Comparative Analysis on the Community Characteristics of Pinus taeda and Larix kaempferi in Typical Mountainous Region of Shandong Province

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2016.01.015

FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT ›› 2016›› Issue (1): 84-89.doi: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2016.01.015

• Scientific Research • Previous Articles Next Articles

Comparative Analysis on the Community Characteristics of Pinus taeda and Larix kaempferi in Typical Mountainous Region of Shandong Province

GAO Yuan^1,2, ZHANG Kuiyuan³, LIU Jian⁴, ZHAO Weiguang⁴

1. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Water and Soil Conservation and Environmental Protection,Institute of Water and Soil Conservation and Environmental Protection,College of Resources and Environment,Linyi University,Linyi 276005,Shandong,China;
2. Linyi Scientific Exploration Laboratory,Linyi 276037,Shandong,China;
3. Linyi Linguang No.1 Middle School,Linyi 276624,Shandong,China;
4. College of Life Science,Qufu Normal University,Qufu 273165,Shandong,China

Received:2015-10-19 Revised:2015-11-10 Published:2020-11-04

Abstract

Abstract: Eleven sample plots from major mountain areas,such as Taishan,Mengshan,and Kunyushan,were selected in Shandong Province to evaluate the growth and renewal of the communities of Pinus taeda and Larix kaempferi.The following three aspects were investigated to determine the adaptability of P.taeda and L.kaempferi in Shandong Province:the population characteristics,the community composition,and the species diversity.The results showed that the species numbers of trees,shrubs,and herbs were 15 species,29 species,and 27 species in the P.taeda community and 26 species,49 species,and 49 species in the L.kaempferi community,respectively.The plant densities of trees,shrubs,and herbs for the P.taeda community were(15.38±1.84)/dam²,(51.50±13.00)/dam²,(14.38±3.80)/m²,and for the L.kaempferi community were(10.55±0.97)/dam²,(37.07±7.99)/dam²,(25.45±11.35)/m².In the P.taeda community,the population of the P.taeda was the stable type,the Quercus variabilis was the significant growth type,the Q.acutissima and the P.densiflora were the growth type.In the L.kaempferi community,the population of the L.kaempferi,Sorbus pohuashanensis,Tilia tuan were the stable type,and the Q.variabilis was the significant growth type.The richness indexes and Shannon-Wiener diversity indexes of the P.taeda community were shrub>herb>tree,Simpson diversity indexes and Pielou evenness indexs were herb>shrub>tree.The richness indexes of the L.kaempferi community was shrub>herb>tree,Shannon-Wiener diversity indexes and Simpson diversity indexes were shrub>tree>herb,Pielou evenness indexs was herb>shrub>tree.The succession tendency of the P.taeda community was P.taeda forest→theropencedrymion→Q.variabilis forest or Q.acutissima forest,and the L.kaempferi community was L.kaempferi forest→theropencedrymion→Q.variabilis forest or mixed forest.

Key words: plant ecology, Pinus taeda, Larix kaempferi, Taishan Mountain, Mengshan Mountain, Kunyushan Mountain

CLC Number:

Q948

GAO Yuan, ZHANG Kuiyuan, LIU Jian, ZHAO Weiguang. Comparative Analysis on the Community Characteristics of Pinus taeda and Larix kaempferi in Typical Mountainous Region of Shandong Province[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2016, (1): 84-89.

References

[1] 孙晓梅,张守攻,祁万宜,等.北亚热带高山区日本落叶松造林整地与抚育技术的研究[J].林业科学研究,2007,20(2):235-240.
[2] 朱红燕,王得祥,柴宗政,等.秦岭西段日本落叶松人工林生长规律研究[J].西北林学院学报,2015,30(1):1-7.
[3] 孙英杰,赵爱芬.昆嵛山杉木和火炬松种群的自然更新与群落特征[J].鲁东大学学报:自然科学版,2010,26(1):29-34.
[4] 马少杰,付伟章,李正才,等.泰山南北坡植物物种多样性垂直梯度格局的比较[J].生态科学,2010,29(4):367-374.
[5] 高远,朱孔山,郝加琛,等.山东蒙山 6 种造林树种 40 余年成林效果评价[J].植物生态学报,2013,37(8):728-738.
[6] 杜宁,王琦,郭卫华,等.昆嵛山典型植物群落生态学特征[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(2):151-158.
[7] 方精云,沈泽昊,唐志尧,等.“中国山地植物物种多样性调查计划”及若干技术规范[J].生物多样性,2004,12(1):5-9.
[8] 方精云,王襄平,沈泽昊,等.植物群落清查的主要内容、方法和技术规范[J].生物多样性,2009,17(6):533-548.
[9] 万慧霖,冯宗炜.庐山常绿阔叶林物种组成及其演替趋势[J].生态学报,2008,28(3):1147-1156.
[10] 李立,陈建华,任海保,等.古田山常绿阔叶林优势树种甜槠和木荷的空间格局分析[J].植物生态学报,2010,34(3):241-252.
[11] Tom L,Christina A C.Measuring diversity:the importance of species similarity[J].Ecology,2012,93(3):477-489.
[12] 祝遵凌,火艳,李燕楠.八种木本植物分布区预测及适生性分析与景观应用研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2015,35(6):1-6.
[13] Uriarte M,Swenson N G,Chazdon R L,et al.Trait similarity,shared ancestry and the structure of neighborhood interactions in a subtropical wet forest:implications for community assembly[J].Ecol.Lett.,2010,13:1503-1514.
[14] 王芸芸,师帅,蔺菲,等.长白山阔叶红松林木本植物繁殖特征及其关联性[J].科学通报,2014,59(24):2407-2415.
[15] Kanowski J,Catterall C P,Wardell-Johnson GW,et al.Development of forest structure on cleared rainforest land in eastern Australia under different styles of reforestation[J].Forest Ecol.Manag.,2003,183:265-280.
[16] 刘海丰,薛达元,桑卫国.暖温带森林功能发育过程中的物种扩散和生态位分化[J].科学通报,2014,59(24):2359-2366.
[17] 张殷波,张峰.翅果油树群落结构多样性[J].生态学杂志,2012,31(8):1936-1941.
[18] 程红梅,田锴,田兴军.大蜀山孤岛状山体植被演替阶段物种多样性变化规律[J].生态学杂志,2015,34(7):1830-1837.
[19] 高远,孟凡旭,朱孔山,等.山东孔林主要植物种群和群落特征研究[J].林业资源管理,2015(3):70-77.
[20] 高远,慈海鑫,邱振鲁,等.山东蒙山植物多样性及其海拔梯度格局[J].生态学报,2009,29(12):6377-6384.
[21] 高远,陈玉峰,董恒,等.50 年来山东塔山植被与物种多样性的变化[J].生态学报,2011,31(20):5984-5991.
[22] Guariguata M R,Ostertag R.Neotropical secondary forest succession:changes in structural and functional characteristics[J].Forest Ecol.Manag.,2001,148:185-206.

Comparative Analysis on the Community Characteristics of Pinus taeda and Larix kaempferi in Typical Mountainous Region of Shandong Province

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 2

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	GAO Yuan, MENG Fanxu, ZHU Kongshan, HAO Jiachen. The Main Plant Population and Community Characteristics of the Confucian Cemetery in Qufu,Shandong Province,China [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2015, 0(3): 70-77.
[2]	WANG Lin, YU Xiaoguang, HUANG Guangti. The Influence of the Natural Disasters of Freezing Rain and Snow on the Larix kaempferi and the Proposals on Restoring and Reconstructing the Vegetation——Take Enshi City of Hubei Province as an example [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2009, 0(3): 31-33.