FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT ›› 2022›› Issue (5): 136-144.doi: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2022.05.017
• Technical Application • Previous Articles Next Articles
HAO Min1,2(), TANG Hui2,3(
), WANG Manlian2,3, LIU Baoyu2,3, CHEN Yujiao1,2
Received:
2022-08-29
Revised:
2022-10-21
Online:
2022-10-28
Published:
2022-12-23
Contact:
TANG Hui
E-mail:757955523@qq.com;913529761@qq.com
CLC Number:
HAO Min, TANG Hui, WANG Manlian, LIU Baoyu, CHEN Yujiao. Evaluation and Screening of Ornamental Illicium difengpi Germplasm in Terms of Leaf Morphology Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Method[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, (5): 136-144.
Tab.1
Appraisal standard for target hierarchy of ornamental Illicium difengpi
约束层 | 标准层 | 评分标准与分值 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | ||
植株生长量B1 | 冠幅(C1)/cm | >29.99 | 29.99~25.99 | 25.99~21.99 | 21.99~18.99 | ≤18.99 |
植株高度(C2)/cm | >33.5 | 33.5~30.5 | 30.5~24.5 | 24.5~18.0 | ≤18.0 | |
轮数(C3) | >7 | 7~6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | |
地径(C4)/mm | >7.99 | 7.99~6.99 | 6.99~5.99 | 5.99~4.99 | ≤4.99 | |
叶片生长量B2 | 叶片数(C5)/枚 | >23 | 23~19 | 19~14 | 14~10 | ≤10 |
叶片大小(长宽比)(C6) | >3.49 | 3.49~2.99 | 2.99~2.74 | 2.74~2.49 | ≤2.49 | |
叶柄长(C7)/mm | >19.99 | 19.99~17.99 | 17.99~15.99 | 15.99~13.99 | ≤13.99 | |
嫩叶数(C8)/枚 | >9 | 9~6 | 6~4 | 4 | 3 | |
叶片观赏性B3 | 叶繁密度(C9) | 高 | 较高 | 一般 | 较低 | 低 |
叶片颜色(C10) | 嫩绿色 | 绿色 | 深绿色 | |||
叶形(C11) | 倒披针形、先端短尖、叶宽 | 倒披针形、先端短尖不明显、叶宽 | 倒披针形、先端短尖、叶窄 | 长椭圆形、先端近圆形、叶宽 | 长椭圆形、先端近圆形、叶窄 | |
叶片光泽度(C12) | 平滑光亮 | 无明显光泽 | 表面暗沉 | |||
叶片厚度(C13)/mm | >0.79 | 0.79~0.69 | 0.69~0.59 | 0.59~0.50 | ≤0.50 | |
叶片舒展度(C14) | 叶片全部展开 | 叶片部分展开 | 叶片大部分向上卷曲 | |||
嫩叶颜色(C15) | 深红色或红色 | 红叶中略带黄色 | 黄叶中略带红色 | 黄色 | 绿色 |
Tab.2
Evaluation index weights and consistency of judgment matrices for ornamental Illicium difengpi
层次模型 | 指标 | 判断矩阵 | 约束层权重 ( | 标准层权重 ( | 一致性检验 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A-Bi | Bi | B1 | B2 | B3 | CR=0.0288<0.1 | ||||||
植株生长量(B1) | 1.0000 | 0.6759 | 0.1959 | 0.1214 | |||||||
叶片生长量(B2) | 1.4795 | 1.0000 | 0.1680 | 0.1498 | |||||||
叶片观赏性(B3) | 5.1046 | 5.9524 | 1.0000 | 0.7289 | |||||||
B1-Ci | B1-Ci | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | CR=0.0498<0.1 | |||||
