Study on Potassium Release Characteristics of Aeolian Sandy Soil Under Different Land Use Patterns in Zhanggutai,Liaoning Province

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2023.04.019

Abstract

Abstract:

Understanding the characteristics of soil potassium release under different land use patterns is highly significant for impoving land use and fertility in Aeolian sandy soil.This study used indoor simulation experiments and equation fitting methods to investigate the process,influencing factors and kinetic characteristics of non-exchangeable potassium in the soil in Zhanggutai area of Liaoning Province.The findings revealed two distinct stages of potassium release:rapid release(18~90hrs)and slow release(90~520hrs),with generally higher release in the 0~<20 cm depth compared to the 20~40 cm depth.Different land use types exhibited a positive impact on non-exchangeable potassium release.Specifically,the broad-leaved forest demonstrated the highest cumulative release in the 0~<20 cm soil layer,while the paddy field exhibited the highest release in the 20~40 cm soil layer.The Elovich equation yielded the best fit for the release process of non-exchangeable potassium in Aeolian sandy soil,with determination coefficients(R²)ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 and standard errors(SE)ranging from 0.97 to 2.78.The subsequent best fit was observed with the first-order kinetic equation,and the equation parameters accurately described the potassium supply capacity of Aeolian sandy soil.Non-exchangeable potassium release in the surface soil was closely correlated with soil potassium content,while in the subsoil,it was associated with soil colloid content.

Key words: soil improvement, land use, sandy soil, non-exchangeable potassium release, dynamics

CLC Number:

S153.6

CAO Yili, ZHANG Xueli, LYU Gang, AN Yuning, CHI Linlin, LIU Yang. Study on Potassium Release Characteristics of Aeolian Sandy Soil Under Different Land Use Patterns in Zhanggutai,Liaoning Province[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, (4): 161-168.

Figures/Tables 7

Tab.1

Fig.1

Tab.2

Tab.3

Tab.4

Tab.5

Fig.2

References 22

[1]	于锡宏, 赵文博, 程瑶, 等. 磷钾营养元素对辽东楤木生长及品质的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2021, 52(1):20-28.
[2]	Moritsuka N, Yanai J, Kosaki T. Possible processes releasing nonexchangeable potassium from the rhizosphere of maize[J]. Plant and Soil. 2004, 258(1/2):261-268. doi: 10.1023/B:PLSO.0000016556.79278.7f
[3]	Jalali M. Kinetics of nonexchangeable potassium release and availability in some calcareous soils of western Iran[J]. Geoderma. 2006, 135(1):63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.11.006
[4]	Jalali M. Spatial variability in potassium release among calcareous soils of western Iran[J]. Geoderma, 2007, 140(1-2):42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.03.013
[5]	Rao C S, Swarup A, Rao A S, et al. Kinetics of nonexchangeable potassium release from a Tropaquept as influenced by long-term cropping,fertilisation,and manuring[J]. Soil Research, 1999, 37(2):317-328. doi: 10.1071/S98049
[6]	Rao C S, Rao A, Rupa T R, et al. Plant mobilization of soil reserve potassium from fifteen smectitic soils in relation to soil test potassium and mineralogy[J]. Soil Science, 2000, 165(7):578-586. doi: 10.1097/00010694-200007000-00006
[7]	Martin H W, Sparks D L. Kinetics of nonexchangeable potassium release from two coastal plain soils1[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1983, 47(5):883-887. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1983.03615995004700050008x
[8]	张颖, 付嘉伟, 王蕾, 等. 黑土对邻苯二甲酸二丁酯吸附特性研究[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2019, 50(3):78-85.
[9]	闫雷, 潘东琪, 姜雪馨, 等. 四环素类抗生素在黑土和白浆土中吸附规律研究[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2017, 48(3):54-62.
[10]	Mohsen J, Zahra V K. Kinetics of potassium release from calcareous soils under different land use[J]. Arid Land Research and Management, 2014, 28(1):1-13. doi: 10.1080/15324982.2013.799615
[11]	Zareian G, Farpoor M H, Hejazi M, et al. Kinetics of non-exchangeable potassium release in selected soil orders of southern Iran[J]. Soil and Water Research, 2018, 13(4):200-207. doi: 10.17221/138/2017-SWR
[12]	Yohannes M, Tekalign T, Abi M, et al. Potassium Adsorption and Release Characteristics on Vertisols of North Western Ethiopian Highlands[J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2019, 50(9):1132-1147. doi: 10.1080/00103624.2019.1604732
[13]	廖育林, 郑圣先, 聂军, 等. 长期施用化肥和稻草对红壤性水稻土非交换性钾释放动力学的影响[J]. 土壤, 2011, 43(6):941-947.
[14]	李婷, 王火焰, 陈小琴, 等. 土壤非交换性钾释放动力学特征及其生物有效性[J]. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(5):1078-1087.
[15]	岳龙凯, 王伯仁, 黄庆海, 等. 长期施肥红壤及其有机无机复合体非交换性钾释放动力学[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(23):4748-4758. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.23.016
[16]	张会民. 长期施肥下我国典型农田土壤钾素演变特征及机理[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2007.
[17]	郑志斌, 江秋菊, 张跃强, 等. 长期施用化肥和秸秆对紫色土非交换性钾释放特性研究[J]. 西南大学学报:自然科学版, 2017, 39(9):139-144.
[18]	Beringer H. Adequacy of soil testing for predicting fertilizer requirements[J]. Plant and Soil, 1985, 83(1):21-37. doi: 10.1007/BF02182712
[19]	Rao C S, Rupa T R, Rao A S, et al. Subsoil potassium availability in twenty-two benchmark soil series of India[J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2001, 32(5-6):863-876. doi: 10.1081/CSS-100103913
[20]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[21]	刘娜, 佘维维, 秦树高, 等. 毛乌素沙地风沙土粒径和矿物组成对固定态铵含量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(23):131-138.
[22]	杨雅, 夏贤格, 范先鹏, 等. 长期秸秆还田提升稻麦轮作系统土壤供钾容量和强度[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28(4):589-597.

