Forest Ecological Function Evaluation of the Honghuaerji Forestry Administration

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2016.05.023

Abstract

Abstract: Honghuaerji Forestry Administration is the centralized distribution area of our country's natural Pinus sylvestris (Pinus sylvestris var.Mongolica).Pinus sylvestris accounts for 52 percent of the forest land,The proportion of Birch (Betula platyphylla) stands at 46 percent.Evaluating the ecological functions of the forestry administration,in order to develop sound forest management plan,provide a theoretical basis for guiding forest management.According to forest resources planning and design data in Honghuaerji,national continuous forest inventory assessment methods are used to evaluate the ecological functions of the forestry administration.The results showed that the forest eco-functional level in Honghuaerji is mainly at medium level,occupying a forest area about 93%;eco-functional levels for the good and bad ratings of the forest area are 4% and 3%;global forest ecological function index is 0.55,and the forest eco-functional level is “medium”.In accordance with the evaluation of each forest farm (nature reserve),the best ecological function of the forest is Honghuaerji Nature Reserve,and the worst is Baritu.According to each age group evaluation,the worst ecological function is in young stand forests,ecological functions of the remaining age groups were better than the average.According to species structure evaluation,the ecological function of deciduous broad-leaved forest,deciduous broad-leaved and coniferous forest,and broad-leaved mixed forest are better than pure coniferous forest,pure broad-leaved forest and relatively-pure coniferous forest.According to species origin evaluation,the ecological function of natural forest is better than plantation.

Key words: Honghuaerji, forest ecological function, index, level

CLC Number:

S718.55

AN Huijun, ZHANG Zhijie, CHANG Zheng, ZHANG Jian, MA Yan, WANG Shuo, ZHANG Yuanjie. Forest Ecological Function Evaluation of the Honghuaerji Forestry Administration[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2016, (5): 131-137.

References

[1] 李文华,李飞.中国林业资源研究[M].北京:中国林业出版,1996.
[2] 中国可持续发展林业战略研究项目组.中国可持续发展林业战略研究总论[C].北京:中国林业出版社,2002.
[3] 国家林业局.第八次全国森林资源清查结果[J].林业资源管理,2014(1):1-2.
[4] 周晓峰.森林生态功能与经营途径[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1999.
[5] 张永利,杨锋伟,王兵,等.中国森林生态系统服务功能研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
[6] 鲍文,包维楷,何丙辉,等.森林生态系统对降水的分配与拦截效应[J].山地学报,2004,22(4):482-491
[7] 刘煊章,田大伦,周志华.杉木林生态系统净化水质功能的研究[J].林业科学,1995,31(3):193-1995.
[8] 杨吉华.山丘地区森林保持水土效益的研究[J].水土保持学报,1993,7(3):47-52.
[9] 将延玲,周广胜.中国主要森林生态系统公益的评价[J].植物生态学报,1999,23(5):426-432.
[10] 张金池,康立新,卢义山.苏北海堤主要防护林类型防蚀功能研究[J].1996,20(3):11-15.
[11] 周广胜,张新时.全球气候变化的中国自然植被的净第一生产力的研究[J].植物生态学报,1996,20(1):11-19.
[12] 傅伯杰,刘世良,马克明.生态系统综合评价的内容与方法[J].生态学报,2001,21(11):1885-1892.
[13] 关文彬,王自力,陈建成,等.贡嘎山地区森林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].北京林业大学学报,2002,24(4):80-84.
[14] 靳芳,鲁绍伟,余新晓,等.中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评价[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(8):1531-1536.
[15] 刘璨.森林固碳与释氧的经济核算[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2003,27(5):25-29.
[16] 余新晓,秦永胜,陈丽华,等.北京山地森林生态服务功能及其经济价值初步研究[J].生态学报,2002,22(5):783-786.
[17] 陈遐林.华北主要林分类型的碳汇功能研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2003.
[18] 胡会峰,刘国华.中国天然林保护工程的固碳能力评估[J].生态学报,2006,26(1):291-296.
[19] 刘国华,傅伯杰,方精云.中国森林碳动态及其对全球碳平衡的贡献[J].生态学报,2000,20(5):733-740.
[20] 高明福,罗刚,塔娜,等.红花尔基林业局森林资源现状分析及经营对策[J].内蒙古林业调查设计,2006,19(3):34.
[21] 李永多,王之迹,国丰富.红花尔基樟子松林生长状况及结实规律的调查[J].林业科学,1981(3):306-313.
[22] 杨帆,刘康,王效科,等.内蒙古红花尔基沙地樟子松群落多样性变异研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2005,19(4):192-196.
[23] 任丽娟,岳永杰,耿庆春,等.红花尔基樟子松群落结构及物种多样性研究[J].内蒙古农业大学学报,2013,34(3):58-64.
[24] 毛磊.红花尔基天然樟子松林分空间结构及其更新演替规律研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2009.
[25] 刘琳,刘美爽,徐永飞,等.我国重点国有林业局林地面积变化及趋势分析[J].林业科学,2015,51(8):88-94.
[26] 刘洪林.内蒙古大兴安岭:建设生态文明先行林区[J].半月谈,2014(11):91-92.
[27] GB/T 26424-2010,森林资源规划设计调查技术规程[S].