An Analysis for the Effectiveness of Termite Control through Large Camphor Seedlings Plantation in Mountainous Areas

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2019.06.024

Abstract

Abstract:

Chemical control of camphor seedlings afforested by termites in Jiaocheng district of Fujian province.The results show that:5% flufiprole,5% Fipronil,3% Carbofuran to control effects of termites on afforestation land were as follows:91.7%,50% and 37.5%,5% flufiprole effective period of the drug is 95 days and the environmental protection effect is relatively good.It can be used for termite control of camphor seedlings in mountainous areas.

Key words: Cinnamomum camphora seedlings, termite harm, flufiprole, control effect, forestation

CLC Number:

S763.7

SHANGGUAN Baoguo. An Analysis for the Effectiveness of Termite Control through Large Camphor Seedlings Plantation in Mountainous Areas[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2019, (6): 137-140.

Figures/Tables 3

Tab.1

Tab.2

Tab.3

References 11

[1]	斐劲松, 胡松林. 抓住白蚁盛发期防治效果好[J]. 湖南林业, 2002(1):24.
[2]	邹树文. 古代文献上白蚁的危害状况及其防治措施[J]. 昆虫知识, 1963(3):110-115.
[3]	戴玉斌. 樟树白蚁的林间环保防治效果初探[J]. 华东森林经理, 2011,25(3):59-61.
[4]	陈顺立, 林庆源, 黄金聪. 南方主要树种害虫综合管理[M]. 厦门: 厦门大学出版社, 2004.
[5]	中华人民共和国农业部公告第1157号[EB/OL].(2009-02-08)[2019-09-17]. http://www.moa.gov.cn/gk/tzgg_1/gg/200902/t20090227_1226994.htm.
[6]	丁明, 钟冬莲, 汤富彬, 等. 固相萃取/液质联用测定竹笋中丁烯氟虫腈农药残留研究[J]. 分析测试学报, 2013,32(3):372-376.
[7]	曹维强, 赵海田, 佘永新, 等. 气相色谱-质谱联用对菠菜中丁烯氟虫腈残留的检测[J]. 分析测试学报, 2009,28(9):1096-1099.
[8]	何健, 孔德洋, 吴文铸, 等. 稻田样品中丁虫腈及其代谢产物的残留分析方法[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2012,28(4):451-455.
[9]	钱国财, 魏影景, 姚庆端. 白蚁危害幼龄桉树防治试验及技术推广[J]. 林业科技通讯, 1998(7):28-29.
[10]	于建垒, 宋国春, 李瑞娟, 等. 丁虫腈在甘蓝中的残留特性及安全使用[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2011(20):79-83.
[11]	刑乐. 古香樟白蚁和樟脊网蝽虫害调查与防治[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2011.

样地号	树苗穴处理	新增泥被/cm			受害株数/株	虫株率/%	受害部位
样地号	树苗穴处理	最高	最低	平均高度	受害株数/株	虫株率/%	受害部位
1	部分盖草本	15.5	2.7	6.9	7	17.5%	根茎部、树皮
2	无覆盖	15.8	3.3	1.5	6	15.0%	根茎部、树皮
3	覆盖铁芒萁	20.6	3.2	9.2	8	20.0%	根茎部、树皮
4	无覆盖	7.6	2.7	5.2	3	7.5%	根茎部、树皮
5	部分盖草本	14.3	3.0	5.7	6	15.0%	根茎部、树皮

处理	处理前活动泥被株数/株	药剂名称	稀释倍数	防治效果/%								药效期/d
处理	处理前活动泥被株数/株	药剂名称	稀释倍数	5d	10d	20d	30d	50d	60d	70d	95d	药效期/d
处理1	12	5%丁虫腈	600	100	100	100	100	100	100	100	91.7	95
处理2	6	5%氟虫腈	1500	100	100	100	100	100	83.3	66.7	50	60
处理3	8	3%克百威		100	100	100	100	87.5	75	50	37.5	50
处理4	10	5%丁虫腈	1500	100	100	100	100	100	90	80	60	60
处理5	12	人工刮泥被		100	91.7	50	0	—	—	—	—	10