利用方式	利用年限/a	地下水位/m	作物/植被	坡度/(°)
T1	41	0	水稻(Oryza sativa)	<2
T2	41	2.6	玉米、花生(Zea mays and Arachis hypogaea)	<2
T3	41	5.5	羊草(Leymus chinensis)等	<2
T4	41	3.6	小叶锦鸡儿(Caragana microphylla)等	<5
T5	41	9.5	樟子松(Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica)	<5
T6	41	7.8	青甘杨(Populus przewalskii)	<5
T7	41	8.2	樟子松(Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica)×其他阔叶树种	<5

利用方式	土层/cm	RAK/ (mg/kg)	NEK/ (mg/kg)	CEC/ (cmol/kg)	OM/ (g/kg)	pH	NEK累积释放量 (90~520h)/(mg/kg)	NEK累积释放量占比/%
CK	0~<20	5.76c	81.36c	1.26c	0.42d	6.36a	19.55Ae	28.53
CK	20~40	2.84c	87.19c	1.00b	0.14c	6.40a	19.40Ae	26.02
T1	0~<20	30.50c	279.20b	7.70a	10.46a	5.85bc	40.58Bd	15.92
T1	20~40	31.30b	278.70ab	11.11a	7.36a	5.78bc	56.45Aa	22.34
T2	0~<20	64.10ab	328.30ab	4.82abc	6.42b	5.37c	54.07Ab	18.15
T2	20~40	59.30a	361.90a	9.22a	5.55ab	5.45c	50.31Ab	15.36
T3	0~<20	34.00bc	333.90ab	4.21abc	7.33b	6.25ab	58.82Ab	19.17
T3	20~40	22.30b	244.00abc	3.95b	5.02ab	6.15ab	41.68Bc	19.00
T4	0~<20	39.70bc	250.00b	2.03bc	2.92c	6.19ab	44.53Acd	19.86
T4	20~40	26.80b	167.20bc	1.73b	1.49c	6.21ab	26.73Bd	18.57
T5	0~<20	41.90b	332.30ab	4.99abc	7.41b	5.85bc	48.52Ac	16.17
T5	20~40	29.00b	288.50ab	5.03b	4.73b	6.04abc	43.45Ac	16.81
T6	0~<20	83.10a	430.50a	7.04ab	6.48b	6.22ab	82.40Aa	20.95
T6	20~40	39.40b	287.40ab	4.53b	4.29b	6.02abc	51.72Bb	19.83
T7	0~<20	51.30ab	377.90ab	5.35abc	7.91b	5.71c	55.92Ab	16.38
T7	20~40	27.50b	281.50ab	3.95b	4.47b	5.97abc	43.16Bc	17.07

