FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT ›› 2018›› Issue (2): 58-64.doi: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2018.02.011
• Scientific Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
QIN Suitao(), LONG Cuiling(
), WU Bangli
Received:
2018-02-06
Revised:
2018-04-14
Online:
2018-04-28
Published:
2020-09-22
Contact:
LONG Cuiling
E-mail:1764993215@qq.com;longcuiling898@163.com
CLC Number:
QIN Suitao, LONG Cuiling, WU Bangli. Study on Niche of Dominant Shrub Populations in Karst Forest in Maolan Nature Reserve,Guizhou Province[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2018, (2): 58-64.
Tab.2
The importance value of dominant shrub populations in different terrains
种类 | 坡地 | 槽谷 | 漏斗 | Σ |
---|---|---|---|---|
皱叶海桐Pittospoeum crispulum | 12.10 | 6.91 | 26.35 | 45.36 |
革叶铁榄Sinosideroxylon wightianum | 12.47 | 8.23 | 14.74 | 35.44 |
裂果卫矛Euonymus dielsianus | 17.17 | 9.53 | 7.60 | 34.30 |
南天竹Nandina domestica | 15.04 | 9.39 | 9.71 | 34.15 |
湖北十大功劳Mahonia fortunei | 7.65 | 9.98 | 3.10 | 20.73 |
石岩枫Mallotus repandus | 7.08 | 5.26 | 7.63 | 19.97 |
球核荚蒾Viburnum propinquum | 6.90 | 9.69 | 0.99 | 17.58 |
异叶梁王茶Nothopanax davidii | 1.22 | 11.30 | 1.21 | 13.73 |
长梗罗伞Brassaiopsis glomerulata | 0 | 6.60 | 1.03 | 7.63 |
中华蚊母树Distylium chinense | 4.57 | 1.52 | 0.31 | 6.39 |
胡颓子Elaeaganus pungens | 0 | 2.24 | 4.13 | 6.37 |
粗丝木Gomphandra tetrandra | 1.37 | 1.93 | 3.00 | 6.31 |
苦木Picrasma quassioides | 1.20 | 0.76 | 3.13 | 5.09 |
六月雪Serissa japonica | 2.41 | 0 | 2.00 | 4.41 |
Tab.3
The niche breadth of dominant shrub populations in different terrains
序号 | 种类 | ||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 皱叶海桐Pittospoeum crispulum | 0.4145 | 0.6577 |
2 | 革叶铁榄Sinosideroxylon wightianum | 0.4653 | 0.9257 |
3 | 裂果卫矛Euonymus dielsianus | 0.4500 | 0.8268 |
4 | 南天竹Nandina domestica | 0.4663 | 0.9261 |
5 | 湖北十大功劳Mahonia fortunei | 0.4429 | 0.8102 |
6 | 石岩枫Mallotus repandus | 0.4719 | 0.9660 |
7 | 球核荚蒾Viburnum propinquum | 0.3721 | 0.5839 |
8 | 异叶梁王茶Nothopanax davidii | 0.2561 | 0.2216 |
9 | 长梗罗伞Brassaiopsis glomerulata | 0.1715 | 0.1518 |
10 | 中华蚊母树Distylium chinense | 0.3165 | 0.3793 |
11 | 胡颓子Elaeaganus pungens | 0.2817 | 0.4192 |
12 | 粗丝木Gomphandra tetrandra | 0.4549 | 0.8592 |
13 | 苦木Picrasma quassioides | 0.4010 | 0.5959 |
14 | 六月雪Serissa japonica | 0.2991 | 0.4911 |
Tab.4
The niche similarity of dominant shrub populations in different terrains
