Study on Physiochemical Properties of Soil of Different Land Use Types in Caohai,Weining of Guizhou Province

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2020.05.020

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to explore the differences in physiochemical properties of soil of different land resource utilization modes in Chaohai,Weining in Guizhou Province,the soils in different soil layers(0-20 cm,20-40 cm,40-60 cm) under six different land use types(grassland,farmland,Camellia sinensis shrub,Cunninghamia lanceolata forest,Populus yunnanensis forest and conifer-broadleaf forest) were chosen as the research objects.The effects of different land use types on soil quality were studied by measuring and analyzing physical structure and nutrient content of soil.The results showed that:1) The total nutrient and organic carbon contents of soil in Caohai watershed were at a medium-low level in China,the available nutrient contents were low in nitrogen,high in phosphorus,and medium in potassium,the soil nutrient contents were unbalanced and mainly limited by nitrogen.2) The structure and nutrient content of soil were different due to different land use patterns.The average soil bulk density of the grassland was the largest and the conifer-broadleaf forest was the smallest.The porosity of Populus yunnanensis forest was the largest and that of grassland and farmland was the smallest.The total nutrient content of Camellia sinensis shrub was higher than that of other sites soil,the soil organic carbon,available phosphorus and available potassium content of conifer and broadleaf mixed forest was the highest,the content of alkali-hydrolysable nitrogen in grassland was the highest.3) The organic carbon content of soil was related to the physical structure and the content of nitrogen,phosphorus and potassium soil on the basis of Pearson coefficients analysis,indicating that the addition of organic matter is conducive to improving soil physical and chemical properties.4) From the perspective of soil quality recovery,the arbor and shrub stands are beneficial to improve soil quality.

Key words: Caohai of Guizhou province, land use pattern, physical properties, nutrient

CLC Number:

S714.2

HOU Chunlan, YANG Rui, YANG Baoyong, LIU Zhi, QU Shuang, WU Jiawei. Study on Physiochemical Properties of Soil of Different Land Use Types in Caohai,Weining of Guizhou Province[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2020, (5): 138-143.

Figures/Tables 4

Tab.1

Tab.2

Tab.3

Nutrition content of soil in different land use patterns

土层深度	立地类型	有机碳 g/kg	全氮 g/kg	全磷 g/kg	全钾 g/kg	碱解氮 mg/kg	有效磷 mg/kg	速效钾 mg/kg
0~20cm	G	12.71±0.82b	0.18±0.00d	0.49±0.02ab	14.87±0.25a	66.33±2.03b	37.93±2.20d	110.03±6.76d
	F	15.00±0.87b	0.57±0.01c	0.20±0.00c	13.05±0.09a	35.00±4.04c	65.44±0.59c	64.26±3.76e
	C	11.89±0.92b	1.30±0.05a	0.60±0.02a	15.81±0.71a	30.67±2.96c	124.10±4.92b	176.28±8.50b
	CL	14.35±0.66b	0.91±0.09b	0.58±0.07a	8.03±0.07b	84.67±5.81a	22.15±1.29d	179.79±16.57b
	PY	13.85±1.24b	0.55±0.01c	0.44±0.01b	14.33±3.17a	37.67±2.73c	19.64±1.42d	142.65±8.50c
	CB	18.44±1.34a	0.50±0.02c	0.51±0.05ab	12.58±0.80a	40.33±0.67c	196.70±16.65a	247.76±12.79a
	CV/%	18.07	55.44	31.25	24.91	42.34	85.74	40.00
20~40cm	G	11.73±0.36b	0.12±0.00d	0.33±0.07b	13.28±0.15ab	52.33±2.73a	26.92±1.77c	78.83±0.60cd
	F	6.33±1.00c	0.21±0.01cd	0.11±0.00c	15.65±0.52a	29.00±2.65bc	26.25±1.16c	68.99±3.07d
	C	7.66±0.15c	0.79±0.11a	0.56±0.03a	15.25±0.67a	23.67±2.03c	93.66±8.63b	127.23±2.80b
	CL	11.89±0.91b	0.23±0.01cd	0.45±0.08ab	4.10±0.19d	23.33±1.67c	20.97±1.56c	102.00±9.73c
	PY	6.53±0.62c	0.32±0.02bc	0.35±0.01b	6.63±0.19c	35.33±3.48b	17.42±0.44c	83.79±11.12cd
	CB	15.47±0.26a	0.41±0.06b	0.32±0.04b	12.02±0.60b	36.00±5.29b	135.83±14.27a	155.96±9.11a
	CV/%	35.96	67.99	44.76	40.34	33.57	88.72	32.02
40~60cm	G	10.78±0.42b	0.09±0.00c	0.16±0.06c	12.63±0.20ab	38.00±2.08a	19.57±3.34bc	47.79±3.36c
	F	4.54±1.28d	0.13±0.00c	0.11±0.00c	12.90±0.83a	26.00±1.73b	14.23±2.31c	63.32±0.95bc
	C	8.06±0.79c	0.25±0.03b	0.46±0.02a	12.90±1.18a	16.00±1.00c	64.85±5.00a	95.70±13.42a
	CL	6.29±0.50cd	0.13±0.01c	0.31±0.01b	3.33±0.12d	17.67±1.45c	18.60±0.97bc	85.19±9.19ab
	PY	12.02±0.74b	0.39±0.03a	0.31±0.03b	5.86±0.21c	17.33±0.67c	16.68±0.64bc	84.30±3.41ab
	CB	16.27±0.70a	0.28±0.06b	0.28±0.04b	10.76±0.51b	35.67±1.67a	28.65±7.20b	106.91±5.29a
	CV/%	43.06	55.40	45.99	41.05	37.58	69.68	28.39

