Experimental Design of Silviculture Targeting for Large Diameter Timbers Guided by Forest Vertical Structure

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2019.05.015

Abstract

Abstract:

The harvest of forest management is mainly in large-diameter trees.How to rationally and effectively adjust the structure of forest management stand to form a high productivity stand and take into account the economic and ecological benefits of high-quality target trees is an urgent problem to be solved.Based on the sample plot data of broad-leaved Korean pine forest in Jiaohe,Jilin province,this paper analyzed the vertical structure characteristics of forest,discussed the framework of forest development types,the design mechanism of operation method and the technical elements including full-cycle management,and proposed a design case of Korean pine-large-diameter timber operation method guided by the vertical structure of forest,in order to provide a realistic way for the cultivation of large-diameter timber of broad-leaved Korean pine forest and for forest management.This demencfration provided a model reference for the design of forest management practices.

Key words: vertical structure, large diameter timber, silvicultural systems, experiment design, broad-leaved Korean pine forest

CLC Number:

S757

JIANG Jun, CHEN Beibei, ZHAO Xiuhai, PANG Lifeng. Experimental Design of Silviculture Targeting for Large Diameter Timbers Guided by Forest Vertical Structure[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2019, (5): 89-94.

Figures/Tables 4

Tab.1

Tab.2

Tab.3

Fig.1

References 26

[1]	Oliver C D, Larson B C. Forest Stand Dynamics[M]. New York:McGraw-Hill, 1990: 467-467.
[2]	李俊清, 牛树奎. 森林生态学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006: 291-292.
[3]	惠刚盈, 盛炜彤. 林分直径结构模型的研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 1995,8(2):127-131.
[4]	雷相东, 唐守正. 林分结构多样性指标研究综述[J]. 林业科学, 2002,38(3):140-146. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20020325
[5]	Salas C, LeMay V, Nunez P, et al. Spatial patterns in an old-growth Nothofagus oblique forest in south-central Chile[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006,231:38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.04.037
[6]	Naumburg E, DeWald L E. Relationships between Pinus ponderosa forest structure,light characteristics,and understory graminoid species presence and abundance[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 1999,124(2/3):205-215. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00067-5
[7]	沈国舫. 森林培育学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2001.
[8]	于政中. 森林经理学[M].2版. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1993.
[9]	陆元昌. 近自然森林经营的理论与实践[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006: 66-67.
[10]	范春雨, 张春雨, 赵秀海. 择伐对吉林蛟河阔叶红松林群落结构及动态的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2017,37(20):6668-6678. doi: 10.5846/stxb201607291550
[11]	詹劲昱. 辽宁东部山区森林经营存在问题、对策与建议[J]. 防护林科技, 2017(9):92-94.
[12]	刘淑双. 论内蒙古大兴安岭重点国有林区国家储备林基地建设的必要性[J]. 内蒙古林业调查设计, 2018,41(2):100-101.
[13]	Chen B, Jiang J, Zhao X. Species-area relationship and its scale-dependent effects in natural forests of north eastern China[J]. Forests. 2019,10(5):422. doi: 10.3390/f10050422
[14]	于立忠, 刘利芳, 王绪高, 等. 东北次生林生态系统保护与恢复技术探讨[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017,36(11):3243-3248.
[15]	姜俊, 张春雨, 赵秀海. 吉林蛟河42hm²针阔混交林样地植物种-面积关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012,36(1):30-38. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00030
[16]	赵科, 陶建平, 郝建辉, 等. 海南岛霸王岭热带山地雨林木质藤本垂直结构特征[J]. 生态学报, 2010,30(12):3173-3181.
[17]	王晓明, 陆元昌, 邢海涛, 等. 马尾松-大叶栎混交林皆伐作业法的设计[J]. 林业资源管理, 2017(6):47-53.
[18]	Larsen J B, Nielsen A B. Nature-based forest management—Where are we going?Elaborating forest development types in and with practice[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2007,238(1):107-117. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.087
[19]	李广起, 白帆, 桑卫国. 长白山红松和鱼鳞云杉在分布上限的径向生长对气候变暖的不同响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011,35(5):500-511. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00500
[20]	刘思, 刘超. 紫椴研究综述与展望[J]. 吉林林业科技, 2015,44(2):38-40.
[21]	Masaka K, Sato H, Torita H, et al. Thinning effect on height and radial growth of Pinus thunbergii Parlat.trees with special reference to trunk slenderness in a matured coastal forest in Hokkaido,Japan[J]. Journal of Forest Research, 2013,18(6):475-481. doi: 10.1007/s10310-012-0373-y
[22]	Jang W, Park P S. Stand structure and maintenance of Picea jezoensis in a northern temperate forest,Sou1995th Korea[J]. Journal of Plant Biology, 2010,53(3):180-189. doi: 10.1007/s12374-010-9103-1
[23]	Messier C, Parent S, Bergeron Y. Effects of overstory and understory vegetation on the understory light environment in mixed boreal forests[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 1998,9(4):511-520. doi: 10.2307/3237266
[24]	Montgomery R A, Chazdon R L. Forest structure,canopy architecture,and light transmittance in tropical wet forests[J]. Ecology, 2001,82(10):2707-2718. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2707:FSCAAL]2.0.CO;2
[25]	毛培利, 曹帮华, 田文侠, 等. 人工林生产力年龄效应及衰退机理研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2011,31(11):3208-3214.
[26]	姜俊, 陆元昌, 谢阳生, 等. 基于发展类型理念的多功能人工林经营模式研究[J]. 世界林业研究, 2015,28(3):1-5.

树种	株数/株	平均胸径/cm	平均树高/m	相对优势度/%
紫椴	2765	24.5	17.3	12.19
胡桃楸	213	28.4	18.7	10.6
色木槭	9604	14.4	12.3	17.88
红松	2546	21.8	15.9	12.86
水曲柳	2155	28.7	18.4	11.75
千金榆	1900	8.5	7.5	8.73
其他树种	35469	17.5	11.5	—
全部树种	54652	—	13.2	—

林分层次	胸径/cm	胸高断面积/(m²/hm²)	占总胸高断面积比例/%	单株平均材积/m³	不同径级下的树种个体数比例/%
林分层次	胸径/cm	胸高断面积/(m²/hm²)	占总胸高断面积比例/%	单株平均材积/m³	Ⅰ	Ⅱ	Ⅲ	Ⅳ	Ⅴ
更新层	4.8±0.3a	0.23	0.22	0.012±0.003a	2.8	0.05	—	—	—
下林层	7.1±0.04b	1.89	1.22	0.024±0.0001a	28.8	6.9	0.2	—	—
中林层	15.3±0.11c	55.71	56.41	0.179±0.003b	14.8	32.1	7.7	0.7	0.09
上林层	26.1±0.18c	34.17	33.11	0.359±0.012c	0.3	5.6	6.8	1.7	0.8

样地	2010年作业前林分密度/(株/hm²)	2015作业后年林分密度/(株/hm²)	胸径年生长量/(cm/a)	断面积年平均生长量/(cm²/a)	材积年生长量/(m³/a)
作业样地	1076.5	953.6	0.7a	8.12a	0.0291±0.02262a
对照样地	1349.6	1174.6	0.5b	6.31b	0.0184±0.0149b