物种 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.8350 | 0.6405 | 0.7035 | 0.5841 | 0.8012 | 0.4750 | 0.3293 | 0.2868 | 0.4676 | 0.7332 | 0.8457 | 0.9658 | 0.7195 | |
2 | 0.8055 | 0.8685 | 0.7491 | 0.9663 | 0.6401 | 0.4093 | 0.3669 | 0.6326 | 0.6483 | 0.8657 | 0.8007 | 0.7677 | ||
3 | 0.9370 | 0.8066 | 0.8393 | 0.7266 | 0.4550 | 0.4126 | 0.7864 | 0.4995 | 0.7169 | 0.6063 | 0.7220 | |||
4 | 0.8036 | 0.9022 | 0.7236 | 0.4521 | 0.4096 | 0.7264 | 0.5595 | 0.7769 | 0.6692 | 0.7250 | ||||
5 | 0.7828 | 0.8910 | 0.6484 | 0.6060 | 0.6494 | 0.5169 | 0.6890 | 0.5498 | 0.5286 | |||||
6 | 0.6738 | 0.4404 | 0.3980 | 0.6403 | 0.6456 | 0.8630 | 0.7670 | 0.7366 | ||||||
7 | 0.6962 | 0.6075 | 0.6784 | 0.4078 | 0.5800 | 0.4408 | 0.4486 | |||||||
8 | 0.9113 | 0.3746 | 0.4401 | 0.4836 | 0.3263 | 0.1770 | ||||||||
9 | 0.2859 | 0.4864 | 0.4411 | 0.2839 | 0.1346 | |||||||||
10 | 0.2859 | 0.5033 | 0.4334 | 0.5959 | ||||||||||
11 | 0.7826 | 0.7645 | 0.4527 | |||||||||||
12 | 0.8428 | 0.6701 | ||||||||||||
13 | 0.6882 | |||||||||||||
14 |
Tab.5
The niche overlap of dominant shrub populations in different terrains
物种 | Lih | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||
Lhi | 1 | 0.2862 | 0.2350 | 0.2506 | 0.2042 | 0.2753 | 0.1707 | 0.1546 | 0.1620 | 0.1967 | 0.3320 | 0.2942 | 0.3419 | 0.3157 | |||||||||||||||
2 | 0.3525 | 0.3163 | 0.3205 | 0.2909 | 0.3277 | 0.2751 | 0.2463 | 0.2443 | 0.3103 | 0.3339 | 0.3286 | 0.3549 | 0.3620 | ||||||||||||||||
3 | 0.2694 | 0.2943 | 0.3184 | 0.3092 | 0.2965 | 0.3203 | 0.2589 | 0.2392 | 0.3840 | 0.2135 | 0.2649 | 0.2615 | 0.3310 | ||||||||||||||||
4 | 0.3087 | 0.3206 | 0.3422 | 0.3202 | 0.3207 | 0.3237 | 0.2762 | 0.2627 | 0.3743 | 0.2673 | 0.3000 | 0.3041 | 0.3516 | ||||||||||||||||
5 | 0.2312 | 0.2673 | 0.3053 | 0.2941 | 0.2761 | 0.3598 | 0.3798 | 0.3757 | 0.3315 | 0.2383 | 0.2639 | 0.2249 | 0.2391 | ||||||||||||||||
6 | 0.3486 | 0.3370 | 0.3277 | 0.3296 | 0.3089 | 0.2988 | 0.2756 | 0.2731 | 0.3266 | 0.3327 | 0.3321 | 0.3498 | 0.3587 | ||||||||||||||||
7 | 0.1599 | 0.2092 | 0.2617 | 0.2461 | 0.2976 | 0.2209 | 0.3567 | 0.3503 | 0.2991 | 0.1664 | 0.2031 | 0.1512 | 0.1736 | ||||||||||||||||
8 | 0.0963 | 0.1246 | 0.1408 | 0.1398 | 0.2091 | 0.1356 | 0.2374 | 0.3483 | 0.1265 | 0.1668 | 0.1508 | 0.0953 | 0.0426 | ||||||||||||||||
9 | 0.0912 | 0.1117 | 0.1175 | 0.1201 | 0.1869 | 0.1214 | 0.2107 | 0.3147 | 0.0921 | 0.1702 | 0.1431 | 0.0921 | 0.0265 | ||||||||||||||||