Tab.3

Tab.4

References 21

[1]	Luuk F, Filomena D, Irmgard E. A conceptual framework for the assessment of multiple functions of agro-ecosystems:A case study of Trás-os-Montes olive groves[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2008,25(1):141-155. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.08.003
[2]	秦红, 李昌晓, 任庆水. 不同土地利用方式对三峡库区消落带土壤细菌和真菌多样性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2017,37(10):3494-3504. doi: 10.5846/stxb201603030374
[3]	张静, 高云华, 张池, 等. 不同土地利用方式下赤红壤生物学性状及其与土壤肥力的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013,24(12):3423-3430.
[4]	Wang Luying, Yu Xiaofei, Xue Zhenshan, et al. Distribution characteristics of iron,carbon,nitrogen and phosphorus in the surface soils of different land use types near Xingkai Lake[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2019,19(1):275-285. doi: 10.1007/s11368-018-2044-x
[5]	牛昱涵, 施曼, 王心怡, 等. 苏南地区农业土地利用方式改变对土壤理化及生物学性质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019,25(10):1657-1668.
[6]	李雄, 张旭博, 孙楠, 等. 不同土地利用方式对土壤有机无机碳比例的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018,24(6):1508-1519.
[7]	冉晨, 白晓永, 谭秋, 等. 典型喀斯特地区石漠化景观格局对土地利用变化的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2018,38(24):8901-8910. doi: 10.5846/stxb201807231576
[8]	陈欢, 白晓永, 李阳兵, 等. 铜仁市万山喀斯特地区石漠化演变及其对土地利用变化的响应[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2020,37(1):24-35.
[9]	任秀秀, 陈永祥, 冯图, 等. 贵州威宁草海湿地的研究现状[J]. 贵州工程应用技术学院学报, 2017,35(3):18-34.
[10]	秦趣, 陈忠全, 姚世美. 贵州威宁草海湿地生态安全评价[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2018,39(2):27-33.
[11]	LY-T1215-1999, 森林土壤水分-物理性质的测定[S].
[12]	杨金玲, 张甘霖, 赵玉国, 等. 城市土壤压实对土壤水分特征的影响——以南京市为例[J]. 土壤学报, 2006(1):33-38.
[13]	全国土壤普查办公室. 中国土壤普查技术[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1992.
[14]	纪文婧, 程小琴, 韩海荣, 等. 山西太岳山好地方典型植被类型土壤理化特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016,35(1):141-148.
[15]	高君亮, 罗凤敏, 高永, 等. 农牧交错带不同土地利用类型土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2019,39(15):5594-5602.
[16]	张波, 史正军, 张朝, 等. 深圳城市绿地土壤孔隙状况与水分特征研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012,28(4):299-304.
[17]	王玲玲, 戴全厚. 贵州威宁草海沙河小流域土壤养分分布特征研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2013(7):181-184.
[18]	吴丽芳, 王紫泉, 王妍, 等. 喀斯特高原不同石漠化程度土壤C、N、P化学计量特征和酶活性的关系[J]. 生态环境学报, 2019,28(12):2332-2340.
[19]	李守娟, 杨磊, 陈利顶, 等. 长三角典型城郊土地利用变化及其土壤碳氮响应[J]. 生态学报, 2018,38(20):7178-7188. doi: 10.5846/stxb201804210909
[20]	白小芳, 徐福利, 王渭玲, 等. 华北落叶松人工林土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2015,13(6):68-75.
[21]	张珍明, 林绍霞, 张清海, 等. 不同土地利用方式下草海高原湿地土壤碳、氮、磷分布特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2013,27(6):199-204.

