Forest and Grassland Resources Research ›› 2024›› Issue (1): 95-101.doi: 10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2024.01.013
• Technical Application • Previous Articles Next Articles
DING Qike1(), DOU Hao1, ZHANG Ershan1, HU Chuanwei2, HE Jing1()
Received:
2023-12-15
Revised:
2024-02-22
Online:
2024-02-28
Published:
2024-03-22
CLC Number:
DING Qike, DOU Hao, ZHANG Ershan, HU Chuanwei, HE Jing. Carbon Content of Landscaping Tree Species in Zhengzhou City[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2024, (1): 95-101.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.lyzygl.com.cn/EN/10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2024.01.013
Tab.1
Carbon content of each organ of Platanus occidentalis in different sample plot %
样地 | 含碳率 | 变异系数 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
树干 | 树枝 | 树叶 | 树皮 | 树根 | 平均值 | ||
悬铃木1 | 50.17 | 43.05 | 47.86 | 45.68 | 41.92 | 45.73 | 7.41 |
悬铃木2 | 52.75 | 43.14 | 48.01 | 45.58 | 41.83 | 46.26 | 9.36 |
悬铃木3 | 51.87 | 42.85 | 47.94 | 45.20 | 41.78 | 45.93 | 8.88 |
平均值 | 51.60 | 43.01 | 47.94 | 45.49 | 41.84 | 45.98 | 8.54 |
变异系数 | 2.54 | 0.36 | 0.16 | 0.56 | 0.17 | 0.58 |
Tab.2
Carbon content of various organs of 14 landscaping tree species %
树种 | 含碳率 | 变异 系数 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
树干 | 树枝 | 树叶 | 树皮 | 树根 | 地上部分平均值 | 平均值 | ||
悬铃木Platanus orientalis L | 51.60 | 43.01 | 47.94 | 45.49 | 41.84 | 47.01 | 45.98 | 8.54 |
杨树Populus L | 48.48 | 43.88 | 44.00 | 43.46 | 49.23 | 44.96 | 45.81 | 6.11 |
白玉兰Michelia alba DC | 51.88 | 45.02 | 33.53 | 39.50 | 46.94 | 42.48 | 43.37 | 16.29 |
银杏Ginkgo biloba L | 49.71 | 36.22 | 45.52 | 47.63 | 47.07 | 44.77 | 45.23 | 11.62 |
紫叶李Prunus cerasifera 'Atropurpurea' | 57.94 | 56.00 | 46.54 | 51.71 | 48.33 | 53.05 | 52.10 | 9.33 |
日本晚樱Prunus serrulata var.lannesiana (Carri.)Makino | 53.77 | 56.21 | 41.58 | 57.90 | 45.60 | 52.37 | 51.01 | 13.87 |
山楂Crataegus pinnatifida Bunge | 41.61 | 42.90 | 43.04 | 29.48 | 25.88 | 39.26 | 36.58 | 22.54 |
山桃Prunus davidiana(Carrière)Franch | 43.01 | 39.03 | 36.80 | 34.18 | 33.56 | 38.26 | 37.32 | 10.34 |
桂花Osmanthus fragrnas(Thunb.)Lour | 50.69 | 49.45 | 46.38 | 48.26 | 45.07 | 48.70 | 47.97 | 4.73 |
女贞Ligustrum lucidum Ait | 57.01 | 45.53 | 49.15 | 44.50 | 50.83 | 49.05 | 49.40 | 10.07 |
广玉兰Magnolia grandiflora L | 59.15 | 54.61 | 44.11 | 52.34 | 54.01 | 52.55 | 52.84 | 10.40 |
雪松Cedrus deodara(Roxb.)G.Don | 53.93 | 54.77 | 49.59 | 50.54 | 46.73 | 52.21 | 51.11 | 6.43 |
枇杷Eriobotrya japonica(Thunb.)Lindl | 40.50 | 37.92 | 46.70 | 50.59 | 39.08 | 43.93 | 42.96 | 12.68 |
石楠Photinia serratifolia(Desf.)Kalkman | 44.95 | 45.62 | 48.67 | 43.20 | 48.16 | 45.61 | 46.12 | 4.95 |
平均值 | 50.30 | 46.44 | 44.54 | 45.16 | 44.52 | 46.61 | 46.18 | |
变异系数 | 11.93 | 14.61 | 10.44 | 19.30 | 16.54 |
Tab.3
Analysis of carbon content of different organ in the same tree species %
树种 | 含碳率 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
树干 | 树枝 | 树叶 | 树皮 | 树根 | |
悬铃木Platanus orientalis L | 51.60±1.31a | 43.01±0.15d | 47.94±0.08b | 45.49±0.25c | 41.84±0.07d |
杨树Populus L | 48.48±1.11ab | 43.88±3.32b | 44.00±2.96ab | 43.46±2.73b | 49.23±2.18a |
