山东典型山地引种火炬松和日本落叶松的群落特征比较分析

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2016.01.015

林业资源管理 ›› 2016›› Issue (1): 84-89.doi: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2016.01.015

山东典型山地引种火炬松和日本落叶松的群落特征比较分析

高远^1,2, 张魁元³, 刘建⁴, 赵卫光⁴

1.临沂大学水土保持与环境保育研究所资源环境学院山东省水土保持与环境保育重点实验室,山东临沂 276005;
2.临沂市科学探索实验室,山东临沂 276037;
3.临港经济开发区第一中学,山东临沂 276624;
4.曲阜师范大学生命科学学院,山东曲阜 273165

收稿日期:2015-10-19 修回日期:2015-11-10 发布日期:2020-11-04
作者简介:高远(1982-),男,山东临沂人,副研究员,主要研究方向为植物多样性。Email:gaoyuan1182@tom.com
基金资助:
临沂市政府决策咨询项目(2015J05和2015X05)

Comparative Analysis on the Community Characteristics of Pinus taeda and Larix kaempferi in Typical Mountainous Region of Shandong Province

GAO Yuan^1,2, ZHANG Kuiyuan³, LIU Jian⁴, ZHAO Weiguang⁴

1. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Water and Soil Conservation and Environmental Protection,Institute of Water and Soil Conservation and Environmental Protection,College of Resources and Environment,Linyi University,Linyi 276005,Shandong,China;
2. Linyi Scientific Exploration Laboratory,Linyi 276037,Shandong,China;
3. Linyi Linguang No.1 Middle School,Linyi 276624,Shandong,China;
4. College of Life Science,Qufu Normal University,Qufu 273165,Shandong,China

Received:2015-10-19 Revised:2015-11-10 Published:2020-11-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 选取山东典型山地(泰山、蒙山和昆嵛山)的11个样方,研究火炬松群落和日本落叶松群落的生长和更新,从种群特征、群落组成和物种多样性3方面评价适应性。结果表明:火炬松群落的乔木、灌木和草本植物种类分别为15种、29种和27种,植株密度分别为(15.38±1.84)株/dam²、(51.50±13.00)株/dam²和(14.38±3.80)株/m²;日本落叶松群落的乔木、灌木和草本植物种类分别为26种、49种和49种,植株密度分别为(10.55±0.97)株/dam²,(37.07±7.99)株/dam²和(25.45±11.35)株/m²。火炬松群落中主要乔木火炬松种群为稳定型、栓皮栎种群为显著增长型、麻栎种群和赤松种群为增长型;日本落叶松群落中主要乔木日本落叶松种群、花楸种群和椴树种群为稳定型,栓皮栎种群为显著增长型。火炬松群落物种丰富度指数和Shannon-Wiener 多样性指数为灌木层>草本层>乔木层,Simpson 多样性指数和Pielou均匀度指数为草本层>灌木层>乔木层;日本落叶松群落物种丰富度指数为灌木层>草本层>乔木层,Shannon-Wiener 多样性指数和Simpson 多样性指数为灌木层>乔木层>草本层,Pielou均匀度指数为草本层>灌木层>乔木层。火炬松群落演替趋势为火炬松林→针阔混交林→麻栎林或栓皮栎林,日本落叶松群落演替趋势为日本落叶松林→针阔混交林→栓皮栎林或杂木林。

关键词: 植物生态学, 火炬松, 日本落叶松, 泰山, 蒙山, 昆嵛山

Abstract: Eleven sample plots from major mountain areas,such as Taishan,Mengshan,and Kunyushan,were selected in Shandong Province to evaluate the growth and renewal of the communities of Pinus taeda and Larix kaempferi.The following three aspects were investigated to determine the adaptability of P.taeda and L.kaempferi in Shandong Province:the population characteristics,the community composition,and the species diversity.The results showed that the species numbers of trees,shrubs,and herbs were 15 species,29 species,and 27 species in the P.taeda community and 26 species,49 species,and 49 species in the L.kaempferi community,respectively.The plant densities of trees,shrubs,and herbs for the P.taeda community were(15.38±1.84)/dam²,(51.50±13.00)/dam²,(14.38±3.80)/m²,and for the L.kaempferi community were(10.55±0.97)/dam²,(37.07±7.99)/dam²,(25.45±11.35)/m².In the P.taeda community,the population of the P.taeda was the stable type,the Quercus variabilis was the significant growth type,the Q.acutissima and the P.densiflora were the growth type.In the L.kaempferi community,the population of the L.kaempferi,Sorbus pohuashanensis,Tilia tuan were the stable type,and the Q.variabilis was the significant growth type.The richness indexes and Shannon-Wiener diversity indexes of the P.taeda community were shrub>herb>tree,Simpson diversity indexes and Pielou evenness indexs were herb>shrub>tree.The richness indexes of the L.kaempferi community was shrub>herb>tree,Shannon-Wiener diversity indexes and Simpson diversity indexes were shrub>tree>herb,Pielou evenness indexs was herb>shrub>tree.The succession tendency of the P.taeda community was P.taeda forest→theropencedrymion→Q.variabilis forest or Q.acutissima forest,and the L.kaempferi community was L.kaempferi forest→theropencedrymion→Q.variabilis forest or mixed forest.

Key words: plant ecology, Pinus taeda, Larix kaempferi, Taishan Mountain, Mengshan Mountain, Kunyushan Mountain

中图分类号:

Q948

高远, 张魁元, 刘建, 赵卫光. 山东典型山地引种火炬松和日本落叶松的群落特征比较分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2016,(1): 84-89.