土地利用类型	主要植被	群落起源	海拔/m	群落平均高度/m	土壤类型
草地	白茅Imperata cylindrica 蒲公英Taraxacum mongolicum	天然	2215	0.2	黄壤
耕地	玉米Zea mays 阳芋Solanum tuberosum	人工	2183	1.8	黄壤
茶叶林	茶树Camellia sinensis 桃Amygdalus persica 苹果Malus pumila	人工	2258	0.5	黄壤
杉木林	杉木Cunninghamia lanceolata	人工	2172	16	棕壤
滇杨林	滇杨Populus yunnanensis	人工	2178	15	棕壤
针阔混交林	栾树Koelreuteria paniculata 滇杨Populus yunnanensis 柏木Cupressus funebris	人工	2185	10	棕壤

土层深度	立地类型	容重g/cm³	总孔隙度/%	毛管孔隙度/%	非毛管孔隙度/%
0~20cm	G	1.28±0.05a	42.33±4.53c	41.26±4.73b	1.07±0.39b
	F	0.93±0.03c	42.82±5.10c	41.37±5.25b	1.45±0.37b
	C	1.29±0.08a	45.21±3.24bc	43.84±3.49ab	1.37±0.51b
	CL	1.07±0.07b	48.24±3.82abc	47.25±3.92a	0.99±0.28b
	PY	1.24±0.05a	51.06±3.40ab	47.97±2.66a	3.09±1.83a
	CB	1.12±0.03b	51.59±5.06a	49.29±4.13a	2.30±1.24ab
	CV/%	11.59	11.37	10.77	68.35
20~40cm	G	1.45±0.06a	37.02±5.68cd	35.91±5.82bc	1.11±0.70b
	F	1.20±0.05c	40.80±4.11c	40.00±3.80b	0.79±0.31b
	C	1.30±0.04b	42.17±1.59c	41.01±2.26b	1.16±0.98b
	CL	1.44±0.08a	33.60±5.71d	32.81±5.67c	0.79±0.17b
	PY	1.29±0.08b	55.87±4.87a	53.13±5.25a	2.74±1.10a
	CB	1.17±0.03c	49.77±2.47b	47.86±2.54a	1.91±0.99ab
	CV/%	9.22	20.19	19.60	71.02
40~60cm	G	1.47±0.23a	33.06±8.49bc	32.27±8.48b	0.78±0.41cd
	F	1.38±0.02a	31.60±3.04c	31.09±3.08b	0.51±0.06d
	C	1.19±0.05b	38.52±0.68b	36.30±1.56b	2.21±1.21b
	CL	1.40±0.09a	36.88±3.56bc	35.68±3.16b	1.20±0.48cd
	PY	1.09±0.06b	53.71±1.62a	49.23±1.40a	4.48±0.38a
	CB	1.16±0.03b	51.78±1.67a	50.20±1.71a	1.58±0.25bc
	CV/%	13.82	22.93	21.77	77.17

理化性质	有机碳	全氮	全磷	全钾	碱解氮	有效磷	速效钾
有机碳	1	0.274^*	0.262	0.085	0.385^**	0.429^**	0.562^**
全氮	0.274^*	1	0.597^**	0.238	0.202	0.453^**	0.594^**
全磷	0.262	0.597^**	1	0.011	0.271^*	0.417^**	0.644^**
全钾	0.085	0.238	0.011	1	0.135	0.346^*	0.149
碱解氮	0.385^**	0.202	0.271^*	0.135	1	-0.044	0.313^*
有效磷	0.429^**	0.453^**	0.417^**	0.346^*	-0.044	1	0.714^**
速效钾	0.562^**	0.594^**	0.644^**	0.149	0.313^*	0.714^**	1
容重	-0.454^**	-0.314^*	-0.011	-0.137	-0.185	-0.255	-0.193
总孔隙度	0.427^**	0.316^*	0.242	-0.023	0.156	0.191	0.381^**
毛管孔隙度	0.418^**	0.322^*	0.254	0.012	0.199	0.193	0.387^**
非毛管孔隙度	0.286^*	0.133	0.047	-0.234	-0.195	0.086	0.159