FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT ›› 2022›› Issue (2): 67-74.doi: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2022.02.010
Previous Articles Next Articles
FU Chengjie1(), GAO Wei1(
), WU Zhibin1, FANG Donglong1, LU Huahui2
Received:
2022-03-08
Revised:
2022-04-07
Online:
2022-04-28
Published:
2022-06-13
Contact:
GAO Wei
E-mail:1149878794@qq.com;gao01271@163.com
Tab.1
The basic (management) overview of three sites
立地类型 | 土壤类型 | 纬度(N) | 经度(E) | 坡向 | 海拔/m | 2018—2021年绿竹林主要管理措施 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
施肥 | 立竹量/ (株/丛) | 立竹度/ (丛/hm2) | 立竹年龄结构 (1a:2a:3a) | ||||||
低山丘陵地 | 黄红壤(壤质黏土) | 26°42'1.49″ | 118°13'21.34″ | 东南 | 111 | 每年施肥2次(4月初施笋前肥、9月中旬施养竹肥);施用绿竹专用复合肥(N,P,K含量>35%) | 6~8 | 650~750 | 3:2:1 |
农田耕作地 | 耕作土壤(水稻土) | 26°42'7.1″ | 118°13'28.02″ | 东南 | 93 | ||||
河滩冲积地 | 河滩地(砂质壤土) | 26°42'7.43″ | 118°13'32.88″ | 东南 | 91 |
Tab.3
The analysis of soil nutrient indexes of three sites
土壤养分指标 | 低山丘陵地 | 农田耕作地 | 河滩冲积地 |
---|---|---|---|
全N/(g/kg) | 1.26B | 1.39A | 0.42C |
全P/(g/kg) | 1.16A | 1.22A | 0.38B |
全K/(g/kg) | 37.97A | 38.36A | 27.50B |
有机质/(g/kg) | 19.28B | 21.76A | 10.87C |
碱解N/(mg/kg) | 88.43 | 92.91 | 83.52 |
有效P/(mg/kg) | 22.63 | 23.40 | 20.03 |
速效K/(mg/kg) | 209.11 | 214.28 | 196.89 |
pH | 4.94C | 5.20B | 5.68A |
Tab.5
The analysis of morphological indexes of different annual bamboo shoots at three sites
形态指标 | 1a生竹所产笋 | 2a生竹所产笋 | 3a生竹所产笋 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
低山丘陵地 | 农田耕作地 | 河滩冲积地 | 低山丘陵地 | 农田耕作地 | 河滩冲积地 | 低山丘陵地 | 农田耕作地 | 河滩冲积地 | |||
笋基径/cm | 8.92A | 9.06A | 8.03B | 8.72AB | 8.78AB | 8.02B | 5.97C | 6.09C | 4.65D | ||
笋长/cm | 17.93A | 18.12A | 17.20A | 17.91A | 18.02A | 16.43A | 11.64B | 11.20B | 7.98C | ||
商品笋重量/g | 456.71A | 477.11A | 414.29A | 477.21A | 458.48A | 402.82A | 245.92B | 251.82B | 168.22C | ||
去壳净重/g | 362.95ABC | 370.88AB | 312.28BC | 381.88A | 350.09ABC | 304.09C | 130.15D | 128.57D | 77.28D | ||
可食率/% | 78.95A | 77.79A | 75.16A | 79.92A | 77.24A | 75.61A | 53.09B | 51.20BC | 46.52C |
Tab.6
The analysis of nutritional components of three site bamboo shoots
营养指标 | 低山丘陵地 | 农田耕作地 | 河滩冲积地 |
---|---|---|---|
可溶性糖/(g/kg) | 124.96 A | 120.70 A | 86.44B |
粗蛋白质/(g/kg) | 227.90A | 197.57B | 159.06C |
粗纤维/(g/kg) | 69.07B | 70.14B | 73.50A |
氨基酸总量/(g/kg) | 95.98A | 79.44B | 32.08C |
N/(g/kg) | 5.79 | 5.57 | 5.98 |
P/(g/kg) | 3.88 | 3.72 | 3.76 |
K/(g/kg) | 47.61 | 44.69 | 43.13 |
含水率/% | 90.86 | 90.11 | 89.46 |
[1] | 郑郁善, 高培军, 吴擢溪, 等. 绿竹笋营养成分及笋期叶养分的施肥效应[J]. 林业科学, 2004, 40(6):79-84. |
[2] | 张迎辉, 陈礼光, 凡莉莉, 等. 保水剂与氮肥协同作用对绿竹抗性生理影响的综合评价[J]. 西南林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2019, 39(5):43-50. |
[3] | 杨校生, 谢锦忠, 马占兴, 等. 17种丛生竹笋的感官与营养品质评价[J]. 林业科技开发, 2001, 15(5):16-18. |
[4] | 缪妙青, 缪碧华. 福建省绿竹资源现状及发展对策[J]. 竹子研究汇刊, 2005, 24(4):48-51. |
[5] | 徐森, 杨丽婷, 陈双林, 等. 竹笋适口性形成及其主要影响因素研究综述[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2021, 38(2):403-411. |
[6] | 何玉友, 陈双林, 郭子武, 等. 覆盖雷竹笋色泽与品质相关性分析[J]. 林业科学研究, 2021, 34(6):157-167. |
[7] | 陈鸿. 不同土壤类型绿竹林笋营养特征研究[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2007, 13(18):194-195. |