冠幅(C1) | 1.0000 | 0.4273 | 0.7136 | 0.3050 | 0.1198 | ||||||
植株高度(C2) | 2.3403 | 1.0000 | 3.5441 | 1.6306 | 0.4016 | ||||||
轮数(C3) | 1.4013 | 0.2822 | 1.0000 | 0.2302 | 0.1183 | ||||||
地径(C4) | 3.2787 | 0.6133 | 4.3440 | 1.0000 | 0.3603 | ||||||
B2-Ci | B2-Ci | C5 | C6 | C7 | C8 | CR=0.0514<0.1 | |||||
叶片数(C5) | 1.0000 | 0.7805 | 2.3905 | 0.2895 | 0.1837 | ||||||
叶片大小(C6) | 1.2812 | 1.0000 | 4.6514 | 1.3098 | 0.3499 | ||||||
叶柄长(C7) | 0.4183 | 0.2150 | 1.0000 | 0.2091 | 0.0746 | ||||||
嫩叶数(C8) | 3.4542 | 0.7635 | 4.7824 | 1.0000 | 0.3918 | ||||||
B3-Ci | B3-Ci | C9 | C10 | C11 | C12 | C13 | C14 | C15 | CR=0.0203<0.1 | ||
叶繁密度(C9) | 1.0000 | 2.0070 | 0.8296 | 0.6396 | 2.2766 | 1.9697 | 0.1437 | 0.1032 | |||
叶片颜色(C10) | 0.4983 | 1.0000 | 0.3905 | 0.3389 | 1.1925 | 1.1543 | 0.1580 | 0.0580 | |||
叶形(C11) | 1.2054 | 2.5608 | 1.0000 | 1.9241 | 4.6706 | 3.9649 | 0.5026 | 0.1918 | |||
叶片光泽度(C12) | 1.5635 | 2.9507 | 0.5197 | 1.0000 | 3.8198 | 3.0458 | 0.2964 | 0.1441 | |||
叶片厚度(C13) | 0.4393 | 0.8386 | 0.2141 | 0.2618 | 1.0000 | 0.6386 | 0.1492 | 0.0437 | |||
叶片舒展度(C14) | 0.5077 | 0.8663 | 0.2522 | 0.3283 | 1.5659 | 1.0000 | 0.1686 | 0.0549 | |||
嫩叶颜色(C15) | 6.9589 | 6.3291 | 1.9897 | 3.3738 | 6.7024 | 5.9312 | 1.0000 | 0.4043 |
Tab.3
Comprehensive evaluation and ranking of ornamental Illicium difengpi germplasm
编号 | 总分 (Sj) | 等级 | 编号 | 总分 (Sj) | 等级 | 编号 | 总分 (Sj) | 等级 | 编号 | 总分 (Sj) | 等级 | 编号 | 总分 (Sj) | 等级 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
219 | 3.9442 | Ⅰ | 52 | 3.4176 | Ⅱ | 216 | 3.1416 | Ⅲ | 76 | 2.9470 | Ⅳ | 149 | 2.6608 | Ⅳ |
7 | 3.8658 | Ⅰ | 114 | 3.4114 | Ⅱ | 199 | 3.1364 | Ⅲ | 144 | 2.9442 | Ⅳ | 180 | 2.6490 | Ⅳ |
107 | 3.8252 | Ⅰ | 33 | 3.4068 | Ⅱ | 43 | 3.1290 | Ⅲ | 148 | 2.9336 | Ⅳ | 125 | 2.6414 | Ⅳ |
184 | 3.8150 | Ⅰ | 35 | 3.4048 | Ⅱ | 63 | 3.1254 | Ⅲ | 129 | 2.9296 | Ⅳ | 136 | 2.6248 | Ⅳ |
45 | 3.8052 | Ⅰ | 225 | 3.3992 | Ⅱ | 191 | 3.1236 | Ⅲ | 84 | 2.9178 | Ⅳ | 61 | 2.6138 | Ⅳ |
13 | 3.8024 | Ⅰ | 116 | 3.3980 | Ⅱ | 34 | 3.1202 | Ⅲ | 49 | 2.9142 | Ⅳ | 195 | 2.6128 | Ⅳ |
1 | 3.7346 | Ⅰ | 10 | 3.3890 | Ⅱ | 26 | 3.1170 | Ⅲ | 29 | 2.9098 | Ⅳ | 32 | 2.5774 | Ⅳ |
103 | 3.7278 | Ⅰ | 209 | 3.3886 | Ⅱ | 134 | 3.1168 | Ⅲ | 30 | 2.9002 | Ⅳ | 133 | 2.5750 | Ⅳ |
