FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT ›› 2019›› Issue (4): 46-51.doi: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2019.04.007
Previous Articles Next Articles
QIN Yangping1(), LI Hua1, LI Yongliang2, ZHANG Chengcheng1, WANG Meng1
Received:
2019-05-13
Revised:
2019-07-28
Online:
2019-08-28
Published:
2020-10-20
Tab.1
Descriptive statistics of modeling data and test data for each species
树种 | 数据类型 | 样本数量 | 胸径/cm | 树高/m | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均值 | 最大值 | 最小值 | 标准差 | 平均值 | 最大值 | 最小值 | 标准差 | |||||||||||||
冷杉 | 建模数据 | 172 | 32.7 | 101.8 | 6.5 | 17.4 | 19.0 | 36.0 | 4.0 | 8.4 | ||||||||||
检验数据 | 53 | 30.7 | 81.3 | 7.0 | 15.6 | 18.2 | 32.5 | 5.9 | 7.8 | |||||||||||
思茅松 | 建模数据 | 563 | 15.9 | 33.8 | 5.6 | 4.9 | 12.3 | 23.5 | 3.3 | 4.0 | ||||||||||
检验数据 | 146 | 16.1 | 34.5 | 5.1 | 5.5 | 12.4 | 23.0 | 3.8 | 4.2 | |||||||||||
云南松 | 建模数据 | 2772 | 13.6 | 36.3 | 5.0 | 4.9 | 9.3 | 26.6 | 2.2 | 3.7 | ||||||||||
检验数据 | 640 | 13.8 | 34.3 | 5.0 | 4.9 | 9.4 | 24.6 | 2.3 | 3.8 | |||||||||||
华山松 | 建模数据 | 329 | 13.0 | 41.1 | 5.4 | 5.9 | 8.5 | 22.5 | 2.8 | 3.6 | ||||||||||
检验数据 | 97 | 13.1 | 41.1 | 5.6 | 6.5 | 8.3 | 22.0 | 2.8 | 3.6 | |||||||||||
杉木 | 建模数据 | 474 | 11.7 | 35.2 | 5.1 | 4.9 | 8.7 | 19.6 | 1.9 | 3.4 | ||||||||||
检验数据 | 125 | 11.1 | 29.6 | 5.3 | 4.3 | 8.4 | 20.5 | 2.4 | 3.5 |
Tab.2
List of tree height curve models
模型编号 | 方程名称 | 公式 |
---|---|---|
1 | 幂函数 | |
2 | Wykoff等(1982) | |
3 | Bates and Watts(1980) | |
4 | Loetsh等(1973) | |
5 | Schumacher(1939) | |
6 | Mitscherlich(1919) | |
7 | Ratkowsky(1990) | |
8 | Logistic (1838) | |
9 | 修正Weibull(Yang,1978) | |
10 | Richards(1959) | |
11 | Gompertz(1825) | |
12 | 双曲线 | |
13 | 柯列尔(Rоляср,1878) | |
14 | Hossfeld (1822) | |
15 | Korf (1939) |
Tab.3
Error analysis of tree height curve models for main conifer species in Yunnan Province
树种 | 评价指标 | 模型编号 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||
冷杉 | R2 | 0.694 | 0.752 | 0.724 | 0.744 | 0.753 | 0.751 | 0.753 | 0.746 | 0.751 | 0.753 | 0.752 | 0.749 | 0.744 | 0.755 | 0.753 | ||||||||||||||
RMSE/m | 4.67 | 4.20 | 4.44 | 4.27 | 4.20 | 4.23 | 4.21 | 4.27 | 4.23 | 4.21 | 4.22 | 4.24 | 4.28 | 4.20 | 4.21 | |||||||||||||||
MAE/m | 3.82 | 3.22 | 3.57 | 3.32 | 3.24 | 3.26 | 3.24 | 3.30 | 3.25 | 3.24 | 3.24 | 3.27 | 3.34 | 3.23 | 3.25 | |||||||||||||||
TRE/% | -0.88 | 0.01 | -1.13 | -0.55 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.11 | -0.21 | -0.16 | 0.01 | -0.05 | 0.00 | -0.30 | 0.07 | 0.20 | |||||||||||||||
MPE/% | 3.70 | 3.33 | 3.51 | 3.38 | 3.33 | 3.35 | 3.34 | 3.38 | 3.35 | 3.34 | 3.34 | 3.36 | 3.39 | 3.32 | 3.34 | |||||||||||||||
思茅松 | R2 | 0.693 | 0.712 | 0.696 | 0.708 | 0.711 | 0.711 | 0.712 | 0.709 | 0.712 | 0.712 | 0.711 | 0.711 | 0.712 | 0.712 | 0.711 | ||||||||||||||
RMSE/m | 2.22 | 2.15 | 2.21 | 2.16 | 2.15 | 2.15 | 2.15 | 2.16 | 2.15 | 2.15 | 2.15 | 2.15 | 2.15 | 2.15 | 2.15 | |||||||||||||||
MAE/m | 1.81 | 1.71 | 1.80 | 1.75 | 1.71 | 1.72 | 1.72 | 1.74 | 1.72 | 1.72 | 1.72 | 1.72 | 1.72 | 1.72 | 1.72 | |||||||||||||||
TRE/% | -0.26 | 0.02 | -0.43 | -0.17 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.01 | -0.07 | -0.02 | -0.01 | -0.02 | 0.00 | -0.02 | -0.01 | 0.01 | |||||||||||||||