10 | 0.1494 | 0.1914 | 0.2545 | 0.2308 | 0.2225 | 0.1959 | 0.2426 | 0.1541 | 0.1242 | 0.0674 | 0.1472 | 0.1369 | 0.2420 | ||||||||||||||||
11 | 0.2636 | 0.2153 | 0.1479 | 0.1723 | 0.1672 | 0.2086 | 0.1411 | 0.2125 | 0.2400 | 0.0705 | 0.2552 | 0.2766 | 0.1798 | ||||||||||||||||
12 | 0.3455 | 0.3133 | 0.2714 | 0.2859 | 0.2738 | 0.3079 | 0.2547 | 0.2842 | 0.2984 | 0.2276 | 0.3773 | 0.3533 | 0.3031 | ||||||||||||||||
13 | 0.3236 | 0.2728 | 0.2160 | 0.2336 | 0.1881 | 0.2615 | 0.1529 | 0.1447 | 0.1549 | 0.1706 | 0.3297 | 0.2848 | 0.2976 | ||||||||||||||||
14 | 0.2703 | 0.2516 | 0.2473 | 0.2444 | 0.1808 | 0.2425 | 0.1587 | 0.0585 | 0.0403 | 0.2728 | 0.1939 | 0.2210 | 0.2692 |
[1] | 陈瑞国, 范少辉, 刘广路, 等. 海南岛次生低地雨林棕榈藤伴生群落优势种生态位研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2017,37(6):1226-1233. |
[2] | 杨利民, 周广胜, 王国宏. 草地群落物种多样性维持机制的研究Ⅱ 物种实现生态位[J]. 植物生态学报, 2001,25(5):634-638. |
[3] | 苏志尧, 吴大荣, 陈北光. 粤北天然林优势种群生态位研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2003,14(1):25-29. |
[4] | 史小华, 许晓波, 张文辉. 秦岭冷杉群落主要种群生态位研究[J]. 植物研究, 2007,27(3):345-349. |
[5] | 胡正华, 钱海源, 于明坚. 古田山国家级自然保护区甜槠林优势种群生态位[J]. 生态学报, 2009,29(7):3670-3677. |
[6] | 刘巍, 曹伟. 长白山云冷杉群落主要种群生态位特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2011,30(8):1766-1774. |
[7] | 钟军弟, 李先琨, 叶铎, 等. 广西木论国家级自然保护区铁榄群落优势种群的生态位研究[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2009,18(3):38-43. |
[8] | 覃弦, 龙翠玲, 李娟. 茂兰喀斯特森林不同演替阶段优势乔木种群生态位研究[J]. 西南大学学报:自然科学版, 2017,39(6):42-49. |
[9] | 周政贤. 茂兰喀斯特森林科学考察综合报告[C]//周政贤.茂兰喀斯特森林科学考察集.贵阳: 贵州人民出版社, 1987: 1-23. |
[10] | 刘映良, 薛建辉. 贵州茂兰退化喀斯特森林群落的数量特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2005,29(3):23-27. |
[11] | 龙翠玲. 不同地形部位喀斯特森林物种多样性的比较研究——以贵州茂兰自然保护区为例[J]. 中国岩溶, 2007,26(1):55-60. |
[12] | 吴鹏, 崔迎春, 杨婷, 等. 茂兰喀斯特森林主要演替群落土壤呼吸研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2013,37(4):57-62. |
[13] |
张忠华, 胡刚, 倪健. 茂兰喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶混交林树种的空间分布格局及其分形特征[J]. 生态学报, 2015,35(24):8221-8230.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201406061172 |
[14] | 朱守谦, 魏鲁明. 茂兰喀斯特森林群落结构研究[C]//朱守谦.喀斯特森林生态研究(I).贵阳: 贵州科技出版社, 1993: 12-21. |
[15] | 杨允菲, 祝廷成. 植物生态学[M].2版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2011: 29-31. |
[16] | Levins R. Evolution in changing environments some theoretical Explorations[M]. Princeton:Princeton University press, 1968. |
[17] |
Hurlbert S H. The measurement of niche overlap and some relatives[J]. Ecology, 1978,59(1):67-77.
