Study on the Effect of Environmental Protection on theTourism Utilization Efficiency of Forest Resources

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2017.06.020

Abstract

Abstract:

Environmental protection,for forest scenic spots,is only a cost payment for public goods,or can bring benefits?In order to solve this problem,this paper takes forest parks as an example to study the relationship between environmental protection investment and tourism utilization efficiency of forest resources by using DEA efficiency evaluation method and Tobit multiple regression method.The following conclusions are drawn.Firstly,there is a significant positive linear relationship between forest park environmental protection and forest park tourism utilization efficiency.The greater the proportion of environmental protection investment in total investment,the higher the efficiency of forest park tourism;Secondly,there is a significant positive impact of capital investment on the tourism efficiency of forest parks,but this effect has an one-lag effect.Regional population density,the degree of urbanization and so on have significant positive impacts on its efficiency.Thirdly,compared with the northwest region,three regions including the eastern coast,the southern coast,southwestern area have significant geographical advantages,the maximum advantage for the eastern coastal location.

Key words: forest tourism resources, tourism efficiency, environmental protection investment, tobit-DEA regression model

CLC Number:

F205

HUANG Xiujuan, ZHU Jiajia, YANG Minfang. Study on the Effect of Environmental Protection on theTourism Utilization Efficiency of Forest Resources[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2017, (6): 113-119.

Figures/Tables 7

Tab.1

Tab.2

Fig.1

Fig.2

Tab.3

Fig.3

Tab.4

References 22

[1]	赵玉焕. 贸易经济增长与环境保护的关系研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2003(6):61-66.
[2]	罗良清, 胡晓琳. 中国省域环境保护与经济发展双赢平衡研究——环境效率视角[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2016,32(2):40-47.
[3]	长生, 简玉峰. 环境保护与旅游经济协调发展研究——基于中国四大世界自然与文化遗产旅游目的地的面板数据分析[J]. 旅游学刊, 2010,25(10):23-31.
[4]	朱浩, 傅强, 魏琪. 地方政府环境保护支出效率核算及影响因素实证研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2014,24(6):91-96.
[5]	孙开, 孙琳. 基于投入产出率的财政环境保护支出效率研究[J]. 税务与经济, 2016(5):101-106.
[6]	潘孝珍. 中国地方政府环境保护支出的效率分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2013,23(11):61-65.
[7]	Crouch G L, Ritchie J R B. Tourism,Competitiveness,and Societal Prosperity[J]. Journal of Business Research, 1999,44(1):137-152.
[8]	Buckley R, Weaver C.Nature-Based Tourism, Environment and Landscape Management[M]. Wallingford: CAB International Publishing, 2008.
[9]	Tanja M. Environmental management of a tourist destination—A factor of tourism competitiveness[J]. Tourism Management, 2000,21(1):65-78.
[10]	Twan H, Jeff B. Environmental management and the competitiveness of nature-based tourism destinations[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2003,24:213-233. doi: 10.1023/A:1022942001100
[11]	Ervin D E. Voluntary Resource Conservation and Environmental Management in Agriculture and Forestry[J]. Encyclopedia of Energy,Natural Resource,and Environmental Economics, 2015,2(1):124-132.
[12]	黄秀娟, 林秀治. 我国森林公园旅游效率及其影响因素[J]. 林业科学, 2015,51(2):137-146.
[13]	方琰, 卞显红. 基于DEA 的中国森林公园旅游发展效率特征分析[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2014(11):51-58.
[14]	李平, 王维薇, 张俊飚. 我国林业旅游资源开发效率动态演进与区域差异的实证研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报:社会科学版, 2016(4):41-48.
[15]	程南洋, 屈作新. 国内森林公园旅游服务业TFP演变及其地区差异——基于DEA-MPI的分析[J]. 林业经济, 2015(1):75-81.
[16]	丁振民, 黄秀娟. 资本投入对中国森林公园旅游效率的影响研究[J]. 资源科学, 2016,38(7):1363-1372.
[17]	2010年度森林公园建设经营情况统计表[EB/OL]. (2012-02-28)[2017-02-14]. http://zgslgy.forestry.gov.cn/portal/slgy/s/2452/content-535119.html.
[18]	2011年度森林公园建设经营情况统计表[EB/OL]. (2012-03-28)[2017-02-14]. http://zgslgy.forestry.gov.cn/portal/slgy/s/2452/content-535121.html.
[19]	2012年度森林公园建设经营情况统计表[EB/OL]. (2013-04-01)[2017-02-14]. http://zgslgy.forestry.gov.cn/portal/slgy/s/2452/content-593275.html.
[20]	2013年度森林公园建设经营情况统计表[EB/OL]. (2014-04-09)[2017-02-14]. http://zgslgy.forestry.gov.cn/portal/slgy/s/2452/content-669507.html.
[21]	2014年度森林公园建设经营情况统计表[EB/OL]. (2015-06-11)[2017-02-14]. http://zgslgy.forestry.gov.cn/portal/slgy/s/2452/content-774456.html.
[22]	2015年度森林公园建设经营情况统计表[EB/OL]. (2016-08-01)[2017-02-14]. http://zgslgy.forestry.gov.cn/portal/slgy/s/2452/content-8935316.html.

