.
[13]	ZHOU Chuifan, KATE H, MULUALEM T, et al. Biochar addition to forest plantation soil enhances phosphorus availability and soil bacterial community diversity[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2020,455:117635.
[14]	林巧玉, 曾泉鑫, 元晓春, 等. 氮添加对亚热带黄山松林土壤磷组分的影响[J]. 林业科学研究, 2022, 35(4):170-178.
[15]	王晓荣, 雷蕾, 曾立雄, 等. 抚育间伐对马尾松林土壤活性有机碳的短期影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(4):1049-1061.
[16]	刘晴, 徐阳, 张妍, 等. 抚育间伐对辽东山区红松人工林土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 森林工程, 2021, 37(3):67-71.
[17]	AMANDA C S, SAIJA H, NILS F, et al. Select or Not? Comparing the impact of selective and schematic thinning on scots pine tree growth and stand structure[J]. Forests, 2023, 14(6):1194.
[18]	潘军, 宋乃平, 吴旭东, 等. 荒漠草原不同种植年限人工柠条林土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2015, 41(2):160-168.
[19]	国家林业局. 森林土壤磷的测定:LY/T 1232—2015[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2015.
[20]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[21]	卢鑫, 张丽静, 王瑞, 等. 玛曲高寒沙化草地3种灌木根际土壤磷素含量特征[J]. 草业科学, 2012, 29(2):167-173.
[22]	范晓晖, 刘芷宇. 根际pH环境与磷素利用研究进展[J]. 土壤通报, 1992(5):238-241.
[23]	TANG Zichao, JIANG Yanxue, WANG Chenchen, et al. New insight into phosphorus release of rhizosphere soil in the water level fluctuation zone[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(8):6635.
[24]	赵苏亚. 抚育间伐对杉木人工林土壤微生物和理化性质的影响[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2021.
[25]	TRENTINI C P, CAMPANELLO P I, VILLAGRA M, et al. Thinning of loblolly pine plantations in subtropical Argentina:Impact on microclimate and understory vegetation[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2017,384:236-247.
[26]	周运红, 李建亮, 王利东, 等. 间伐对华北落叶松林凋落物分解的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2021, 43(12):29-37.
[27]	马芳芳, 贾翔, 赵卫, 等. 间伐强度对辽东落叶松人工林土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(4):971-977.
[28]	SELIG M F, SEILER J R, TYREE M C. Soil carbon and CO₂ efflux as influenced by the thinning of Loblolly Pine(Pinus taeda L.) plantations on the piedmont of Virginia[J]. Forest Science, 2008, 54(1):58-66.
[29]	杨丽韫, 李文华. 长白山原始阔叶红松林细根分布及其周转的研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2005(2):1-5.
[30]	单建平, 陶大立. 国外对树木细根的研究动态[J]. 生态学杂志, 1992(4):48-51.
[31]	王进, 朱江, 艾训儒, 等. 湖北星斗山地形变化对不同生活型植物叶功能性状的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(5):447-457. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2018.0228
[32]	马瑞婷, 董晓明, 靳珊珊, 等. 间伐对栓皮栎人工林林下荆条根茎叶主要功能性状的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2021, 38(3):567-576.
[33]	徐冰, 程雨曦, 甘慧洁, 等. 内蒙古锡林河流域典型草原植物叶片与细根性状在种间及种内水平上的关联[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(1):29-38. doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.01.006
[34]	PIETERS A J, PAUL M J, LAWLOR D W. Low sink demand limits photosynthesis under P(i)deficiency[J]. Journal of experimental botany, 2001, 52(358):1083-1091.
[35]	REICH P B. The world-wide ‘fast-slow’ plant economics spectrum:A traits manifesto[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2014, 102(2):275-301.
[36]	牛瑞龙, 高星, 徐福利, 等. 秦岭中幼林龄华北落叶松针叶与土壤的碳氮磷生态化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(22):7384-7392.
[37]	陈壹铭, 单立山, 马静, 等. 西北干旱区荒漠植物叶片和细根碳、氮、磷化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(9):1-12.
[38]	赵厚本, 周光益, 李兆佳, 等. 南亚热带常绿阔叶林4个常见树种的生物量分配特征与异速生长模型[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(2):23-31.

样木	林分密度/ (株/hm²)	平均胸径/ cm	平均树高/ m	生长状况
千年桐	445	6.40	5.96	旺盛
闽楠	575	2.18	2.62	旺盛

测试项目	抚育间伐前	抚育间伐后
根际土全磷/(mg/g)	0.16±0.035Aa	0.25±0.044Ab
非根际土全磷/(mg/g)	0.026±0.015Ba	0.030±0.009 8Ba
全磷富集率/%	515.38	733.33
根际土有效磷/(mg/g)	0.015±0.006 7Aa	0.031±0.009 5Ab
非根际土有效磷/(mg/g)	0.000 90±0.000 87Ba	0.001 20±0.000 80Ba
有效磷富集率/%	1 566.67	2 483.33

测试项目	抚育间伐前	抚育间伐后
根际土全磷/(mg/g)	0.096±0.016Aa	0.14±0.021Ab
非根际土全磷/(mg/g)	0.026±0.015Ba	0.030±0.009 8Ba
全磷富集率/%	269.23	366.67
根际土有效磷/(mg/g)	0.012±0.002 2Aa	0.020±0.003 6Ab
非根际土有效磷/(mg/g)	0.000 90±0.000 87Ba	0.001 20±0.000 80Ba
有效磷富集率/%	1 233.33	1 566.67

测试项目	抚育间伐前	抚育间伐后	测试项目	抚育间伐前	抚育间伐后
千年桐枝/(mg/g)	0.94±0.11Aa	1.20±0.21Ab	闽楠枝/(mg/g)	0.74±0.10Ba	0.84±0.14Ba
千年桐叶/(mg/g)	1.39±0.33Aa	1.78±0.52Aa	闽楠叶/(mg/g)	1.37±0.31Aa	1.61±0.29Aa
千年桐干/(mg/g)	0.50±0.23Aa	0.71±0.19Aa	闽楠干/(mg/g)	0.40±0.17Aa	0.59±0.16Aa
千年桐根/(mg/g)	1.89±0.22Aa	2.56±0.47Ab	闽楠根/(mg/g)	1.64±0.16Aa	2.06±0.25Bb