28 | 3.6996 | Ⅰ | 58 | 3.3860 | Ⅱ | 108 | 3.1160 | Ⅲ | 86 | 2.8950 | Ⅳ | 179 | 2.5740 | Ⅳ |
27 | 3.6950 | Ⅰ | 123 | 3.3844 | Ⅱ | 167 | 3.1134 | Ⅲ | 12 | 2.8930 | Ⅳ | 170 | 2.5722 | Ⅳ |
118 | 3.6808 | Ⅰ | 88 | 3.3770 | Ⅱ | 164 | 3.1124 | Ⅲ | 121 | 2.8892 | Ⅳ | 82 | 2.5666 | Ⅳ |
203 | 3.6768 | Ⅰ | 131 | 3.3720 | Ⅱ | 185 | 3.1110 | Ⅲ | 69 | 2.8832 | Ⅳ | 98 | 2.5532 | Ⅳ |
183 | 3.6766 | Ⅰ | 220 | 3.3716 | Ⅱ | 73 | 3.1072 | Ⅲ | 146 | 2.8704 | Ⅳ | 41 | 2.5510 | Ⅳ |
140 | 3.6680 | Ⅰ | 8 | 3.3640 | Ⅱ | 39 | 3.1032 | Ⅲ | 221 | 2.8512 | Ⅳ | 210 | 2.5282 | Ⅳ |
94 | 3.6586 | Ⅰ | 75 | 3.3624 | Ⅱ | 214 | 3.1030 | Ⅲ | 162 | 2.8510 | Ⅳ | 159 | 2.5214 | Ⅳ |
200 | 3.6500 | Ⅰ | 48 | 3.3208 | Ⅱ | 64 | 3.0994 | Ⅲ | 67 | 2.8496 | Ⅳ | 178 | 2.5140 | Ⅳ |
95 | 3.6380 | Ⅰ | 5 | 3.3064 | Ⅱ | 212 | 3.0954 | Ⅲ | 155 | 2.8464 | Ⅳ | 85 | 2.5074 | Ⅳ |
194 | 3.6356 | Ⅰ | 168 | 3.3040 | Ⅱ | 72 | 3.0884 | Ⅲ | 207 | 2.8384 | Ⅳ | 150 | 2.5032 | Ⅳ |
182 | 3.6248 | Ⅰ | 18 | 3.3012 | Ⅱ | 135 | 3.0878 | Ⅲ | 157 | 2.8376 | Ⅳ | 17 | 2.4890 | Ⅴ |
11 | 3.6064 | Ⅰ | 65 | 3.2960 | Ⅲ | 208 | 3.0750 | Ⅲ | 166 | 2.8338 | Ⅳ | 154 | 2.4776 | Ⅴ |
141 | 3.5964 | Ⅱ | 193 | 3.2878 | Ⅲ | 110 | 3.0734 | Ⅲ | 202 | 2.8314 | Ⅳ | 31 | 2.4720 | Ⅴ |
66 | 3.5884 | Ⅱ | 218 | 3.2848 | Ⅲ | 42 | 3.0706 | Ⅲ | 120 | 2.8222 | Ⅳ | 169 | 2.4658 | Ⅴ |
177 | 3.5846 | Ⅱ | 151 | 3.2814 | Ⅲ | 92 | 3.0648 | Ⅲ | 70 | 2.8080 | Ⅳ | 97 | 2.4650 | Ⅴ |
9 | 3.5786 | Ⅱ | 215 | 3.2806 | Ⅲ | 91 | 3.0640 | Ⅲ | 201 | 2.8074 | Ⅳ | 68 | 2.4342 | Ⅴ |
113 | 3.5684 | Ⅱ | 40 | 3.2764 | Ⅲ | 132 | 3.0636 | Ⅲ | 122 | 2.7976 | Ⅳ | 3 | 2.4228 | Ⅴ |
51 | 3.5652 | Ⅱ | 81 | 3.2700 | Ⅲ | 205 | 3.0570 | Ⅲ | 158 | 2.7972 | Ⅳ | 152 | 2.4212 | Ⅴ |
109 | 3.5508 | Ⅱ | 115 | 3.2672 | Ⅲ | 77 | 3.0536 | Ⅲ | 171 | 2.7862 | Ⅳ | 79 | 2.3988 | Ⅴ |
175 | 3.5490 | Ⅱ | 71 | 3.2604 | Ⅲ | 174 | 3.0486 | Ⅲ | 126 | 2.7726 | Ⅳ | 145 | 2.3916 | Ⅴ |
57 | 3.5484 | Ⅱ | 53 | 3.2426 | Ⅲ | 224 | 3.0438 | Ⅲ | 87 | 2.7654 | Ⅳ | 22 | 2.3876 | Ⅴ |
163 | 3.5276 | Ⅱ | 44 | 3.2424 | Ⅲ | 204 | 3.0356 | Ⅲ | 196 | 2.7644 | Ⅳ | 47 | 2.3850 | Ⅴ |
213 | 3.5004 | Ⅱ | 198 | 3.2376 | Ⅲ | 78 | 3.0338 | Ⅲ | 192 | 2.7514 | Ⅳ | 23 | 2.3758 | Ⅴ |
111 | 3.4970 | Ⅱ | 176 | 3.2324 | Ⅲ | 173 | 3.0212 | Ⅲ | 223 | 2.7506 | Ⅳ | 161 | 2.3342 | Ⅴ |
