The Exploration of Forest Wellness Base Construction

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2017.02.016

Abstract

Abstract:

Development of forest wellness base is only at an early stage in China.This essay addresses some issues of forest wellness base planning.It takes several concepts for forest wellness base as main content and proposes construction suitability evaluation index system,evaluation methodology and rating standard for forest wellness base to determine if the area is suitable to construct a forest wellness base or not.The paper takes the matching of master plan and reasonability of function division into consideration to make feasible spatial arrangements in forest wellness base.It also discusses how to make development of forest wellness products and establish the environmental monitoring system with the view of enhancing core competitiveness of the forest wellness base.

Key words: forest wellness base, assessment, construction

CLC Number:

S788

LIU Zhaowang, WANG Daoyang, QIAO Yongqiang. The Exploration of Forest Wellness Base Construction[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2017, (2): 93-96.

Figures/Tables 2

Tab.1

Suitability evaluation index classification and scores

序号	评价项目	评价指标分级	评分值
1	基地森林覆盖率	65%~75%	5
		55%~65%	4
		≥75% 或者 ≤55%	3
2	天然林比率	≥50%	5
		35%~50%	4
		20%~35%	3
3	森林风景资源质量	≥25分	5
		20~25分	4
		15~20分	3
4	空气负离子含量	≥10000 个/cm³	10
		5000~10000 个/cm³	8
		3000~5000 个/cm³	6
5	空气细菌含量	≤200 cfu/m³	5
		200~450 cfu/m³	4
		450~1000 cfu/m³	3
6	PM2.5	≤30 μg/m³	5
		30~40 μg/m³	4
		40~70 μg/m³	3
7	声环境	昼间 ≤40 dB;夜间≤30 dB	3
7	声环境	昼间 40~50 dB;夜间30~40 dB	2
8	大气质量	达到国家大气环境质量(GB3096-1996)一级标准	2
8	大气质量	达到国家大气环境质量(GB3096-1996)二级标准	1
9	地表水质量	达到国家地表水质量(GB3838-1988)一级标准	2
9	地表水质量	达到国家地表水质量(GB3838-1988)二级标准	1
10	土壤质量	达到国家土壤环境质量(GB1518-1995)一级标准	2
10	土壤质量	达到国家土壤环境质量(GB1518-1995)二级标准	1
11	基地面积	≥1000 hm²	2
		600~100 hm²	1.5
		300~600 hm²	1
12	基地适合康养期	≥230d/a	3
		140~230d/a	2
		≤140d/a	1
13	区位条件	距省会城市(含省级市)小于100 km,或以基地为中心、半径100 km内有100万人口规模的城市	3
		距省会城市(含省级市)或著名旅游区(点)100~200 km	2
		距省会城市(含省级市)或著名旅游区(点)超过200km	1
14	外部交通条件	国道或省道,有交通车随时可达,客流量大	4
14	外部交通条件	省道或县级道路,交通车较多,有一定客流量	3
15	内部交通条件	基地内有多种交通方式可供选择,具备游览的通达性	2
15	内部交通条件	基地内交通方式较为单一	1
16	基础设施条件	自有水源或各区通自来水,有充足变压电供应,有较为完善的内外通讯条件,接待服务设施较好	2
16	基础设施条件	通水、电,有通讯和接待能力,但各类基础设施条件一般	1

Tab.1

Tab.2

适宜性	适宜程度	分值	描述
适宜建设	高适宜	50~60分(含50分)	非常适宜建设,森林康养资源丰富和利用条件优越,限制因素少
	中等适宜	40~50分(含40分)	适宜建设,森林康养资源较丰富和利用条件较好,限制因素少, 应进行资源质量和环境的适当改善
	勉强适宜	35~40分(含35分)	森林康养资源一般和利用条件一般,应首先进行资源质量和环境的较大改善
不适宜建设	不适宜	35分以下	不适宜建设,限制因素大,或者受某项特殊指标限制不适宜建设

[1]	国家林业局. 2015中国森林等自然资源旅游发展报告[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2016: 5.
[2]	李卿 . 森林医学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013: 7.
[3]	GB/T 18005-1999,中国森林风景资源等级评定[S].
[4]	LY/T 2005-1999,国家级森林公园总体规划规范[S].

