Study on Biomass and Carbon Storage of Arbor Layers in Typical Soil and Water Conservation Forests in Taihang Mountain Range in Hebei Province

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2020.01.013

Abstract

Abstract:

Taking four typical soil and water conservation forests in Taihang Mountain area of Hebei province as research objects.Comparative study on biomass,carbon content and carbon storage of various organs in arbor layer of mixed forest(Quercus variabilis-Platycladus orientalis),Pinus tabulaeformis,Quercus variabilis forest and Robinia pseudoacacia forest.The results showed that the biomass of mixed forest,Pinus tabulaeformis,Quercus variabilis forest and Robinia pseudoacacia forest were 51.94t/hm ²,86.40t/hm ²,90.19t/hm ² and 18.08t/hm ² respectively,and the biomass of Quercus variabilis and Pinus tabulaeformis forest was higher than 4 the average biomass of soil and water conservation forests(65.65t/hm ²),the biomass of mixed forest and Robinia pseudoacacia forest only accounted for 84.25% and 29.33% of the average biomass,respectively.The order of distribution of organs in different forest stands in tree layer biomass was as follows:trunk > root > branch > leaf.The carbon content of each of the four typical stands was 45.16%~58.93%,58.48%~64.61%,51.16%~58.37%,52.35%~62.30%.The carbon storage of four typical stands is 10.10~53.85t/hm ².The carbon storage of each organ of different forest types was positively proportional to the biomass,which was basically the same as the biomass trend.The carbon storage size was as follows:Pinus tabulaeformis > Quercus variabilis forest > Mixed forest > Robinia pseudoacacia.

Key words: soil and water conservation forest, biomass, carbon content, carbon storage

CLC Number:

S718.5

Zhiming TANG, Bingxiang LIU, Yu QU. Study on Biomass and Carbon Storage of Arbor Layers in Typical Soil and Water Conservation Forests in Taihang Mountain Range in Hebei Province[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2020, (1): 102-107.

Figures/Tables 6

Tab.1

Tab.2

Tab.3

Tab.4

Tab.5

Fig.1

References 28

[1]	李海奎, 雷渊才 . 中国森林植被生物量和碳储量评估[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2010.
[2]	Piao Shilong, Fang Jingyun, Ciais P , et al. The carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China[J]. Nature, 2010,458(7241):1009-1013. doi: 10.1038/nature07944 pmid: 19396142
[3]	侯芳, 王克勤, 宋娅丽 , 等. 滇中亚高山5种典型森林乔木层生物量及碳储量分配格局[J]. 水土保持研究, 2018,25(6):29-35.
[4]	姜慧泉, 张会儒, 亢新刚 . 长白山阔叶次生林主要乔木地上碳储量分布[J]. 林业资源管理, 2009(5):58-63.
[5]	李路, 常亚鹏, 许仲林 . 乌鲁木齐南山森林生物量和碳储量空间分布特征[J]. 水土保持研究, 2018,25(5):72-77.
[6]	Zhou Guangsheng, Wang Yuhui, Jiang Yanling , et al. Estimating biomass and net primary production from forest inventory data:A case study of China's Larix forest[J]. Forest Ecology & Managrment, 2002,169(1):149-157.
[7]	Brown S L, Schroeder P E . Spatial patterns of aboveground production and mortality of woody biomass for eastern U.S.forest[J]. Ecological Applications, 1999,9(3):968-980.
[8]	Peng Shouzhang, Zhao Chuanyan, Peng Huanhua , et al. Spatial distribution of Tamarix ramosissima aboveground biomass and water consumption in the lower reaches of Heihe River,Northwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010,21(8):1940-1946.
[9]	张志明, 常帅, 张亚珍 . 不同类型油松林生物量碳密度的研究[J]. 山西林业科技, 2012,41(3):11-14.
[10]	Fournier R A, Luther J E, Guindon L , et al. Mapping aboveground tree biomass at the stand level from inventory information:test cases in Newfoundland and Quebec[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2003,33(10):1864-1863. doi: 10.1139/x03-111
[11]	Ammer C, Wagner S . Problems and options inmodeling fine rootbiomass singlemature Norway spruce trees at giver points from stand data[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2002,32(3):581-590. doi: 10.1139/x01-229
[12]	刘广营, 赵国华, 王广海 , 等. 华北落叶松人工林生物量分配格局[J]. 河北林果研究, 2011,26(3):222-226.
[13]	武会欣, 史月桂, 张宏芝 , 等. 八达岭林场油松林生物量的研究[J]. 河北林果研究, 2006,21(3):240-242.
[14]	毕君, 黄则舟, 王振亮 . 刺槐单株生物量动态研究[J]. 河北林学院学报, 1993,8(4):278-282.
[15]	陈灵芝, 陈清规, 鲍显魄 , 等. 北京山区的侧柏林及其生物量研究[J]. 植物生态学与地植物学丛刊, 1986,10(1):17-25.
[16]	刘玉翠, 吴明作, 郭宗民 , 等. 宝天曼自然保护区栓皮栎林生物量和净生产力研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 1998,9(6):569-574.
[17]	鲍士旦 . 土壤农化分析:3版[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1999.
[18]	伊锋, 韩有志, 贺自书 , 等. 山西太岳山森林生物量与碳密度研究[J]. 山西农业科学, 2017,45(4):599-602.
[19]	王宁, 富丰珍, 程浩天 , 等. 大庆市城市森林公园乔木林生物量及碳储量估算[J]. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报, 2019,31(3):9-14.
[20]	王炳焱 . 伏牛山北坡栓皮栎天然次生林不同生长阶段生物量和碳储量研究[D]. 郑州:河南农业大学, 2015.
[21]	朱丽平 . 北京五种人工林生态系统生物量和碳密度研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2016.
[22]	宋娅丽, 韩海荣, 康峰峰 . 山西太岳山不同林龄油松林生物量及碳储量研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2016,23(1):29-33.
[23]	付梦瑶, 杨红震, 杨喜田 . 不同立地条件下栓皮栎人工林群落生物量结构特征[J]. 林业资源管理, 2016(3):67-73.
[24]	胡海清, 罗碧珍, 魏书精 . 大兴安岭5种典型林型森林生物碳储量[J]. 生态学报, 2015,35(17):5745-5760. doi: 10.5846/stxb201312293051
[25]	程丽芬 . 山西霍山森林群落生物量与碳密度研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2017(1):70-74.
[26]	贾松伟, 郭蔓蔓 . 2013年河南省乔木林植被碳储量特征[J]. 水土保持研究, 2019,26(3):29-34.
[27]	曹晓阳 . 山西中南部主要造林树种固碳能力研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2013.
[28]	杨红震 . 河南伏牛山区栎类天然次生林群落结构与生物量、碳储量研究[D]. 郑州:河南农业大学, 2016.