MPE/% | 1.50 | 1.45 | 1.49 | 1.46 | 1.45 | 1.45 | 1.45 | 1.46 | 1.45 | 1.45 | 1.45 | 1.45 | 1.45 | 1.45 | 1.45 | |||||||||||||||
云南松 | R2 | 0.665 | 0.674 | 0.665 | 0.676 | 0.671 | 0.676 | 0.676 | 0.673 | 0.676 | 0.676 | 0.676 | 0.676 | 0.676 | 0.676 | 0.676 | ||||||||||||||
RMSE/m | 2.16 | 2.13 | 2.16 | 2.12 | 2.14 | 2.12 | 2.12 | 2.14 | 2.12 | 2.12 | 2.13 | 2.12 | 2.12 | 2.12 | 2.12 | |||||||||||||||
MAE/m | 1.69 | 1.65 | 1.69 | 1.65 | 1.66 | 1.65 | 1.65 | 1.66 | 1.65 | 1.65 | 1.65 | 1.65 | 1.65 | 1.65 | 1.65 | |||||||||||||||
TRE/% | -0.34 | 0.21 | -0.61 | -0.09 | 0.31 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.11 | -0.03 | 0.00 | -0.03 | 0.00 | -0.02 | 0.00 | 0.02 | |||||||||||||||
MPE/% | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.85 | |||||||||||||||
华山松 | R2 | 0.748 | 0.735 | 0.750 | 0.746 | 0.730 | 0.751 | 0.747 | 0.728 | 0.750 | 0.750 | 0.739 | 0.752 | 0.750 | 0.750 | 0.752 | ||||||||||||||
RMSE/m | 1.81 | 1.85 | 1.80 | 1.81 | 1.87 | 1.80 | 1.81 | 1.88 | 1.80 | 1.80 | 1.84 | 1.80 | 1.80 | 1.80 | 1.80 | |||||||||||||||
MAE/m | 1.43 | 1.45 | 1.43 | 1.42 | 1.46 | 1.41 | 1.43 | 1.50 | 1.43 | 1.42 | 1.46 | 1.41 | 1.43 | 1.42 | 1.42 | |||||||||||||||
TRE/% | -0.32 | 0.31 | -0.35 | 0.19 | 0.40 | 0.00 | -0.09 | -0.36 | -0.21 | -0.19 | -0.20 | 0.00 | -0.20 | -0.19 | -0.10 | |||||||||||||||
MPE/% | 2.30 | 2.36 | 2.29 | 2.31 | 2.38 | 2.29 | 2.30 | 2.39 | 2.29 | 2.29 | 2.34 | 2.28 | 2.29 | 2.29 | 2.28 | |||||||||||||||
杉木 | R2 | 0.690 | 0.750 | 0.703 | 0.734 | 0.754 | 0.757 | 0.758 | 0.755 | 0.756 | 0.758 | 0.758 | 0.756 | 0.749 | 0.759 | 0.759 | ||||||||||||||
RMSE/m | 1.90 | 1.71 | 1.86 | 1.76 | 1.70 | 1.69 | 1.69 | 1.70 | 1.69 | 1.68 | 1.69 | 1.69 | 1.72 | 1.68 | 1.68 | |||||||||||||||
MAE/m | 1.50 | 1.30 | 1.48 | 1.35 | 1.29 | 1.28 | 1.28 | 1.28 | 1.28 | 1.28 | 1.28 | 1.29 | 1.29 | 1.28 | 1.28 | |||||||||||||||
TRE/% | -0.71 | -0.30 | -1.13 | -0.68 | -0.20 | 0.00 | 0.03 | -0.09 | -0.09 | 0.00 | -0.01 | 0.00 | -0.20 | 0.01 | 0.05 | |||||||||||||||
MPE/% | 1.97 | 1.77 | 1.93 | 1.83 | 1.76 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.76 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.78 | 1.74 | 1.74 |
Tab.4
Validation results of optimal tree height curve model for main conifer species in Yunnan Province
树种 | 模型编号 | 模型参数 | 评价指标 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a | b | c | R2 | RMSE/m | MAE/m | TRE/% | MPE/% | ||||
冷杉 | 14 | 31.22 | 606.11 | 2.01 | 0.754 | 3.95 | 3.01 | -1.49 | 6.00 | ||
思茅松 | 2 | 3.47 | -17.53 | 0.707 | 2.27 | 1.83 | 1.19 | 2.99 | |||
云南松 | 12 | 50.69 | 2522.02 | 47.72 | 0.671 | 2.21 | 1.70 | -0.46 | 1.82 | ||
华山松 | 12 | 61.73 | 4922.05 | 79.88 | 0.745 | 1.83 | 1.40 | -2.77 | 4.44 | ||
杉木 | 14 | 15.07 | 403.39 | 2.51 | 0.758 | 1.72 | 1.31 | 0.06 | 3.62 |
[1] | Temesgen H, Hann D,J, Monleon D,J . Regional Height-Diameter Equations for Major Tree Species of Southwest Oregon[J]. 2008,22:213-219. |
[2] | 张鹏, 王新杰, 许昊 . 将乐地区马尾松标准树高曲线的研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2015,35(3):69-73. |