利用方式	零级动力学方程				一级动力学方程				抛物线扩散方程				幂函数方程				Elovich方程
利用方式	a	b	R²	SE	a	b	R²	SE	a	b	R²	SE	a	b	R²	SE	a	b	R²	SE
CK	13.26	0.03	0.88	1.93	2.82	0.01	0.93	1.49	0.23	0.03	0.95	1.32	1.01	0.34	0.94	1.21	-6.94	4.65	0.97	1.03
T1	17.92	0.04	0.76	4.23	3.08	0.01	0.96	2.87	0.44	0.03	0.87	3.09	2.38	0.23	0.91	2.45	-0.09	7.13	0.97	1.59
T2	27.46	0.06	0.78	6.28	3.55	0.01	0.97	3.73	0.35	0.03	0.89	4.42	2.35	0.29	0.91	3.74	-8.99	11.03	0.98	1.98
T3	24.83	0.06	0.76	5.86	3.46	0.01	0.96	3.72	0.46	0.03	0.88	4.26	2.82	0.22	0.92	3.28	1.99	9.97	0.97	2.18
T4	23.16	0.05	0.80	4.83	3.39	0.01	0.96	2.96	0.35	0.03	0.90	3.36	2.20	0.28	0.92	2.78	-6.90	9.01	0.98	1.61
T5	23.80	0.05	0.79	5.13	3.40	0.01	0.96	3.20	0.38	0.03	0.90	3.61	2.39	0.26	0.92	2.90	-4.69	9.32	0.98	1.71
T6	38.19	0.09	0.78	8.66	3.89	0.01	0.96	5.18	0.41	0.03	0.89	6.11	2.99	0.25	0.92	4.80	-4.87	15.28	0.98	2.78
T7	27.66	0.06	0.78	6.26	3.54	0.01	0.96	4.01	0.38	0.03	0.89	4.49	2.48	0.27	0.91	3.73	-6.52	10.94	0.97	2.21

利用方式	零级动力学方程				一级动力学方程				抛物线扩散方程				幂函数方程				Elovich方程
利用方式	a	b	R²	SE	a	b	R²	SE	a	b	R²	SE	a	b	R²	SE	a	b	R²	SE
CK	12.03	0.03	0.87	1.85	2.73	0.01	0.93	1.43	0.28	0.03	0.94	1.29	1.23	0.30	0.94	1.14	-4.87	4.26	0.96	0.97
T1	28.95	0.06	0.77	6.70	3.57	0.01	0.98	4.18	0.35	0.03	0.89	4.71	2.36	0.29	0.91	4.03	-10.10	11.64	0.98	2.05
T2	24.53	0.05	0.77	5.64	3.41	0.01	0.96	3.69	0.38	0.03	0.88	4.05	2.40	0.27	0.91	3.35	-5.25	9.74	0.97	2.00
T3	19.92	0.04	0.81	4.07	3.23	0.01	0.95	2.67	0.41	0.03	0.90	2.88	2.35	0.24	0.93	2.25	-1.80	7.63	0.97	1.50
T4	17.13	0.04	0.85	2.89	3.08	0.01	0.95	1.92	0.25	0.03	0.94	1.93	1.32	0.34	0.93	1.76	-9.09	6.28	0.98	1.10
T5	22.91	0.05	0.80	4.81	3.35	0.01	0.97	2.98	0.34	0.03	0.90	3.34	2.13	0.29	0.92	2.79	-7.48	8.92	0.98	1.52
T6	24.98	0.06	0.79	5.48	3.47	0.01	0.96	3.30	0.39	0.03	0.90	3.84	2.47	0.26	0.93	3.06	-4.74	9.89	0.98	1.77
T7	22.63	0.05	0.79	4.88	3.36	0.01	0.96	3.02	0.34	0.03	0.90	3.43	2.12	0.29	0.92	2.90	-7.55	8.88	0.98	1.63

参数、影响因子及释放量	CEC	NEK	RAK	OM	pH	表层释放量	底层释放量
a1	0.198	0.848^**	0.872^**	0.487	-0.303	0.965^**	0.519
b1	0.245	0.841^**	0.879^**	0.528	-0.283	0.982^**	0.559
a2	0.876^**	0.895^**	0.734^*	0.953^**	-0.685	0.645	0.974^**
b2	0.942^**	0.817^*	0.668	0.953^**	-0.713^*	0.531	0.982^**
表层释放量	0.297	0.854^**	0.824^*	0.617	-0.225	1.000	0.612
底层释放量	0.927^**	0.862^**	0.703	0.977^**	-0.693	0.612	1.000