间伐后混交不同比例亮叶桦和毛竹对杉木生长的影响

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2024.02.015

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

科学合理的混交能够恢复土壤地力,提高林分生产力,改善低质低效林,实现对杉木人工林的科学高效经营。通过对杉木人工林进行抚育间伐,以不同混交比例营造杉木-亮叶桦(1杉1桦、2杉1桦、3杉1桦)和杉木-毛竹(1杉1毛、2杉1毛、3杉1毛)混交林,探究混交对杉木个体生长特征和功能性状的影响。结果表明:1)与纯林相比,混交增加了林木竞争强度;杉木与亮叶桦混交时的林木竞争强度小于与毛竹混交。2)杉木与亮叶桦、毛竹混交均提高了杉木的叶面积指数。3)随杉木保留密度的增加,土壤中速效氮、有效磷和有机质含量随之下降;相比纯林,混交使土壤速效氮含量下降,但提高了土壤有效磷含量。4)杉木单株材积随杉木保留密度的增加而下降,林分蓄积反之。杉木-亮叶桦、杉木-毛竹混交林中,杉木单株材积和林分蓄积均高于自身纯林;杉木-亮叶桦混交林中杉木单株材积和林分蓄积同样大于杉木-毛竹混交林。5)Hegyi竞争指数与杉木单株材积呈极显著负相关(P<0.01);杉木单株材积与叶面积呈显著正相关(P<0.05);有效磷与单株材积和林分蓄积呈极显著正相关(P<0.01),土壤有机质含量与林分蓄积呈显著正相关(P<0.05)。综上,杉木-亮叶桦混交林在各方面要优于杉木-毛竹混交林;且杉木与亮叶桦混交比为1∶1时,对杉木单株生长促进效果最佳,有利于杉木大径材培育,促进杉木林分质量的提高;同时应兼顾林分产量,杉木与亮叶桦混交比为3∶1时,其杉木林分蓄积实现最大化。

关键词: 杉木, Hegyi竞争指数, 叶面积指数, 有效磷, 林分蓄积

Abstract:

Scientifically reasonable mixed planting can restore soil fertility,enhance forest productivity,improve low-quality and low-efficiency forests,and achieve scientifically efficient management of Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations.By conducting forest thinning in Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations,mixed forests can be created with different proportions of Cunninghamia lanceolata and other species such as Betula luminifera or Phyllostachys edulis.This includes combinations with ratios of Cunninghamia lanceolata to Betula luminifera or Betula luminifera at 1∶1,2∶1,and 3∶1,respectively.The objective is to investigate the effects of mixed planting on the growth characteristics and functional traits of Cunninghamia lanceolata individuals.The results indicate that:1)Compared to pure forests,mixed planting increases the intensity of competition among trees.Additionally,the competition intensity between Cunninghamia lanceolata and Betula luminifera in mixed forests is lower than that between Cunninghamia lanceolata and Phyllostachys edulis.2)Mixed planting of Cunninghamia lanceolata with Betula luminifera and Phyllostachys edulis both increase the leaf area index(LAI)of Cunninghamia lanceolata.3)With the increase in Cunninghamia lanceolata retention density,the contents of available nitrogen,available phosphorus,and organic matter in the soil decrease.Compared to pure forests,mixed planting leads to a decrease of available nitrogen content in the soil but an increase in available phosphorus.4)As the retention density of Cunninghamia lanceolata increases,the individual tree volume of Cunninghamia lanceolata decreases,while the total stand volume increases in contrast.In Cunninghamia lanceolata mixed forests with Betula luminifera and Phyllostachys edulis,both the individual tree volume and the stand volume of Cunninghamia lanceolata are higher than those in pure forests of Cunninghamia lanceolata alone.In Cunninghamia lanceolata mixed forests with Betula luminifera,the individual tree volume and stand volume of Cunninghamia lanceolata are similarly greater than those in mixed forests with Phyllostachys edulis.5)The Hegyi competition index shows a highly significant negative correlation with the individual volume of Cunninghamia lanceolata(P<0.01);the individual volume of Cunninghamia lanceolata is significantly positively correlated with leaf area(P<0.05);available phosphorus is highly significantly positively correlated with individual volume and stand volume(P<0.01),and soil organic matter content is significantly positively correlated with stand volume(P<0.05).Based on the above findings,Cunninghamia lanceolata mixed forests with Betula luminifera are superior to those with Phyllostachys edulis in various aspects.Additionally,when the ratio of Cunninghamia lanceolata to Betula luminifera is 1∶1,it has the best promoting effect on the individual growth of Cunninghamia lanceolata,which is beneficial for cultivating large-diameter Cunninghamia lanceolata and improving stand quality.At the same time,attention should be paid to stand yield.When the ratio of Cunninghamia lanceolata to Betula luminifera is 3∶1,the stand volume of Cunninghamia lanceolata is maximized.