[8] | 董建文, 高瑞龙. 不同地类绿竹栽培效果研究[J]. 山西农业大学学报, 2000(3):253-256. |
[9] | 骆绪美, 韩文妍, 岳祥华, 等. 不同竹种对土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 林业科技开发, 2015, 29(2):31-34. |
[10] | 叶晶, 陶立华, 柯和佳, 等. 绿竹地上部营养元素的吸收、积累和分配特性[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(4):545-550. |
[11] | 郑蓉. 绿竹不同产地土壤养分含量的综合分析[J]. 西南林学院学报, 2009, 29(5):46-50. |
[12] | 郑蓉. 产地绿竹笋品质及土壤养分的主成分与典型相关分析[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(5):710-714. |
[13] | 郑蓉, 杨杰, 吴承文, 等. 不同土壤类型对绿竹笋营养成分的影响[J]. 福建林业科技, 2019, 46(3):62-67. |
[14] | 郑蓉, 郑维鹏, 方伟, 等. 绿竹笋形态性状与营养成分的产地差异分析[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2010, 27(6):845-850. |
[15] | 朱勇. 绿竹笋表形性状的多样性研究与分级建议[J]. 林业科技, 2018, 43(6):38-41. |
[16] | 朱勇, 罗朝光. 绿竹笋营养成分的测定与分析[J]. 经济林研究, 2012, 30(3):103-105. |
[17] | 杨杰, 郑蓉, 温晓芸, 等. 福建省绿竹栽培管理存在的主要问题与对策[J]. 福建林业科技, 2021, 48(2):115-121. |
[18] | 黄勇. 绿竹地下茎发笋生物学特性研究[J]. 西南林学院学报, 2008, 28(5):39-41. |
[19] | 洪伟, 吴承祯, 陈辉, 等. 山地绿竹配方施肥技术[J]. 福建林学院学报, 2006, 26(1):1-5. |
[20] | 夏海涛, 王月英, 李效文, 等. 浙南绿竹不同产区土壤肥力调查与分析[J]. 林业科技, 2014, 39(1):54-57. |
[21] | 范少辉, 刘广路, 苏文会, 等. 竹林培育研究进展[J]. 林业科学研究, 2018, 31(1):137-144. |
[22] | 胡文杰, 庞宏东, 胡兴宜, 等. 不同经营措施对鄂南毛竹笋用低产林形态特征及产量的影响[J]. 西南林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2019, 39(2):86-91. |
[23] | 董炜华, 李晓强, 宋扬. 土壤动物在土壤有机质形成中的作用[J]. 土壤, 2016, 48(2):211-218. |
[24] | 丁瑞兴, 刘友兆, 孙玉华. 我国亚热带湿润区土壤系统分类参比[J]. 土壤, 1999,(2):42-48. |
[25] | 李海东, 沈渭寿, 邹长新, 等. 雅鲁藏布江山南宽谷风沙化土地土壤养分和粒度特征[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(16):4981-4992. |
[26] | 岳晋军, 朱燕琳, 袁金玲. 绿竹笋用林长周期母竹留养模式研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2021, 45(5):31-37. |
[27] | 傅成杰. 绿竹地下系统结构与出笋量的技术研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2013. |
[28] | 傅成杰, 陈礼光, 杨旺利, 等. 绿竹地下蔸系结构与出笋量关系的研究[J]. 世界竹藤通讯, 2015, 13(2):6-10. |
[29] | 周益权, 顾小平, 吴晓丽, 等. 丛生竹秆基各笋目的出笋成竹生物学特性研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2011, 24(3):314-320. |
[30] | 徐森, 谷瑞, 陈双林, 等. 毛竹春笋营养、食味和基于重金属的安全品质的海拔效应[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2021, 43(1):144-152. |
[31] | 黄志远, 钟哲科, 张小平, 等. 毛竹林大小年形成机制及调控措施研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2021, 34(5):20-25. |
[32] | 陆景陵. 植物营养学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2002. |
[1] | LIU Yan, NIU Xiang, WANG Bing. Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Habitat Quality and Its Prediction in Luoxiao Mountain Area in the Past 25 Years [J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2023, 0(6): 39-51. |
[2] | YUAN Yuan, SHENG Yan, LIU Linfu, WANG Shuo, LI Juan, AN Li. Spatial-Temporal Evolution Characteristics and Driving Influence Mechanism of Habitat Quality in Kuye River Basin [J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2023, 0(6): 67-74. |
[3] | XIE Zhuohong, CHEN Peitong, FU Shipei, CHEN Anjun, LI Wei, LIANG Xinling, LEI Min, LIU Ping. Plant Diversity and Influencing Factors on Different Plant Community in Zengcheng Forest Farm [J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2023, 0(5): 63-71. |