白玉兰Michelia alba DC | 51.88±1.58a | 45.02±0.72b | 33.53±3.91d | 39.50±1.09c | 46.94±2.36b |
银杏Ginkgo biloba L | 49.71±3.25a | 36.22±0.35c | 45.52±0.68b | 47.63±1.18ab | 47.07±0.22ab |
紫叶李Prunus cerasifera 'Atropurpurea' | 57.94±2.44a | 56.00±2.53ab | 46.54±2.06c | 51.71±7.23abc | 48.33±2.74bc |
日本晚樱Prunus serrulata var.lannesiana (Carri.)Makino | 53.77±2.11a | 56.21±0.76a | 41.58±3.19b | 57.90±2.46a | 45.60±0.98b |
山楂Crataegus pinnatifida Bunge | 41.61±5.08b | 42.90±2.12b | 43.04±1.66b | 29.48±1.00a | 25.88±0.67a |
山桃Prunus davidiana (Carrière)Franch | 43.01±0.88b | 39.03±0.72c | 36.80±1.44c | 34.18±0.37d | 33.56±2.05d |
桂花Osmanthus fragrnas (Thunb.)Lour | 50.69±1.16a | 49.45±1.30ab | 46.38±1.95bc | 48.26±3.77abc | 45.07±0.67c |
女贞Ligustrum lucidum Ait | 57.01±1.27a | 45.53±0.65bc | 49.15±4.39bc | 44.50±4.24c | 50.83±1.54b |
广玉兰Magnolia grandiflora L | 59.15±3.14a | 54.61±1.63ab | 44.11±1.75c | 52.34±4.24b | 54.01±2.10ab |
雪松Cedrus deodara(Roxb.)G.Don | 53.93±5.56a | 54.77±4.29a | 49.59±2.43a | 50.54±4.42a | 46.73±6.25a |
枇杷Eriobotrya japonica(Thunb.)Lindl | 40.50±4.22b | 37.92±1.26b | 46.70±3.12a | 50.59±2.40a | 39.08±1.21b |
石楠Photinia serratifolia (Desf.)Kalkman | 44.95±2.12c | 45.62±1.08bc | 48.67±0.95a | 43.20±2.02c | 48.16±0.90ab |
Tab.4
Carbon content of the same organ in different tree species %
树种 | 含碳率 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
树干 | 树枝 | 树叶 | 树皮 | 树根 | |
悬铃木Platanus orientalis L | 51.60±1.31bc | 43.01±0.15c | 47.94±0.08a | 45.49±0.25 | 41.84±0.07c |
杨树Populus L | 48.48±1.11c | 43.88±3.32c | 44.00±2.96abc | 43.46±2.73cd | 49.23±2.18a |
白玉兰Michelia alba DC | 51.88±1.58bc | 45.02±0.72c | 33.53±3.91d | 39.50±1.09de | 46.94±2.36ab |
银杏Ginkgo biloba L | 49.71±3.25bc | 36.22±0.35d | 45.52±0.68abc | 47.63±1.18bc | 47.07±0.22ab |
紫叶李Prunus cerasifera 'Atropurpurea' | 57.94±2.44a | 56.00±2.53b | 46.54±2.06ab | 51.71±7.23b | 48.33±2.74ab |
日本晚樱Prunus serrulata var.lannesiana (Carri.)Makino | 53.77±2.11ab | 56.21±0.76b | 41.58±3.19c | 57.90±2.46a | 45.60±0.98b |
山楂Crataegus pinnatifida Bunge | 41.61±5.08d | 42.90±2.12c | 43.04±1.66bc | 29.48±1.00f | 25.88±0.67e |
山桃Prunus davidiana (Carrière)Franch | 43.01±0.88d | 39.03±0.72d | 36.80±1.44d | 34.18±0.37e | 33.56±2.05d |
桂花Osmanthus fragrnas (Thunb.)Lour | 50.69±1.16bc | 49.45±1.30b | 46.38±1.95a | 48.26±3.77ab | 45.07±0.67c |
女贞Ligustrum lucidum Ait | 57.01±1.27ab | 45.53±0.65b | 49.15±4.39a | 44.50±4.24b | 50.83±1.54ab |
广玉兰Magnolia grandiflora L | 59.15±3.14a | 54.61±1.63a | 44.11±1.75a | 52.34±4.24a | 54.01±2.10a |
雪松Cedrus deodara (Roxb.)G.Don | 53.93±5.56ab | 54.77±4.29a | 49.59±2.43a | 50.54±4.42ab | 46.73±6.25bc |
枇杷Eriobotrya japonica (Thunb.)Lindl | 40.50±4.22d | 37.92±1.26c | 46.70±3.12a | 50.59±2.40ab | 39.08±1.21d |
石楠Photinia serratifolia (Desf.)Kalkman | 44.95±2.12cd | 45.62±1.08b | 48.67±0.95a | 43.20±2.02b | 48.16±0.90bc |
[1] | 唐佳, 方江平. 森林生态系统服务功能价值评估指标体系研究[J]. 西藏科技, 2010(3):71-75. |
[2] | 杨同辉, 夏晨诚, 曹菁. 浙江天童主要树种含碳率分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(33):390-392. |
[3] | Reay S D. Climate change for the masses[J]. Nature:International Weekly Journal of Science, 2008, 452(7183):31-31. |