25 | 3.4848 | Ⅱ | 62 | 3.2212 | Ⅲ | 19 | 3.0148 | Ⅲ | 217 | 2.7494 | Ⅳ | 139 | 2.3118 | Ⅴ |
128 | 3.4828 | Ⅱ | 37 | 3.2188 | Ⅲ | 2 | 3.0134 | Ⅲ | 100 | 2.7388 | Ⅳ | 138 | 2.2914 | Ⅴ |
186 | 3.4728 | Ⅱ | 137 | 3.2128 | Ⅲ | 187 | 3.0092 | Ⅲ | 36 | 2.7328 | Ⅳ | 21 | 2.2652 | Ⅴ |
55 | 3.4620 | Ⅱ | 20 | 3.2108 | Ⅲ | 24 | 3.0058 | Ⅲ | 197 | 2.7210 | Ⅳ | 190 | 2.2460 | Ⅴ |
188 | 3.4564 | Ⅱ | 147 | 3.2106 | Ⅲ | 50 | 3.0054 | Ⅲ | 211 | 2.7210 | Ⅳ | 104 | 2.2454 | Ⅴ |
4 | 3.4558 | Ⅱ | 127 | 3.2080 | Ⅲ | 74 | 3.0046 | Ⅲ | 105 | 2.7168 | Ⅳ | 102 | 2.2148 | Ⅴ |
14 | 3.4544 | Ⅱ | 46 | 3.1920 | Ⅲ | 15 | 2.9906 | Ⅳ | 83 | 2.7148 | Ⅳ | 59 | 2.1790 | Ⅴ |
165 | 3.4538 | Ⅱ | 16 | 3.1782 | Ⅲ | 106 | 2.9852 | Ⅳ | 89 | 2.6944 | Ⅳ | 189 | 2.1752 | Ⅴ |
80 | 3.4524 | Ⅱ | 172 | 3.1768 | Ⅲ | 181 | 2.9840 | Ⅳ | 124 | 2.6936 | Ⅳ | 38 | 2.1400 | Ⅴ |
226 | 3.4462 | Ⅱ | 90 | 3.1692 | Ⅲ | 222 | 2.9800 | Ⅳ | 54 | 2.6892 | Ⅳ | 99 | 2.0038 | Ⅴ |
156 | 3.4280 | Ⅱ | 56 | 3.1604 | Ⅲ | 142 | 2.9716 | Ⅳ | 112 | 2.6742 | Ⅳ | 160 | 1.9820 | Ⅴ |
153 | 3.4270 | Ⅱ | 130 | 3.1574 | Ⅲ | 60 | 2.9630 | Ⅳ | 96 | 2.6684 | Ⅳ | 206 | 1.8576 | Ⅴ |
93 | 3.4212 | Ⅱ | 6 | 3.1494 | Ⅲ | 143 | 2.9506 | Ⅳ | 119 | 2.6612 | Ⅳ | 117 | 1.7546 | Ⅴ |
101 | 1.7028 | Ⅴ |
[1] | 孙嘉惠, 刘冰, 郭兰萍, 等. 植物分类学于中药资源学的意义:《中国药典》植物药材基源物种科属范畴变动考证及学名规范化研究[J]. 中国科学:生命科学, 2021, 51(5):579-593. |
[2] | 余兴光, 孙卫邦, 杨静. 云南省极小种群野生植物研究与保护[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019. |
[3] | 唐辉, 史艳财, 孔德鑫, 等. 岩溶特有植物地枫皮的种质资源调查及地理分布[J]. 广东农业科学, 2011, 38(12):113-117. |
[4] | 孔德鑫, 李雁群, 梁惠凌, 等. 地枫皮营养器官解剖结构特征及其叶片结构的生态适应性[J]. 基因组学与应用生物学, 2012, 31(3):282-288. |
[5] | 霍丽妮, 李培源, 邓超澄, 等. 广西地枫皮不同部位挥发油化学成分比较[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2010, 16(16):81-84. |
[6] | 唐辉, 孔德鑫, 梁惠凌, 等. 不同产地地枫皮的红外光谱和化学计量学快速评价[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2012, 34(3):137-141. |
[7] | 刘元, 韦焕英, 姚树汉, 等. 地枫皮类药理作用研究[J]. 湖南中医药导报, 1997(Z1):72-75. |
[8] | 王满莲, 唐辉, 韩愈, 等. 水分胁迫与复水对地枫皮生理生态特性的影响[J]. 广西植物, 2017, 37(6):716-722. |
[9] | 王满莲, 孔德鑫, 邹蓉, 等. 不同土壤环境对地枫皮幼苗生长和生物量分配的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2013(3):67-71. |
[10] | 王满莲, 孔德鑫, 邹容, 等. PEG模拟水分胁迫对地枫皮和八角种子萌发的影响[J]. 种子, 2013, 32(8):75-78. |
[11] | 唐辉, 王满莲, 韦记青, 等. 林下与全光下地枫皮叶片形态和光合特性的比较[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 2010, 46(9):949-952. |