[3] | 赵俊卉, 亢新刚, 刘燕 . 长白山主要针叶树种最优树高曲线研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2009,31(4):13-18. |
[4] | 孟宪宇 . 测树学[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2006. |
[5] | Larjavaara H C, Muller-Landau M . Measuring tree height:A quantitative comparison of two common field methods in a moist tropical forest[J]. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2013,21(5):9. |
[6] | Adame P, Del RíO M, Cañellas I . A mixed nonlinear height-diameter model for pyrenean oak(Quercus pyrenaica Willd.)[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008,256(1):88-98. |
[7] | 代忠迪, 姜立春 . 大兴安岭不同生态区域兴安落叶松树高曲线的研究[J]. 植物研究, 2015,35(4):583-589. |
[8] | 段光爽, 李学东, 冯岩 , 等. 华北落叶松天然次生林树高曲线的混合效应模型[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2018,42(2):163-169 |
[9] | 刘鑫, 王海燕, 雷相东 , 等. 基于BP神经网络的天然云冷杉针阔混交林标准树高-胸径模型[J]. 林业科学研究, 2017,30(3):368-375. |
[10] | 赵俊卉, 亢新刚, 张慧东 , 等. 长白山3个主要针叶树种的标准树高曲线[J]. 林业科学, 2010,46(10):191-194. |
[11] | 陈飞, 王健敏, 孙宝刚 , 等. 云南松的地理分布与气候关系[J]. 林业科学研究, 2012,25(2):163-168. |
[12] | 孙雪莲, 舒清态, 欧光龙 , 等. 基于随机森林回归模型的思茅松人工林生物量遥感估测[J]. 林业资源管理, 2015(1):71-76. |
[13] | 汪家社 . 杉木生态系统生物量与固碳能力的分析与评价[J]. 福建林业科技, 2008(2):1-4. |
[14] | 李元玖, 陈奇伯, 熊好琴 , 等. 滇中高原华山松人工林碳储量及固碳释氧效益[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2015,35(2):79-84. |
[15] | 李艳丽, 杨华, 亢新刚 , 等. 长白山云冷杉种群结构和动态分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2014,36(3):18-25. |
[16] | 王明亮, 唐守正 . 标准树高曲线的研制[J]. 林业科学研究, 1997(3):36-41. |
[17] | 胥辉, 全宏波, 王斌 . 思茅松标准树高曲线的研究[J]. 西南林学院学报, 2000(2):74-77. |
[18] | 王冬至, 张冬燕, 张志东 , 等. 基于非线性混合模型的针阔混交林树高与胸径关系[J]. 林业科学, 2016,52(1):30-36. |
[19] | 樊伟, 许崇华, 崔珺 , 等. 基于混合效应的大别山地区杉木树高-胸径模型比较[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017,28(9):2831-2839. |
[20] | 张懋功 . 云南年鉴[M]. 昆明: 云南年鉴社, 2017. |
[21] | Temesgen H, Gadow K V . Generalized height-diameter models—an application for major tree species in complex stands of interior British Columbia[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2004,123(1):45-51. |
[22] | 马武, 雷相东, 徐光 , 等. 蒙古栎天然林单木生长模型的研究——Ⅱ.树高-胸径模型[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2015,43(3):83-90. |
[23] | 曾伟生, 唐守正 . 立木生物量方程的优度评价和精度分析[J]. 林业科学, 2011,47(11):106-113. |
[24] | 董云飞, 孙玉军, 王轶夫 , 等. 基于BP神经网络的杉木标准树高曲线[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2014,42(7):154-156. |
[25] | 董云飞, 孙玉军, 许昊 , 等. 基于非线性混合模型的杉木标准树高曲线[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2014,42(11):72-76. |
[26] | 杜志, 甘世书 . 基于BP神经网络的杉木和马尾松树高曲线模型研究[J]. 中南林业调查规划, 2017,36(4):36-39. |
[27] | 高东启, 邓华锋, 程志楚 , 等. 基于度量误差模型方法建立的林分相容性树高曲线方程组[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2015,43(5):65-70. |
[28] | 丁贵杰 . 马尾松人工林标准树高曲线模型的研究[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 1997(3):15-20. |
[1] | WANG Yihui, NIU Xiang, WANG Bing, SONG Qingfeng. Analysis of the Forest Ecosystem Services and Driving Forces in Natural Forest Protection Project Area in Yunnan Province [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(3): 21-28. |
[2] | ZENG Weisheng, YANG Xueyun. Analysis of General Status and Examination of Estimation Errors for One-Variable Tree Volume Tables in China [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(2): 43-49. |