Key words: Cunninghamia lanceolata, Hegyi competition index, leaf area index, available phosphorus, stand volume

中图分类号:

S756.9

孙昆, 吴大瑜, 孙洪刚. 间伐后混交不同比例亮叶桦和毛竹对杉木生长的影响[J]. 林草资源研究, 2024,(2): 124-132.

SUN Kun, WU Dayu, SUN Honggang. Effects of Mixed Betula luminifera and Phyllostachys edulis with Different Proportions on the Growth of Cunninghamia lanceolata after Thinning[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2024,(2): 124-132.

图/表 7

表1

图1

图2

表2

图3

图4

表3

参考文献 45

[1]	杨承栋. 发展有群落结构混交林是维护、恢复和提高森林土壤功能实现人工林可持续经营的关键技术[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(8):26-40.
[2]	林武星, 叶功富, 徐俊森, 等. 木麻黄-湿地松人工混交林中树木个体生长的竞争效应模型[J]. 林业科学, 2003, 39(S1):42-46.
[3]	FORRESTER D I. Linking forest growth with stand structure:Tree size inequality,tree growth or resource partitioning and the asymmetry of competition[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2019,447:139-157.
[4]	GOISSER M, GEPPERT U, ROTZER T, et al. Does belowground interaction with Fagus sylvatica increase drought susceptibility of photosynthesis and stem growth in Picea abies?[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2016,375:268-278.
[5]	林思祖, 黄世国, 洪伟. 杉阔混交林杉木与其混交树种种间竞争研究[J]. 林业科学, 2004, 40(2):160-164.
[6]	曹永慧, 李生, 陈存及, 等. 乳源木莲杉木混交林生长及其竞争关系分析[J]. 林业科学, 2005, 41(5):201-206.
[7]	何贵平, 陈益泰, 余元华, 等. 南酸枣人工林早期生长特性及其与杉木混交效应研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2004, 17(2):206-212.
[8]	陈清根. 桉树采伐后改造成桉杉混交林的效应研究[J]. 桉树科技, 2018, 35(4):14-19.
[9]	国家林业和草原局. 中国森林资源报告(2017—2018)[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2019.
[10]	张勰, 徐清乾, 许忠坤, 等. 湖南省杉木人工林近自然经营效果研究[J]. 湖南林业科技, 2018, 45(2):18-23.
[11]	秦义建, 余朝建, 李新田, 等. 杉木光皮桦混交林效益的调查研究[J]. 广西林业科学, 2000(4):189-191.
[12]	周静, 袁华明, 李佳泳, 等. 杉木—光皮桦混交林对微生物量碳氮与酶活性的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2015, 43(3):83-86.
[13]	刘芳. 杉木光皮桦纯林及混交林生物量[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2002(2):33-37.
[14]	刘和丁. 杉木与光皮桦纯林及混交林土壤理化性质分析[J]. 福建林业, 2017(1):33-35.
[15]	蔡亮, 张瑞霖, 李春福, 等. 基于竹鞭状态分析的抑制毛竹林扩散的方法[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2003(5):68-70.
[16]	何杏珍. 毛竹低产林改造效果研究[J]. 世界竹藤通讯, 2017, 15(4):36-38.
[17]	王晓荣, 胡兴宜, 龚苗, 等. 毛竹扩张对幕阜山区森林土壤碳氮磷含量及生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 44(2):77-85.
[18]	严淑娴, 刘茗, 刘彩霞, 等. 毛竹纯林土壤微生物多样性高于杉木纯林[J]. 土壤学报, 2022, 59(6):1704-1717.
[19]	周亚琦, 董杰, 官凤英, 等. 竹阔混交林研究进展与展望[J]. 林业资源管理, 2016(3):145-150.
[20]	刘敬灶. 2种毛竹混交林生长量与土壤理化性质分析[J]. 竹子学报, 2022, 41(1):55-59.
[21]	李少青. 毛竹杉木混交造林对土壤养分及林木生长的影响[J]. 现代园艺, 2014(18):10-11.
[22]	刘志理, 金光泽, 周明. 利用直接法和间接法测定针阔混交林叶面积指数的季节动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(8):843-856. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00079
[23]	马泽清, 刘琪璟, 曾慧卿, 等. 南方人工林叶面积指数的摄影测量[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(5):1971-1980.
[24]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[25]	刘景芳, 童书振. 编制杉木林分密度管理图研究报告[J]. 林业科学, 1980(4):241-251.
[26]	毛志忠. 浙江省立木材积表的编制[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 1988(1):78-83.
[27]	陈双林, 吴柏林, 虞敏之, 等. 毛竹材积主要构件因子关系研究及材积表编制[J]. 福建林业科技, 2008, 143(2):30-33.
[28]	杜秀芳, 汤孟平, 潘建勇, 等. 临安区不同森林类型竞争指数比较研究[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(12):4064-4072.
[29]	封磊, 洪伟, 吴承祯, 等. 杉木-观光木人工混交林林木竞争效应研究[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2008, 16(6):505-510.
[30]	林晗, 吴承祯, 陈辉, 等. 杉木-千年桐人工混交林种内种间竞争关系分析[J]. 福建林学院学报, 2014, 34(4):316-321.
[31]	曹小玉, 李际平, 委霞. 亚热带典型林分空间结构与林下草本物种多样性的差异特征分析及其关联度[J]. 草业科学, 2019, 36(10):2466-2475.
[32]	JAVIER D, MARTA P, RAFAEL C. Interannual variability in competitive effects in mixed and monospecific forests of Mediterranean stone pine[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2015,358:230-239.
[33]	李轩然, 刘琪璟, 蔡哲, 等. 千烟洲针叶林的比叶面积及叶面积指数[J]. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(1):93-101.
[34]	ZHU Junqi, VAN der W W, ANTEN N P R, et al. The contribution of phenotypic plasticity to complementary light capture in plant mixtures[J]. New Phytologist, 2015, 207(4):1213-1222. doi: 10.1111/nph.13416 pmid: 25898768
[35]	李生, 陈存及. 混交林分中乳源木莲冠层特性与生长的通径分析[J]. 林业科学研究, 2005, 18(3):310-314.
[36]	NELSON A S, WAGNER R G, DAY M E, et al. Light absorption and light-use efficiency of juvenile white spruce trees in natural stands and plantations[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2016,376:158-165.
[37]	JUCKER T, BOURIAUD O, AVACARITEI D, et al. Competition for light and water play contrasting roles in driving diversity-productivity relationships in Iberian forests[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2014, 102(5):1202-1213.
[38]	ORELLANA E, VANCLAY J K. Competition and dominance between angiosperms and Araucaria angustifolia(Bert.) O.Kuntze in the Atlantic Forest in southern Brazil[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2018,425:119-125.
[39]	刘蕾, 申国珍, 陈芳清, 等. 神农架海拔梯度上4种典型森林凋落物现存量及其养分循环动态[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(7):2142-2149.
[40]	CHENG Chuanpeng, WANG Yidong, FU Xiaoli, et al. Thinning effect on understory community and photosynthetic characteristics in a subtropical Pinus massoniana plantation[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2017,47:1104-1115.
[41]	石昊楠, 李伟坡, 李智华, 等. 不同混交比例的杉阔混交林对林下物种多样性和土壤养分的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2022, 42(12):34-41.
[42]	王龙凤, 赵丽宏, 肖伟伟, 等. 阔叶树种混交对红松人工林土壤养分的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2022, 50(4):27-31.
[43]	林强. 杉木人工林皆伐对林地径流水化学特性影响的研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2001, 9(3):25-27.
[44]	董雪婷, 张静, 张志东, 等. 树种相互作用、林分密度和树木大小对华北落叶松生产力的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(8):2722-2728. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202108.006
[45]	张培, 庞圣江, 杨保国, 等. 不同混交模式对桉树林分生长、凋落物量和土壤养分的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(2):31-37.

