The Selection of the Most Suitable Shelter Forest Types for Alpine Sandy Land

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2017.05.009

Abstract

Abstract:

The selection of the most suitable shelter forest types for alpine sandy land has great significance to controlling sandy land in this region.In this study,ecological service function assessment of different alpine sandy land shelter forest types was conducted in order to select the most suitable shelter forest type for this special area.Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)was used to evaluate the ecological service function of alpine sandy land shelter forest based on data obtained from Qinghai Gonghe Desert Ecosystem Research Station and expert knowledge.Selections of Caragana intermedia and Caragana Korshinskii from Artemisia desertorum,Caragana intermedia and Caragana Korshinskii on moving sand dune and Salix cheilophila and mixed forest of Salix cheilophila with Salix psammophila from Leymus secalinus,Tamarix chinensis,Salix cheilophila,mixed forest of Salix cheilophila with Salix psammophila and mixed forest of Salix cheilophila with Populus simonii on the interdune were taken as the most suitable shelter forest types for alpine sandy land.

Key words: alpine sandy land, selection of the most suitable shelter forest types, ecological service function, Analytic Hierarchy Process

CLC Number:

S727.23

FENG Lili, JIA Zhiqing, LI Qingxue, HE Lingxianzi, YANG Kaiyue. The Selection of the Most Suitable Shelter Forest Types for Alpine Sandy Land[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2017, (5): 45-51.

Figures/Tables 18

Fig.1

Tab.1

Tab.2

Fig.2

Fig.3

Tab.3

Tab.4

Tab.5

Tab.6

Tab.7

Tab.8

Tab.9

Tab.10

Tab.11

Tab.12

Tab.13

Tab.14

Tab.15

References 22

[1]	刘海涛, 贾志清, 朱雅娟, 等. 高寒沙地不同林龄乌柳的水分生理特性及叶性状[J]. 应用生态学报, 2012,23(9):2370-2376.
[2]	刘丽颖, 贾志清, 朱雅娟, 等. 高寒沙地不同林龄中间锦鸡儿的水分利用策略[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2012,26(5):119-125.
[3]	于洋, 贾志清, 朱雅娟, 等. 高寒沙地植被恢复区乌柳人工防护林对土壤的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2013,49(11):9-15. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20131102
[4]	朱雅娟, 李虹, 赵淑伶, 等. 共和盆地不同类型防护林的改善小气候效应[J].中国沙漠, 2014(34):841-848. doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00384
[5]	李海东, 沈渭寿, 刘波, 等. 西藏高寒河谷沙地不同演替阶段植被的高光谱特征[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2014,30(4):521-525.
[6]	Saaty T L. The analytic hierarchy process:planning,priority setting,resources allocation[J]. New York:McGraw, 1980.
[7]	Ramanathan R. A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2001,63(1):27-35. doi: 10.1006/jema.2001.0455 pmid: 11591027
[8]	Ismail W K W, Abdullah L, Zhang J, et al. A new environmental performance index using analytic hierarchy process:A case of ASEAN countries[J]. Environmental Skeptics and Critics, 2012.
[9]	Bottero M, Comino E, Riggio V. Application of the analytic hierarchy process and the analytic network process for the assessment of different wastewater treatment systems[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2011,26(10):1211-1224.
[10]	舒丹丹, 杜青辉. 层次分析法在沙颍河流域水量分配中的应用[J].河南水利与南水北调, 2017(5):87-88.
[11]	王弛. 层次分析法在水资源承载力评估中的应用[J]. 东北水利水电, 2017,35(3):47-50.
[12]	邓须军, 黄芷妍. 基于层次分析法的海南森林资源健康评价研究[J]. 生态经济, 2017,33(6):201-204.
[13]	刘宇恒, 邓辉, 熊倩莹. 基于层次分析法的茂县斜坡地质灾害易发性评价[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2017,34(5):31-35.
[14]	温亮, 游珍, 林裕梅, 等. 基于层次分析法的土地资源承载力评价——以宁国市为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2017,38(3):1-6.
[15]	文光菊, 邓文杰, 杨乐, 等. 基于层次分析法的重庆山区矿山泥石流潜势度评价[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2017,28(2):92-96.
[16]	张成凤, 粟晓玲, 蔡焕杰. 基于区间层次分析法的榆阳区水资源配置系统和谐性评价研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017,32(6):1053-1063.
[17]	梁存利. 模糊层次分析法在西藏草地退化研究中的应用[J].草地学报, 2017(1):172-177.
[18]	Saaty T L. Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process[M]. Rws Publications, 2000.
[19]	王晓光, 王珠娜, 余雪标, 等. 退耕还林生态效益评价指标体系研究[J].防护林科技, 2006(6):51-53.
[20]	刘军利, 秦富仓, 岳永杰, 等. 内蒙古伊金霍洛旗风沙区退耕还林还草生态效益评价[J]. 水土保持研究, 2013,20(5):104-107.
[21]	Feng H R, Lim C W, Chen L Q, et al. Sustainable Deforestation Evaluation Model and System Dynamics Analysis[J]. The Scientific World Journal, 2014. doi: 10.1155/2020/5060969 pmid: 32831806
[22]	李清雪. 共和盆地沙漠化土地典型人工植被的土壤改良效应[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院, 2014.

标度	含义
1	两个指标对某个属性具有同等重要性
3	两个指标中一个因素比另一个因素稍微重要
5	两个指标中一个因素比另一个因素比较重要
7	两个指标中一个因素比另一个因素显得十分重要
9	两个指标中一个因素比另一个因素显得绝对重要
2,4,6,8	表示上述两个标度之间折中选择
倒数	若因素a_i与因素a_j的重要性之比为a_ij,那么因素a_j与因素a_i重要性之比为a_ji=1/a_ij

n	1	2	3	4	5	6
RI	0	0	0.58	0.90	1.12	1.24
n	7	8	9	10	11
RI	1.32	1.41	1.45	1.49	1.51

高寒沙地防护林生态服务功能	改善小气候	防风固沙	固碳释氧	改善土壤	权重
改善小气候	1	1/2	1/3	1/4	0.0969	λ_max=4.1030 CI=0.0343 RI=0.90 CR=0.0381
防风固沙	2	1	1	1/3	0.2027
固碳释氧	3	1	1	1	0.2922
改善土壤	4	3	1	1	0.4081

改善小气候 (流动沙丘)	中间锦鸡儿	柠条	沙蒿	权重	一致性检验结果
中间锦鸡儿	1	1	3	0.4286	λ_max=3 CR=0
柠条	1	1	3	0.4286
沙蒿	1/3	1/3	1	0.1428

防风固沙 (流动沙丘)	中间锦鸡儿	柠条	沙蒿	权重	一致性检验结果
中间锦鸡儿	1	1	3	0.4286	λ_max=3 CR=0
柠条	1	1	3	0.4286
沙蒿	1/3	1/3	1	0.1428