The Function Perception Evaluation of Fuzhou National Forest Park

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2017.03.014

Abstract

Abstract:

Based on the field survey and questionnaire survey of Fuzhou National Forestry Park,6 functions of Fuzhou National Forestry Park were evaluated in this paper with Semantic Difference(SD) analysis and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation. The results showed that most of the visitors had a better evaluation on the function of tourism,nature conservation,research and economic development and had a worse evaluation of the function of culture conservation and social development .Finally,the paper analyzed the results of the evaluation and put forward some suggestions.

Key words: Fuzhou, Semantic Difference(SD) analysis, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, national park

CLC Number:

F590.75

LIU Qunyue, LIN Yiwei, PAN Minghui, YOU Da, HUANG Qitang, LAN Siren. The Function Perception Evaluation of Fuzhou National Forest Park[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2017, (3): 69-74.

Figures/Tables 7

Tab.1

Tab.2

Numerical value for linguistic terms of the interviewees

评语	非常同意 ( $V 1$ )	较同意 ( $V 2$ )	一般 ( $V 3$ )	较不同意 ( $V 4$ )	非常不同意 ( $V 5$ )
分值	2	1	0	-1	-2

Tab.2

Fig.1

Fig.2

Tab.3

The function evaluation matrix table of Fuzhou National Forest Park

	$V 1$	$V 2$	$V 3$	$V 4$	$V 5$
$U 1$	0.314	0.434	0.206	0.039	0.007
$U 2$	0.303	0.396	0.217	0.061	0.023
$U 3$	0.159	0.214	0.427	0.173	0.027
$U 4$	0.237	0.398	0.314	0.043	0.008
$U 5$	0.179	0.261	0.431	0.085	0.044
$U 6$	0.319	0.405	0.216	0.060	0.000
$U$	0.298	0.351	0.327	0.018	0.006

Tab.3

Fig.3

Fig.4

References 14

[1]	廖奎. 促进旅游产业发展的税收政策建议[J]. 中国财政, 2013(12):62-63.
[2]	福建农林大学园林学院. 2015中国森林公园与森林旅游研究进展——新常态下森林公园与生态旅游产业创新发展[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2016.
[3]	谷晓萍, 李岩泉, 牛丽君, 等. 本溪关门山国家森林公园游客行为特征[J]. 生态学报, 2015,35(1):204-211. doi: 10.5846/stxb201405301123
[4]	李东瑾, 毕华. 中国国家森林公园旅游景区空间结构研究[J]. 中国人口资源与环境, 2016(1):274-277.
[5]	吴小旋, 张合平, 田红灯. 天际岭国家森林公园游憩价值评估[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2012,32(10):113-115.
[6]	邱勇. 福州国家森林公园内部交通管理模式探讨[J]. 科技经济市场, 2016(5):117-118.
[7]	郑耀星, 阮永明, 储德平. 善行旅游在生态型森林公园中的良性实践嫁接与再造——以福州国家森林公园为例[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2014,30(1):93-95.
[8]	杨建明, 余雅玲, 游丽兰. 福州国家森林公园的游客市场细分——基于游憩动机的因子-聚类分析[J]. 林业科学, 2015,51(9):106-115. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20150914
[9]	章俊华. 规划设计学中的调查分析法——SD法[J]. 中国园林, 2004(10):32-35.
[10]	Osgood C E, Suci G J, Tannenbaum P H. The measurement of meaning[M]. Chicago: Illinois Univ Press, 1957.
[11]	矫明阳, 高风, 郝培尧, 等. 基于SD法的城市带状公园植物景观评价研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2013,28(5):185-190.
[12]	康永祥, 陈亚萍, 莫春雷. 太白山国家森林公园综合功能数量评价[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2005,33(7):35-39.
[13]	苟爱萍, 王江波. 基于SD法的街道空间活力评价研究[J]. 规划师, 2011(10):102-106.
[14]	矫明阳, 高凤, 郝培尧, 等. 基于SD法的城市带状公园植物景观评价研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2013,28(5):185-190.