类型	树种组成	林龄/a	每公顷保留杉木株数/个	每公顷伐除杉木株数/个	每公顷混交树种株数/个
1杉1桦	混交林	23/9	156	2 183	156
2杉1桦			278	2 076	156
3杉1桦			500	1 825	156
1杉1毛		23/9	156	2 234	156
2杉1毛			278	2 119	156
3杉1毛			500	1 851	156
CK1	纯林	23	156	2 216
CK2			278	2 130
CK3			500	1 945

类型	速效氮/(mg/kg)	有效磷/(mg/kg)	pH值	有机质/(g/kg)
1杉1桦	383.39±63.45a	4.16±0.46a	4.68±0.18a	182.42±40.16a
2杉1桦	378.25±71.43ab	4.11±0.29a	4.76±0.24a	168.76±43.87a
3杉1桦	366.67±66.97b	4.09±0.36a	4.73±0.15a	154.31±39.65ab
1杉1毛	372.42±52.63b	3.92±0.22ab	4.74±0.29a	155.69±25.48ab
2杉1毛	369.68±59.74b	3.79±0.44ab	4.67±0.28a	135.12±29.33bc
3杉1毛	361.45±68.23bc	3.61±0.51bc	4.70±0.33a	122.55±32.24cd
CK1	398.38±69.35a	3.85±0.52ab	4.81±0.11a	102.14±33.23cd
CK2	384.96±58.51a	3.64±0.34bc	4.70±0.09a	89.32±24.57cd
CK3	377.43±72.05ab	3.17±0.73c	4.75±0.15a	70.43±30.84d

因子	Hegyi	叶面积指数	速效氮	有效磷	pH值	有机质	单株材积	林分蓄积
Hegyi	1
叶面积指数	-0.13	1
速效氮	-0.14	0.18	1
有效磷	-0.26	0.35	-0.13	1
pH值	-0.60	0.09	0.20	0.18	1
有机质	-0.21	0.76^**	0.92^**	-0.16	-0.11	1
单株材积	-0.71^*	0.64^*	0.32	0.83^**	0.31	0.64^*	1
林分蓄积	-0.41	0.27	0.33	0.77^**	0.41	0.53^*	0.36	1