[12] | 廖美兰, 林茂, 周修任, 等. AHP法对42种苦苣苔科植物观赏性状综合评价[J]. 农业研究与应用, 2018, 31(1):9-15. |
[13] | 温放. 广西苦苣苔科观赏植物资源调查与引种研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2008. |
[14] | 宁惠娟, 邵锋, 孙茜茜, 等. 基于AHP法的杭州花港观鱼公园植物景观评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2011, 23(4):717-724. |
[15] | 涂燕茹. 基于地方特色景观营造的贵州乡土木本植物区划与筛选[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2020. |
[16] | 周亚福, 李思锋, 黎斌, 等. 基于层次分析法的秦岭重要药用植物资源评价研究[J]. 中草药, 2013, 44(15):2172-2182. |
[17] | 温放, 张启翔, 王越. 广西唇柱苣苔属和小花苣苔属植物的观赏性状评价与筛选[J]. 园艺学报, 2008(2):239-250. |
[18] | 刘豹, 许树柏, 赵焕臣, 等. 层次分析法——规划决策的工具[J]. 系统工程, 1984(2):23-30. |
[19] | 陈和明, 朱根发, 操君喜, 等. 蝴蝶兰27个品种观赏性状评价[J]. 热带作物学报, 2013, 34(6):1060-1064. |
[1] | ZHOU Long, YANG Xiaoxue, DUAN Xiaochen. Comprehensive Adaptability Evaluation of Six Kinds of Landscapeing Plants in Semi-arid Region [J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2024, 0(1): 73-81. |
[2] | DU Jun, CAO Jiashuo, LI Weidie. Survey and Evaluation of Wildlife Resources in Heilongjiang Huzhong National Nature Reserve [J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2023, 0(6): 82-90. |
[3] | JIANG Yafang, TIAN Jing, LIU Zengli, MA Wei, SHAO Wei, BAI Ling. The Resource Status and Conservation Strategies of National Key Protected Wild Plants in China [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(4): 1-10. |
[4] | TAN Ying, XU Jun, LIN Congcong, WANG Ke, WANG Wenwu, CHEN Chunlei. Study on the Comprehensive Value Evaluation of Ancient and Famous Tree Resources in Zhejiang Province Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(4): 169-178. |
[5] | LUO Dan, WANG Qingfei, CHAO Bixiao, LI Le, HAO Zezhou, LU Yuan, WANG Cheng, WU Ruichen, LIU Feipeng, PEI Nancai. Evaluation on Fire Risk Rating of Forest Stands in Wildland-Urban Interface—A Case Study of Guangzhou City [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(3): 56-64. |
[6] | YANG Xiao, HU Jiping, REN Kailei, RUAN Xiangdong. Evaluation and Optimization of Survey Methods for Ecological Factors about Wild Animals and Their Habitats [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(3): 65-70. |
[7] | JIANG Xuwang, YU Shuhan, LI Yihui, ZHAN Liyu. Research on Evaluation of Elderly Healing Forest Wellness Base [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(3): 71-79. |