[4] | 李康杰, 胡中岳, 刘萍, 等. 广东省珠三角乔木林生物量碳储量评估[J]. 林业资源管理, 2022(4):54-60. |
[5] | 张峰, 彭祚登. 北京市森林碳储量和碳汇经济价值研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2021(6):52-58. |
[6] | 吕浩, 彭春良, 吴惠俐, 等. 森林生态系统不同碳库碳储量估算方法综述[J]. 湖南林业科技, 2022, 49(6):90-98. |
[7] | 付玉杰, 田地, 侯正阳, 等. 全球森林碳汇功能评估研究进展[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2022, 44(10):1-10. |
[8] |
Gao Bilei, Taylor R A, Chen Han, et al. Variation in total and volatile carbon concentration among the major tree species of the boreal forest[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2016, 375:191-199.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.05.041 |
[9] | 李凯锋, 罗于洋, 王树森, 等. 科尔沁大青沟3种群落乔木层优势树种含碳率分布特征的研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2013(4):47-52. |
[10] |
Martin R A, Gezahegn S, Thomas C S. Variation in carbon and nitrogen concentration among major woody tissue types in temperate trees[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2015, 45(6):744-757.
doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2015-0024 |
[11] | 刘维, 张晓丽, 马菁. 鹫峰国家森林公园主要乔木树种含碳率分析[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2011, 26(5):214-218. |
[12] | 章理运, 段传宏, 李月凤. 信阳市城镇园林绿化树种的选择与应用[J]. 信阳农业高等专科学校学报, 2003(4):14-16. |
[13] | 徐昉, 李明慧, 施以, 等. 基于双碳目标的园林植物景观营建策略研究——以北京市海淀公园为例[J]. 园林, 2023, 40(1):34-41. |
[14] | 郭群, 李运中, 苗伟, 等. 许昌市城镇园林绿化植物配置选择研究[J]. 绿色科技, 2019,(19):59-61. |
[15] | 王敏, 石乔莎. 城市绿色碳汇效能影响因素及优化研究[J]. 中国城市林业, 2015, 13(4):1-5. |
[16] | 马俊青, 李高阳, 田丽. 河南省主要造林树种含碳率比较研究[J]. 河南农业科学, 2012, 41(9):131-132. |
[17] | 白保勋, 焦书道, 陈东海. 河南中北部38个常见树种的生物量与固碳特征分析[J]. 西部林业科学, 2017, 46(1):79-84. |
[18] | 张栋, 刘桂华. 郑州市树木园植物群落景观综合评价[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2023, 43(10):178-186. |
[19] | 杨希博. 河南郑州园林植物系属组成及植物景观评价[J]. 分子植物育种, 2023, 21(16):5533-5538. |
[20] | 陈菲. 郑州东区小游园园林植物配置调查研究[J]. 河南农业, 2023(06):51-52. |
[21] | 邢建丽, 郭凌, 闫丽君, 等. 郑州市园林地被植物物种多样性研究[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2017, 51(2):237-242. |
[22] | 双龙, 妮萨娜, 杜江, 等. 重铬酸钾氧化-外加热法测定化探土壤样品中有机碳含量[J]. 安徽化工, 2016, 42(4):110-112. |
[23] | 徐期瑚, 林丽平, 薛春泉, 等. 广东樟树各器官含碳率及碳储量[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2019, 36(1):70-79. |
[24] | 陆龙龙, 袁靓, 范春楠, 等. 长白山林区主要树种含碳率及其差异分析[J]. 北华大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 19(2):164-169. |
[25] | 焦秀梅, 项文化, 田大伦. 湖南省森林植被的碳贮量及其地理分布规律[J]. 中南林学院学报, 2005(1):4-8. |
[26] | 田大伦, 王新凯, 方晰, 等. 喀斯特地区不同植被恢复模式幼林生态系统碳储量及其空间分布[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(9):7-14. |
[27] | 王春梅, 邵彬, 王汝南. 东北地区两种主要造林树种生态系统固碳潜力[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(7):1764-1772. |
[1] | LIU Xuejian, ZHANG Zhihua, HAO Beibei, WANG Nan, MA Yu, HE Bin, ZHANG Siyi. Effects of Eucalyptus Afforestationon the Soil Organic Carbon Pool on the Hillslope of in the Red Soil Collapsing Erosion Area [J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2023, 0(6): 75-81. |
[2] | LI Siying, GUO Haotian, CHEN Xiaowei, ZHOU Mengli, JIN Shanshan, YAN Dongfeng. Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Soil Organic Carbon in Quercus variabilis Plantation and Its Influencing Factors [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(4): 80-89. |