指标	变量	均值	标准差	最小值	最大值
产出指标	旅游收入/万元	112368.8	191462.2	658.7	1521613
产出指标	旅游人数/人次	1769.3	2056.7	18	14795.0
投入指标	森林公园面积/hm²	557694.3	581197.4	1952.1	2496728
	年度投入资金/万元	91114.8	124921.3	195.6	1182524.0
	职工人数/人	4976.6	4273.9	83	18695

变量	量化方法与单位	均值	标准差	最小值	最大值
envr	环境保护投资占总投资比例/%	15.37	12.11	0	92.39
cd	森林公园单位面积投入资本额/(万元/hm²)	0.46	0.99	0.00	7.30
ld	森林公园单位面积职工人数/(人/万 hm²)	239.68	402.34	0.64	2545.98
fp	国家级森林公园面积占比/%	67.19	19.03	18.54	100
gdpp	人均GDP/(千元/人)	37.9	18.4	11.0	91.1
pd	区域单位面积人口数/(人/km²)	461.08	728.81	2.47	4182.76
urbr	区域城镇人口占总人口比率/%	51.83	14.22	22.30	89.33
tral	区域单位面积等级公路里程数/(km/km²)	11.58	6.46	1.17	26.61
tourrev	区域旅游外汇收入/百万美元	1945.24	2902.75	4.43	17884.66

效率	模型1		模型2		模型3
envr	0.00699	(2.27)^**	0.005813	(1.97)^**	0.00610	(2.13)^**
envr²	0.00005	(-1.05)	-0.00004	(-0.86)	-0.00004	(-0.91)
cd			-0.20024	(-3.43)^***	-0.22311	(-3.98)^***
cd-1			0.12171	(2.18)^**	0.11979	(1.91)^*
cd-2			0.03891	(0.55)	-0.01846	(-0.23)
ld			-0.00005	(0.02)	-0.0004	(-1.78)^*
fq			0.00146	(0.71)	0.00160	(0.73)
gdpp					-0.11757	(-2.7)^***
pd					0.00047	(2.5)^***
urbr					0.01272	(2.04)^**
tral					0.21858	(1.28)
tourrev					0.0001	(0.59)
d1	0.02920	(0.19)	0.02267	(0.14)	-0.09206	(-0.54)
d2	0.15823	(1.12)	0.18173	(1.16)	-0.23342	(-1.01)
d3	0.64856	(3.79)^***	0.83590	(3.14)^***	0.53715	(2.05)^**
d4	0.31724	(2.06)^**	0.34695	(2.02)^**	0.06854	(0.37)
d5	-0.00016	(0.000)	0.01923	(0.13)	-0.12780	(-0.77)
效率	模型1		模型2		模型3
d6	0.13338	(0.95)	0.14964	(0.96)	-0.05779	(-0.32)
d7	0.39991	(3.00)^***	0.41813	(2.91)^**	0.30175	(2.16)^**
_cons	0.32181	(3.21)^***	0.2276	(1.23)	-0.02832	(-0.09)
Wald	50.79^***		64.25^***		96.00^***
Sigma-u	0.19751	(6.52)	0.21547	(6.08)^***	0.18622	(5.83)^***
Sigma-e	0.17861	(16.76)	0.16671	(16.64)^***	0.16151	(16.58)^***
rho	0.55014		0.62533		0.57071

区域	单位面积投资/ (100元/hm²)	环境保护投资占比/%	效率
东北地区	23.23	14.81	0.46
北部沿海	40.93	18.76	0.60
东部沿海	275.16	26.14	0.89
南部沿海	16.62	19.23	0.72
黄河中游	19.39	12.97	0.42
长江中游	37.18	12.31	0.53
西南地区	49.55	10.80	0.77
大西北地区	10.46	13.13	0.43