[8] | WANG Lin, GAO Jinping, TIAN Haijing, WU Qiang, SHI Junhua, ZHOU Xin, FAN Yunbao, XIE Jingjie. Practice and Discussion on the Construction of "One Map" Intelligent Management Platform for Grassland Resources Management —Take the Intelligent Grassland Management Platform of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps as an Example [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(2): 27-35. |
[9] | QIU Jie, LI Qiannan, YU Yao. Research on Estimating Forest Stock Volume via Airborne LiDAR Data [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(1): 153-160. |
[10] | XU Ganjun, WANG Yaping, LI Xinyang, GUO Nan, YANG Mei, HE Dan. Exploring the Landscape Diversity of Graded Road Green Spaces Based on UAV Aerial Survey [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(1): 161-172. |
[11] | YANG Xueqing, SUN Zhichao, CHAI Zheng, QIU Yiwen, JIANG Chunying. Research on the Plot Survey and Load Estimation of National Forest Fuels [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(6): 1-6. |
[12] | NIE Jing, LU Chi, OU Guanglong, XU Hui. Two-Stage Sampling Estimation of Above-Ground Biomass of Pinus kesiya var.langbianensis Based on Remote Sensing Factors from Landsat8 OLI [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(6): 68-75. |
[13] | LIU Lijie, XIE Zhuohong, LEI Ming, SHI Yuemou, LI Shengqiang, LIU Ping. Evaluation of Forest Quality Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process —A Case Study in Liuxihe Forest Farm,Guangzhou [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(6): 89-94. |
[14] | YANG Xueqing, SUN Zhichao, WANG Lisheng, CHAI Zheng, QIU Yiwen, JIANG Chunying. Study of Sampling Survey Method for Forest Fuels Based on Large Plots [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(5): 53-59. |
[15] | HU Jiayi, WANG Ruihui, LIU Kaili, ZHANG Bin, ZHOU Yuhuai, LI Xuehui, GONG Yingyun. Effects of Thinning on Ecological Benefits of Cryptomeria fortunei Plantations in High Altitude Area of Western Sichuan [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(4): 80-88. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 70
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 219
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||