[4] | HE Binyuan, ZENG Rong, DAI Puying, PAN Dan, FANG Yuanyuan, WEI Liquan. Research on the Evaluation and Influencing Factors of High-Quality Development of Forest Cities in Guangxi [J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2023, 0(5): 89-97. |
[5] | HUA Weiping, WU Jianwei, YU Liyao, WANG Yanan, WU Chengzhen, ZHUANG Chongyang, CHI Shangping, JIANG Xidian. Forestland Grading Based on Forest Potential Productivity Evaluation Model and Its Application [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(3): 29-37. |
[6] | HU Yanjie, ZHANG Kun, LI Ming, ZHAO Guangshuai, WANG Yixuan. Analysis on the Management Mechanism for Accelerating the Green and High Quality Development of State-Owned Forest Farms in the New Period [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(zk1): 39-45. |
[7] | ZHAO Rong, LI He. Countermeasures and Suggestions for High-Quality Development of State-Owned Forest Farms [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(zk1): 46-51. |
[8] | HU Weijiang, LI Jiayi, NIU Mingyue, LIU Haiying. Analysis on the Effect of High-Quality Development of State-Owned Forest Farms in Zhejiang Province [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(zk1): 59-65. |
[9] | WANG Hui, CHEN Aitao, XU Li. Effects of Different Tending Methods on Tree Growth and Soil Nutrients in Secondary Birch Forest [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(zk1): 85-90. |
[10] | PENG Tailai, HUANG Junwei, LIU Jinshan, QI Jianwen. Quality Evaluation of Natural Forest Resources Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(6): 82-88. |
[11] | LIU Lijie, XIE Zhuohong, LEI Ming, SHI Yuemou, LI Shengqiang, LIU Ping. Evaluation of Forest Quality Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process —A Case Study in Liuxihe Forest Farm,Guangzhou [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(6): 89-94. |
[12] | YAN Shu, DENG Houyin, HU Dehuo, WANG Runhui, WEI Ruping, ZHENG Huiquan, ZOU Yihua, CHEN Xiawei. Comprehensive Quality Evaluation of the Pure and Mixed Cunninghamia lanceolata Stands of the Ecological Public-Welfare Forests in Northern Guangdong [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(5): 69-75. |
[13] | QIU Tianqi, WANG Xiangrong. Research on the Temporal and Spatial Evolution of Habitat Quality in Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan Urban Agglomeration Based on InVEST Model [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(5): 99-106. |
[14] | LI Xiaoying, QIN Wenjing, XU Yanhong, WANG Yuechao, YANG Neng, YANG Ben. Understory Species Diversity and its Relationship with Soil Propertiesof theTypical Public Welfare Forests in Central Yunnan [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(4): 148-156. |
[15] | TANG Xiaoping. Realization Path of High-Quality Development of National Parks [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(3): 1-11. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 190
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 395
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||