林分类型	海拔/m	坡度/(°)	坡向	坡位	平均胸径/ cm	平均树高/ m	郁闭度(盖度)/ %
混交林	848	33	半阳坡	中坡	13.3	7.2	0.86
油松林	798	38	半阳坡	中坡	14.5	10.9	0.78
栓皮栎林	691	32	半阳坡	中坡	16.9	15.6	0.88
刺槐林	649	27	半阳坡	中坡	10.2	5.6	0.85

树种	相对方程
油松^[13]	LnW_干=0.7639+0.4384ln(D²H)
	LnW_枝=0.2484+0.3369ln(D²H)
	LnW_叶=-0.0420+0.3240ln(D²H)
	LnW_根=0.5399+0.3106ln(D²H)
刺槐^[14]	LnW_干=-2.895531+0.86764ln(D²H)
	LnW_枝=-3.71916+0.79079ln(D²H)
	LnW_叶=-2.90872+0.45739ln(D²H)
	LnW_根=-2.16746+0.63276ln(D²H)
侧柏^[15]	W_干=125.310(D²H)⁰^.⁷³³
	W_枝=137.403+12.887(D²H)
	W_叶=53.490+9.97(D²H)
	W_根=11.007(D²H)-160.386
栓皮栎^[16]	lgW_干=-0.544023+0.679572lg(D²H)
	lgW_枝=-5.60986+1.109206lg(D²H)
	lgW_叶=-2.003840+0.746017lg(D²H)
	lgW_根=-0.264502+0.517306lg(D²H)
	lgW_皮=-0.824562+0.589619lg(D²H)

林分类型	器官	树干		枝	叶	根	总计
林分类型	器官	干	皮	枝	叶	根	总计
混交林	生物量/(t/hm²)	23.14	6.33	6.94	2.56	12.97	51.94
混交林	分配率/%	44.55	12.18	13.36	4.92	24.99	100.00
油松林	生物量/(t/hm²)	49.08	—	13.46	9.10	14.76	86.40
油松林	分配率/%	56.80	—	15.57	10.53	17.10	100.00
栓皮栎林	生物量/(t/hm²)	41.07	9.93	17.11	2.53	19.55	90.19
栓皮栎林	分配率/%	45.53	11.01	18.97	2.81	21.68	100.00
刺槐林	生物量/(t/hm²)	10.18	—	2.69	0.73	4.48	18.08
刺槐林	分配率/%	56.30	—	14.87	4.03	24.80	100.00

林分类型	树干		枝	叶	根
林分类型	干	皮	枝	叶	根
混交林	58.93±1.66aB	—	51.44±1.80cB	55.57±0.81bA	45.16±2.21dC
油松林	62.79±1.90aA	—	64.61±2.16aA	62.59±1.75aA	58.48±1.11aA
栓皮栎林	56.92±1.34aB	52.49±1.47aA	58.37±1.59aA	56.59±1.56aA	51.16±0.39bB
刺槐林	55.77±0.74bB	—	62.30±1.63aB	53.95±0.96bA	52.35±0.72bB

林分类型	器官	树干		枝	叶	根	总计
林分类型	器官	干	皮	枝	叶	根	总计
混交林	碳储量/(t/hm²)	13.23	2.82	4.00	1.50	6.55	28.10
混交林	分配率/%	47.08	10.04	14.23	5.34	23.31	100.00
油松林	碳储量/(t/hm²)	30.82	—	8.70	5.70	8.63	53.85
油松林	分配率/%	57.23	—	16.16	10.58	16.03	100.00
栓皮栎林	碳储量/(t/hm²)	23.38	5.21	9.99	1.43	10.00	50.01
栓皮栎林	分配率/%	46.75	10.42	19.98	2.86	19.99	100.00
刺槐林	碳储量/(t/hm²)	5.68	—	1.68	0.39	2.35	10.10
刺槐林	分配率/%	56.24	—	16.63	3.86	23.27	100.00