[1]	LI Huijie, LI Wanting, WANG Bing, NIU Xiang, LIANG Yongliang, LI Jingyao. Assessment of Ecosystem Services in Helan Mountain National Nature Reserve in Ningxia [J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2024, 0(1): 25-33.
[2]	GAO Shanshan, SHEN Yujie, HAI Xinquan. Evaluation of Forest Ecosystem Service Value in Ziwuling, Qingyang Based on Meta-Analysis [J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2023, 0(5): 80-88.
[3]	ZHOU Pu, WANG Ruihui, LIU Kaili, ZHOU Yangchao, SHEN Xing. Quantify Assessment and Management of Phyllostachys edulis in-Forest Landscape Based on SBE Method [J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2023, 0(5): 98-104.
[4]	YANG Xiao, HU Jiping, REN Kailei, RUAN Xiangdong. Evaluation and Optimization of Survey Methods for Ecological Factors about Wild Animals and Their Habitats [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(3): 65-70.
[5]	JIANG Chunying, YANG Xueqing, ZHANG Guoli, SUN Zhichao, JIANG Yun'an, JIANG Aijun. Discussion on the Technical System of Forest Fire Risk Assessment [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(2): 17-26.
[6]	WANG Lin, GAO Jinping, TIAN Haijing, WU Qiang, SHI Junhua, ZHOU Xin, FAN Yunbao, XIE Jingjie. Practice and Discussion on the Construction of "One Map" Intelligent Management Platform for Grassland Resources Management —Take the Intelligent Grassland Management Platform of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps as an Example [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(2): 27-35.
[7]	XI Xiaoxu. The Study on Ecological Landscape Assessment of Fengning Manchu Autonomous County in Hebei Province [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(zk1): 102-108.
[8]	LI Jia, TIAN Yuan, XI Xiaoxu, LIU Jing. Application of Restoration Opportunities Assessment Methodology in China—A Case Study of Fengning Manchu Autonomous County,Hebei Province [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(zk1): 117-125.
[9]	JIANG Jingjian, LI Zirui, NIU Mingyue, HU Weijiang, ZHANG Yong. Service Function Value Assessment of Carbon Sequestration and Oxygen Release of Forest Vegetation in the State-Owned Forest Farms of Zhejiang Province [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(zk1): 66-71.
[10]	ZHANG Quanlin, LIU Lihua, AN Xiongtao, LIU Yang. Exploration on the Assessment of Recreation-Based Forest Resource Assets-Taking Jingangku Forest Farm of Wutai Mountain State-Owned Forest Farm Administration as an Example [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(zk1): 79-84.
[11]	LIU Lijie, XIE Zhuohong, LEI Ming, SHI Yuemou, LI Shengqiang, LIU Ping. Evaluation of Forest Quality Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process —A Case Study in Liuxihe Forest Farm,Guangzhou [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(6): 89-94.
[12]	SUN Linlin, XU Delan, LIU Baoguo. Research on Ecological Sensitivity Evaluation of Yellow River Scenic Area in Zhengzhou [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(6): 95-100.
[13]	MU Tianbao, WU Linna, ZHANG Haitao, ZHANG Han. Information Extraction and Security Risk Assessment of Street Trees Based on Vehicle-Borne LiDAR Data [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(5): 91-98.
[14]	CHENG Ziyue, MA Lan, JIA Xiaojun, ZHANG Miao. Ideas on Standardization Construction of GrasslandRoots Stations [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(4): 8-12.
[15]	WANG Wei, YANG Jing, GAO Xianlian, ZENG Weisheng. Method and Enlightenment of 2020 Global Forest Resources Assessment Remote Sensing Survey [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2021, 0(6): 1-5.