doi: 10.2307/1936632 |
[18] | Whittaker R H, Levin S A. Niche:theory and application.Dowden Hutchinson and Ross,Inc., 1975. |
[19] | 王伯荪, 李鸣光, 彭少麟. 植物种群学[M]. 广州: 广东高等教育出版社, 1995: 132-148. |
[20] | 赵永华, 雷瑞德, 何兴元, 等. 秦岭锐齿栎林种群生态位特征研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004,15(6):913-918. |
[21] | 陈子林, 张志祥, 刘鹏, 等. 浙江六十田常绿阔叶林主要乔木种生态位研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2007,27(6):77-82. |
[1] | LUO Wen, LI Yanpeng, XU Han, QIN Wenhao, LIU Daye, MO Shiqin. Characteristics of Suitable Communities of Hopea hainanensis, a Wild Plant with Extremely Small Populations in National Park of Hainan Tropical Rainforest [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(4): 98-106. |
[2] | YAO Huifang, LU Jie, QU Xingle, WANG Chao, ZHANG Xinsheng, WANG Jianke. Niche Characteristics of Main Shrub and Grass Plants under Pinus armandii Forest in Southeast Tibet [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2021, 0(6): 69-75. |
[3] | LUO Wen, ZHONG Yufei, XUE Shaoliang, LI Xiaoguang, LIANG Lu, HU Hai. The Study on Niche of Cinnamomum rigidissimum and Dominant Populations in Different Communities in Jianfengling [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2021, 0(5): 160-167. |
[4] | QIN Xian, LONG Cuiling. Population Structure and Quantitative Dynamics of Dominant Arbor Species at Different Succession Stages in Maolan Karst Forest [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2016, 0(6): 57-63. |
[5] | CUI Xueqing, MA Hongping, HUANG Guilin, HOU Meng, XU Ming, ZHENG Guoqiang, CUI Beixiang, ZHUO Ling, LIAO Chengzhang. Research on the Land Suitable for Planting 6 Major Tree Species in Qinghai Province [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2016, 0(4): 74-78. |
[6] | ZHENG Zhenyu, LONG Cuiling. Interspecific Association of Woody Plant Species at Different Topography Sites in Maolan Karst Forest [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2014, 0(4): 78-84. |
[7] | ZHAO Li, ZHANG Pengtao, YAO Yunxiao. Niche of Land Use and Sustainable Development of Shijiazhuang City [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2013, 0(2): 119-124. |
[8] | YANG Zisong, QUAN Qinmei. The Niche of the Plant Community of the Barren Hillsides in the Arid Valley of the Upper Reach of the Minjiang River [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2012, 0(6): 81-86. |
[9] | XIE Yanjun, HE Lanjun, LIU Mingchao, CHEN Zhilin, LIANG Shuchao, XIE Qiang. The Niche of Dominant Species Population in Castanopsis hystrix Forest in Wantian,Guilin [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2012, 0(1): 54-60. |
[10] | LUO Yantao, MIAO Mengmeng, LIU Xiaoxia, MENG Yuyan, SONG Jiaojiao, ZHANG Feng. Niche Characteristics of Dominant Populations in Cotinus coggygria var. pubescens Communities,Shanxi [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2011, 0(4): 66-70. |
[11] | GAO Kun, ZHANG Feng. Niche Characteristics of Dominant Species in Juglans mandshurica Communities in Lishan Nature Reserve,Shanxi [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2011, 0(2): 42-47. |
[12] | ZHAO Shang, GU Jiancai, XI Xinqiang, YANG Yumei, CHEN Ping, XIANG Guangrui. Research on Larch Forest Herbs Niche in Saihanba [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2011, 0(1): 86-90. |
[13] | ZHAO Fangying, LIANG Lizhuang, SUN Jianxin, CHENG Xiaoqin. Study on the Niche of Dominant Species in Natural Restoration Vegetation of Beijing Shouyun Iron Mine Area [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2009, 0(5): 79-83. |
[14] | SHI Yu, YU Xinxiao, YUE Yongjie, BaoYufeng. The Niches of the Main tree Populations of Natural Secondary Forest Communities in Mountainous Area of Beijing ——A case study of Wuling Mountain Nature Reserve [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2008, 0(6): 62-66. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 332
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 309
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||