GAO Yuan, ZHANG Kuiyuan, LIU Jian, ZHAO Weiguang. Comparative Analysis on the Community Characteristics of Pinus taeda and Larix kaempferi in Typical Mountainous Region of Shandong Province[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2016,(1): 84-89.

参考文献

[1] 孙晓梅,张守攻,祁万宜,等.北亚热带高山区日本落叶松造林整地与抚育技术的研究[J].林业科学研究,2007,20(2):235-240.
[2] 朱红燕,王得祥,柴宗政,等.秦岭西段日本落叶松人工林生长规律研究[J].西北林学院学报,2015,30(1):1-7.
[3] 孙英杰,赵爱芬.昆嵛山杉木和火炬松种群的自然更新与群落特征[J].鲁东大学学报:自然科学版,2010,26(1):29-34.
[4] 马少杰,付伟章,李正才,等.泰山南北坡植物物种多样性垂直梯度格局的比较[J].生态科学,2010,29(4):367-374.
[5] 高远,朱孔山,郝加琛,等.山东蒙山 6 种造林树种 40 余年成林效果评价[J].植物生态学报,2013,37(8):728-738.
[6] 杜宁,王琦,郭卫华,等.昆嵛山典型植物群落生态学特征[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(2):151-158.
[7] 方精云,沈泽昊,唐志尧,等.“中国山地植物物种多样性调查计划”及若干技术规范[J].生物多样性,2004,12(1):5-9.
[8] 方精云,王襄平,沈泽昊,等.植物群落清查的主要内容、方法和技术规范[J].生物多样性,2009,17(6):533-548.
[9] 万慧霖,冯宗炜.庐山常绿阔叶林物种组成及其演替趋势[J].生态学报,2008,28(3):1147-1156.
[10] 李立,陈建华,任海保,等.古田山常绿阔叶林优势树种甜槠和木荷的空间格局分析[J].植物生态学报,2010,34(3):241-252.
[11] Tom L,Christina A C.Measuring diversity:the importance of species similarity[J].Ecology,2012,93(3):477-489.
[12] 祝遵凌,火艳,李燕楠.八种木本植物分布区预测及适生性分析与景观应用研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2015,35(6):1-6.
[13] Uriarte M,Swenson N G,Chazdon R L,et al.Trait similarity,shared ancestry and the structure of neighborhood interactions in a subtropical wet forest:implications for community assembly[J].Ecol.Lett.,2010,13:1503-1514.
[14] 王芸芸,师帅,蔺菲,等.长白山阔叶红松林木本植物繁殖特征及其关联性[J].科学通报,2014,59(24):2407-2415.
[15] Kanowski J,Catterall C P,Wardell-Johnson GW,et al.Development of forest structure on cleared rainforest land in eastern Australia under different styles of reforestation[J].Forest Ecol.Manag.,2003,183:265-280.
[16] 刘海丰,薛达元,桑卫国.暖温带森林功能发育过程中的物种扩散和生态位分化[J].科学通报,2014,59(24):2359-2366.
[17] 张殷波,张峰.翅果油树群落结构多样性[J].生态学杂志,2012,31(8):1936-1941.
[18] 程红梅,田锴,田兴军.大蜀山孤岛状山体植被演替阶段物种多样性变化规律[J].生态学杂志,2015,34(7):1830-1837.
[19] 高远,孟凡旭,朱孔山,等.山东孔林主要植物种群和群落特征研究[J].林业资源管理,2015(3):70-77.
[20] 高远,慈海鑫,邱振鲁,等.山东蒙山植物多样性及其海拔梯度格局[J].生态学报,2009,29(12):6377-6384.
[21] 高远,陈玉峰,董恒,等.50 年来山东塔山植被与物种多样性的变化[J].生态学报,2011,31(20):5984-5991.
[22] Guariguata M R,Ostertag R.Neotropical secondary forest succession:changes in structural and functional characteristics[J].Forest Ecol.Manag.,2001,148:185-206.

山东典型山地引种火炬松和日本落叶松的群落特征比较分析

Comparative Analysis on the Community Characteristics of Pinus taeda and Larix kaempferi in Typical Mountainous Region of Shandong Province

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙中元, 王正茂, 曲宏辉, 刘成杰, 吴晓明, 李东芹, 周珊, 李卫兵. 昆嵛山国家级自然保护区森林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 林业资源管理, 2019, 0(3): 99-106.
[2]	白志强, 李缓, 王文栋, 刘端, 韩燕梁, 刘华. 阿尔泰山优势树种的生物量模型构建及其生物量分配特征[J]. 林业资源管理, 2018, 0(4): 34-40.
[3]	高远, 刘建, 赵卫光. 蒙山沟谷次生林群落结构和物种多样性[J]. 林业资源管理, 2017, 0(4): 69-74.
[4]	高远, 孟凡旭, 朱孔山, 郝加琛. 山东孔林主要植物种群和群落特征研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2015, 0(3): 70-77.
[5]	艾尼瓦尔·吐米尔, 张婷, 阿不都拉·阿巴斯. 新疆阿尔泰山两河源国家级自然保护区树附生地衣群落物种分布与环境关系的研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2013, 0(2): 56-63.
[6]	王林, 于晓光, 黄光体. 雨雪冰冻灾害对日本落叶松的影响及植被恢复重建对策——以湖北省恩施市为例[J]. 林业资源管理, 2009, 0(3): 31-33.