[3] | WANG Cuiping, HAN Xiaohong, WANG Haochen, YOU Jiaqi. Responses of Vegetation in Mu Us Sandy Land to Climate Change from 1982 to 2020 [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(3): 80-89. |
[4] | XIAO Yunwu, YANG Jianjun, SONG Nana. Characterization of Caloric Values in 15 Plant Species in the Desert Zone on the North Slope of Eastern Tianshan Mountain [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(1): 42-50. |
[5] | WANG Xu, ZHANG Xueli, ZHANG Risheng, CHI Linlin, XIAO Wei, WANG Cuiping. Effects of Pinus sylvestris Plantation on Dust Fall in Horqin Sandy Land [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(6): 109-116. |
[6] | FANG Fazhi, LI Zhaojia, GUI Huiyin, WU Zhongqin. Effects of Exotic Tree Species on Soil Physicochemical Property in Limu Mountain of Hainan [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(3): 104-109. |
[7] | OU Zeyu, PENG Zhen, WANG Yuanyuan, ZHANG Xidan, RAO Feng, XIE Peilin, WAN Pan. Effects of Management Methods on Soil Organic Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Oak Secondary Forests [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2022, 0(3): 96-103. |
[8] | QI Cheng. Survey and Analysis of Wild Animal Resources in Xinjiang Taxkorgan Wildlife Nature Reserve [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2021, 0(3): 145-148. |
[9] | LIU Yongjie, LI Hui. Study on Forest Land Data Updating Synchronization Based on GeoSOT Global Subdivision Grid [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2021, 0(3): 149-153. |
[10] | YU Fazhan, ZHANG Zhongqi, SHAN Yongbing. A Study on Characteristics of Forest Soil Carbon Pool in Huangcang Valley Nature Reserve of Anhui Province [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2020, 0(6): 90-95. |
[11] | GONG Yingyun, WANG Ruihui, ZHANG Bin, LIU Kaili, DONG Kaili, LIU Juntao, ZHAO Suya, ZHOU Yuhuai. Effects of thinning on growth and soil organic carbon of Cryptomeria fortunei Plantation in Western Sichuan [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2020, 0(6): 96-104. |
[12] | HAN Conghai, FAN Yaqian, JIANG Jian, SONG Ze, ZHAO Xinyuan. A Study on the Relationship between Batrachium Pekinens L.Liou Distribution and Environmental Features [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2020, 0(4): 102-108. |
[13] | Zhiming TANG, Bingxiang LIU, Yu QU. Study on Biomass and Carbon Storage of Arbor Layers in Typical Soil and Water Conservation Forests in Taihang Mountain Range in Hebei Province [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2020, 0(1): 102-107. |
[14] | ZHOU Huiping, WANG Xiaobing, CAO Yinghui, WANG Aizhi, LIANG Wanyan. A Study on Vertical Distribution Characteristics of Soil Organic Carbon in Juniper Plantation [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2019, 0(6): 108-114. |
[15] | GUO Jia, XU Hualing, ZHANG Mingqian, XU Weigang, MA Muyuan, ZHAO Nana, LI Xiaoxia, ZHU Yaojun. Effects of Six Typical Halophytes on Salt Soil Nutrients [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2019, 0(3): 107-112. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||