评价项目	评价指标	形容词对
U₁旅游功能(0.317)	U₁₁景区的观赏娱乐性(0.345)	观赏性差的—观赏性强的
	U₁₂景区的休闲度假(0.294)	休闲效果差的—效果好的
	U₁₃景区的生态疗养功能(0.226)	弱的—强的
	U₁₄餐饮环境(0.135)	不舒适的—舒适的
U₂自然保护功能(0.102)	U₂₁景区的森林生态(0.315)	不好的—良好的
	U₂₂景区的自然资源保护现状(0.235)	破坏严重的—保护良好的
	U₂₃生物多样性(0.223)	生物多样性低—生物多样性高
	U₂₄整体环境(0.227)	不美的—富有美感的
U₃文化保护功能(0.085)	U₃₁建筑乡土性(0.325)	没有地方特色—富有地方特色
	U₃₂民风民俗现状(0.226)	保留较少的—保留较多的
	U₃₃饮食文化(0.234)	不具特色—具有特色
	U₃₄地域性文化氛围(0.215)	淡薄的-浓厚的
U₄科研功能(0.105)	U₄₁社会科学研究价值(0.368)	没有价值的—富有价值的
	U₄₂人文科学研究作用(0.305)	作用小的—作用大的
	U₄₃自然科学研究资源(0.327)	单一的—丰富的
U₅社会发展功能(0.147)	U₅₁环境教育意义(0.343)	没有意义—非常有意义
	U₅₂提高个人素质作用(0.312)	没有作用—影响深刻
	U₅₃促进社会发展(0.345)	促进作用微弱—促进作用巨大
U₆经济发展功能(0.244)	U₆₁旅游效益(0.366)	效益差的—效益好的
	U₆₂促进当地经济发展(0.388)	影响小的—影响大的
	U₆₃对周边经济影响(0.246)	带动作用小—带动作用大

[1]	GU Lingzhen, YAN Shujun, LYU Wei, CHENG Min, HU Wenjing. Winter Birds Diversity in Urban Green Spaces of Fuzhou [J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2024, 0(1): 125-133.
[2]	ZHOU Long, YANG Xiaoxue, DUAN Xiaochen. Comprehensive Adaptability Evaluation of Six Kinds of Landscapeing Plants in Semi-arid Region [J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2024, 0(1): 73-81.
[3]	GENG Songtao, SUN Kexin, SONG Liangan, YAN Rong. The Franchising Development Path of the Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park Based on the Recreation Opportunity Spectrum [J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2024, 0(1): 8-16.
[4]	WANG Tianwei, LIU Rui. The Value,Existing Problems and Development Suggestions of China's National Park Concession System [J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2023, 0(6): 8-17.
[5]	ZHANG Bolin, QIAO Yongqiang, XU Wentong, TANG Xiaoping. Research on Ecotourism Standardization of Protected Areas [J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2023, 0(5): 1-8.
[6]	WU Tingtian, CHEN Yiqing, CHEN Zongzhu, LEI Jinrui, CHEN Xiaohua, LI Yuanling. Analysis on the Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Representative Populations in Tropical Rainforest of Hainan [J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2023, 0(5): 133-141.
[7]	LING Wei, WANG Yaxuan. Discussion on Optimization of Natural Resource Asset Management System in National Park [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(4): 11-17.
[8]	ZOU Tuchun, SONG Xiaoyou, JIANG Shujun, XU Qi, WU Kezhuang, XU Yiming, TANG Xiaoping, WANG Shu. Study on Establishment of Technical System for Management and Assessment of the Conservation Easement in the National Park [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(4): 18-26.
[9]	LUO Wen, LI Yanpeng, XU Han, QIN Wenhao, LIU Daye, MO Shiqin. Characteristics of Suitable Communities of Hopea hainanensis, a Wild Plant with Extremely Small Populations in National Park of Hainan Tropical Rainforest [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(4): 98-106.
[10]	MA Wei, LIU Zengli, WANG Zhichen, JIANG Yafang, TANG Xiaoping. Study on Tracing Pilot Work of China's National Park System [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(3): 1-8.
[11]	HUA Weiping, WU Jianwei, YU Liyao, WANG Yanan, WU Chengzhen, ZHUANG Chongyang, CHI Shangping, JIANG Xidian. Forestland Grading Based on Forest Potential Productivity Evaluation Model and Its Application [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(3): 29-37.
[12]	PENG Tailai, HUANG Junwei, LIU Jinshan, QI Jianwen. Quality Evaluation of Natural Forest Resources Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(6): 82-88.
[13]	ZHU Wanli, PAN Zhixin, MENG Longfei. Discussion on the Construction of Volunteer Service System in China’s National Parks from the Perspective of Public Participation: A Case from Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(5): 15-23.
[14]	TANG Xiaoping. Realization Path of High-Quality Development of National Parks [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(3): 1-11.
[15]	ZHANG Ling, YU Zeying, LIU Daoqiang, XIA Xin, HE Xiaoguang, XU Ping. Analysis on the Diversity of Public Education Resources in Giant Panda National Park [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(3): 19-24.