杀虫剂名称	杀虫剂成本				施工费用		综合单价/(元/株)
杀虫剂名称	规格	价格	用量	单价/元/株	工时费/(元/株)	机械使用费/(元/株)	综合单价/(元/株)
5%丁虫腈	300ml/瓶	28元/瓶	1.25ml/株	0.12	0.78	0.05	0.95
5%氟虫腈	20ml/包	2元/包	0.5ml/株	0.05	0.78	0.05	0.88
3%克百威	1000g/包	10元/包	25g/株	0.25	0.26	0.01	0.52

[1]	XING Yuanjun, WEN Kunjian, GUO Xiaoni, SONG Yabin, HU Zhongyue, JIANG Tengyu, HE Zijing. Single-Tree Crown Delineation in Plain Afforestation Areas Based on Mask R-CNN [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(3): 115-120.
[2]	YANG Junheng, CUI haijun, SHI Xunxun, GUO Ying, ZHANG Putao, BI Xiaoting. Effects of Long-Term Drainage for Afforestation on Soil Physicochemical Properties of Subtropical Sphagnum Mire in Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(1): 80-86.
[3]	ZHAO Hui, SHEN Jiaye, CHEN Xinyun, LI Liwei. Thoughts on the Path of Implementing Afforestation Space Based on Territorial Spatial Planning [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(6): 26-29.
[4]	WANG Ying. Study on the Promotion Strategy of Plain Afforestation Landscape in Daxing District from the Perspective of Landscape Architecture [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(6): 37-43.
[5]	WANG Xiaokun, WANG Yao, YU Shiyong, JIA Gang, LI Darui. Consideration on Construction of National Afforestation Monitoring System Based on Remote Sensing Technology [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2020, 0(5): 52-57.
[6]	LI Yuanhui, LU Qiuling. Strategic Thinking on Afforestation in Arid Area of China [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2020, 0(4): 1-6.
[7]	Haijun TAN. Research and Application of Triflumuron for Forest Pest Control [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2020, 0(1): 166-171.
[8]	MA Zhenhua, LI Caiwen. An Analysis on Factors Affecting the Preservation and Establishment of Plantation in Arid Areas of Northwest China [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2019, 0(4): 18-23.
[9]	WANG Yunlin. Review on China’s Plantation Development Since the Reform and Opening Up [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2019, 0(1): 6-11.
[10]	YU Lingxiao. Study on Adaptability and Planting Configuration of Main Tree Species in Beijing Plain Afforestation Project [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2019, 0(1): 153-157.
[11]	GU Wangming, ZHOU Jinxing, WU Jianhong, ZHOU Taolong, LIU Yuguo. Artificial Afforestation Technology for Rocky Desertification Control in Xichuan County of South to North Water Diversion Project [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2018, 0(3): 44-48.
[12]	LI Junwen, ZHONG Yuhong, LI Weijia, LI Quanyang. The Suggestions on the Setup of the Criminal Law System for Deforestation [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2018, 0(1): 31-37.
[13]	ZHANG Lei, HONG Guangyu, LI Zhuofan, GAO Xiaowei, HUANG Saren, WANG Zhuo, LIU Shanghua, WANG Xiaojiang. Assessment of Three Kinds of Reforestation Models Recovery Effect in Mu Us Sandy Land Based on Analytical Hierarchy Process [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2017, 0(6): 108-112.
[14]	TAN Ying, XU Jun, MAO Huaying. Vegetation Coverage Dynamic Change Analysis after Plain Afforestation—Taking Haining as an Example [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2017, 0(6): 84-88.
[15]	YANG Ming, ZHU Ye, ZHENG Xuli, WU Weiguang. The Influence of the Stability of Forestland Property Right on the Farmers’ Afforestation Investment [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2017, 0(2): 1-7.