[3] | HU Zhongyu, SU Jianlan, LONG Qin, LI Maomei. Analysis on the Changing Tendency of Carbon Sequestration and Carbon Density of Natural Forests in Yunnan Province [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(4): 45-53. |
[4] | WEI Jianheng, ZHAO Heng, GAO Zhongliang, WANG Hechenyang, MA Zenan, WANG Qiuhua, SHU lifu, YANG Hongmei. Prediction of Shrubbery Fire in Central Yunnan Province Based on the Adaptive NeuroFuzzy Inference System [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(2): 109-116. |
[5] | TIAN Xiangyun, ZHANG Chao, CHEN Qi, SHI Xiaorong, WANG Yan. Influence of Land Use on Landscape Pattern Evolution of Rocky Desertification in Karst Areas of Yunnan,China [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(1): 61-69. |
[6] | GUAN Pingao, PENG Xingzi, CHEN Yuyong, ZHANG Hongfei, JIANG Jian, LI Shiyou. Status Quo and Improvement of Forest Fire Prevention and Control Ability in China-Myanmar Border in Yunnan Province [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2021, 0(5): 153-159. |
[7] | PU Ying, ZENG Weisheng, YANG Fan. Tree Height-Diameter Regression Models Development and One-Variable Tree Volume Tables Examination in Beijing [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2021, 0(3): 62-66. |
[8] | PENG Jiansong, ZHU Kun, XV Hui, HUANG Xiaoyuan, DAI Jiping, HUANG Ruijin. Analysis on Development of Forest Cities in Yunnan Province [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2021, 0(1): 23-29. |
[9] | WEI Anchao, ZHANG Dawei. Study on the Volume Growth Rate Model of Pinus yunnanensis of Individual Tree [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2020, 0(6): 40-46. |
[10] | ZENG Weisheng. Analysis on the Impact of Stock Volume Estimation Based on Tree Height-DBH Model at Population and Stand Level [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2019, 0(6): 38-41. |
[11] | TANG Haofan, XU Yanhong, AI Jianlin. Carbon Storage and Carbon Density of Forest Vegetation and Their Spatial Distribution Pattern in Yunnan Province [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2019, 0(5): 37-43. |
[12] | ZHANG Yi, ZHANG Chao. Study on Environmental Impact Factors of Pinus armandii Forest in Yunnan Province [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2018, 0(6): 68-75. |
[13] | YANG Ying, HUANG Guosheng, Wang Xuejun, Su Haoran, Zhi Changgui. Research on Prediction of Forest Resources and the Carbon Sequestration Potential in Yunnan Province [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2017, 0(4): 44-49. |
[14] | LUO Hengchun, WEI Anchao, HUANG Tian, YU Zhexiu, ZHANG Chao. Analysis on Dynamic Change of Biomass and Carbon Stock of Pinus yunnanensis in Yunnan,China [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2016, 0(6): 37-43. |
[15] | SONG Yongjun. Progress of Forestry Table Formulation in Yunnan Province and Its Development Strategies [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2015, 0(6): 37-40. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 203
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 376
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||